How Hipaa Laws Don't Apply To Jury Duty

Serving on a jury can be a fascinating and rewarding experience, but it can also be a stressful and confusing one, especially when it comes to understanding your rights and responsibilities as a juror. One common question that prospective jurors have is whether or not their medical information is protected by HIPAA laws during the jury duty process. The answer is a bit complex. While HIPAA laws do generally protect an individual's health information, there are certain circumstances under which this information can be disclosed without the individual's authorization. One of these circumstances is when a court order or subpoena is issued. In the context of jury duty, this could mean that your health information could potentially be shared with the court or attorneys involved in the case if they have obtained a court order or subpoena specifically requesting this information. However, it's important to note that HIPAA-covered entities are only allowed to disclose the information specifically described in the court order and must follow certain notification requirements to protect the individual's privacy. Additionally, as a juror, you may be required to fill out a questionnaire that could include sensitive information about your health, and these questionnaires may be accessed by the public in some circumstances. While your privacy as a juror is important, attorneys also have a duty to their clients to carefully select jurors and ensure they are not biased. This can sometimes result in extensive scrutiny of your background and private life, which may feel like a violation of your privacy rights. In conclusion, while HIPAA laws do provide protection for your health information, there are exceptions to these laws, and serving on a jury may involve a certain level of disclosure and scrutiny that is necessary to ensure a fair trial.

HIPAA-covered entities may disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials without individual authorization under specific circumstances

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 establishes national standards to protect sensitive health information from disclosure without a patient's consent. The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued the HIPAA Privacy Rule to implement HIPAA requirements. The Privacy Rule standards address the use and disclosure of individuals' protected health information (PHI) by entities subject to the rule. These individuals and organizations are called "covered entities."

The Privacy Rule permits covered entities to disclose protected health information to law enforcement officials without individual authorization under specific circumstances. These circumstances include:

• To comply with a court order, court-ordered warrant, subpoena, or summons issued by a judicial officer, or a grand jury subpoena.
• To respond to an administrative request, including an administrative subpoena or summons, a civil or authorized investigative demand, or a similar process authorized by law.
• To respond to a request for PHI for purposes of identifying or locating a suspect, fugitive, material witness, or missing person. Covered entities must limit disclosures of PHI to specific information such as name, address, date and place of birth, and social security number.
• To report PHI to law enforcement when required by law to do so. For example, state laws may require health care providers to report incidents of gunshot or stab wounds.
• To alert law enforcement to the death of an individual when there is a suspicion that death resulted from criminal conduct.
• To report PHI that the covered entity believes to be evidence of a crime that occurred on its premises.
• When responding to an off-site medical emergency, to alert law enforcement about criminal activity, including the nature and location of the crime and the identity and location of the perpetrator.
• To a law enforcement official reasonably able to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to the health or safety of an individual or the public.
• To identify or apprehend an individual who appears to have escaped from lawful custody.
• To federal officials authorized to conduct intelligence, counter-intelligence, and other national security activities.
• To provide protective services to the President and others and conduct related investigations.
• To respond to a request for PHI by a correctional institution or a law enforcement official having lawful custody of an inmate.

It is important to note that the disclosure of PHI to law enforcement officials is subject to the minimum necessary determination by the covered entity. Covered entities must make reasonable efforts to limit the use and disclosure of PHI to the minimum amount necessary to accomplish the intended purpose.

A HIPAA-covered entity may disclose protected health information if it has a court order

The Privacy Rule permits covered entities to disclose protected health information (PHI) to law enforcement officials without the individual's written authorization under specific circumstances. One of these circumstances is to comply with a court order or court-ordered warrant. The Rule recognizes that the legal process in obtaining a court order provides protections for the individual's private information.

Before responding to a subpoena, the covered entity should receive evidence that reasonable efforts were made to notify the person who is the subject of the information about the request, so they have a chance to object to the disclosure. Alternatively, the covered entity should seek a qualified protective order for the information from the court.

A subpoena issued by someone other than a judge is different from a court order

A subpoena is a legal order to attend court and produce documentation or give testimony. Subpoenas are issued by a court clerk or an attorney in a case and are different from a court order, which is issued by a judge.

HIPAA-covered health care providers or health plans may disclose protected health information if they have a court order. This includes the order of an administrative tribunal. However, the provider or plan may only disclose the information specifically described in the order.

If a HIPAA-covered entity receives a subpoena issued by someone other than a judge, it may disclose information only if the notification requirements of the Privacy Rule are met. This means that, before responding to the subpoena, the covered entity should receive evidence that reasonable efforts were made to notify the person who is the subject of the information about the request, so they have a chance to object to the disclosure. Alternatively, the covered entity should seek a qualified protective order for the information from the court.

Jury duty can result in a huge loss of privacy

Lawyers are often able to gather a lot of information about jurors through a questionnaire that jurors must fill out at the beginning of the selection process. Sometimes, lawyers are able to suggest questions to be included on the questionnaire. Lawyers representing wealthy clients often hire juror consultants who meticulously study the backgrounds of jurors and help shape every detail of the presentation of the case to resonate with particular jurors. Sometimes, lawyers hire private investigators to probe into the lives of jurors.

According to recent news, the American Bar Association (ABA) declares that it is ethical to examine anything that a juror has said publicly on a social media site. This can be done not just to choose a jury but also at any time during the trial. One company has developed software that promises to create a juror profile through social media posts and monitor jurors during the trial.

Beyond the probing into their private lives, juror privacy can be violated when details of their private lives are disclosed to the public. Juror questionnaires can be accessed by the public in some circumstances. These questionnaires can ask for very sensitive information — details about a person’s family, reading habits, groups that a person belongs to, beliefs, prior instances of being a crime victim, and sometimes information about health and being a victim of sexual assault.

Jurors are often promised that their answers to the questionnaires will be kept confidential, but this promise isn’t always kept. A number of courts have held that the First Amendment provides for a public right to access jury trials and that this right includes information obtained during the juror selection process.

Jury duty is a civic responsibility

The role of a juror is crucial in our country's democratic process. Juries make important decisions that affect people's lives and the community. Without juries, our legal system would come to a halt. Serving on a jury is an opportunity to gain insight into the legal process and ensure that all citizens have access to justice. It is a chance to work and deliberate with others who strive for fairness in the courts.

In a civil case, a jury's duty is to decide on issues of fact in disputes over matters such as property rights, contract rights, and damages for personal injury. In a criminal case, individuals who serve on juries play a vital role in protecting life, liberty, and property. The most important function of a juror is to listen to all the evidence presented at the trial and decide the facts of the case impartially.

Frequently asked questions