The Legal Status Of Illegal Immigrants: Lawbreakers Or Victims?

Immigration is a highly debated topic in the United States, with hundreds of thousands of people deliberately violating the nation's laws by unlawfully crossing U.S. borders each year. The consequences of illegal immigration are far-reaching, including the strain on public funds, overcrowding in classrooms and housing, and a compromise of national security. While the Biden administration has been blamed for the border crisis, the Trump administration has also been accused of weaponizing immigration laws to demonize immigrants and tear apart families and communities. This has led to the mass incarceration of communities of color, with migration-related offenses being the most prosecuted federal crimes in the country.

Consequences of illegal immigration: drain on public funds, overcrowding, and security risks

Illegal immigration is a highly contentious issue, with far-reaching consequences. It is a divisive topic in the political sphere, with some arguing that it has a detrimental impact on a country and its citizens, while others emphasize the humanitarian crisis and the need for reform. One of the primary concerns surrounding illegal immigration is the perceived drain on public funds. Opponents of illegal immigration argue that accommodating the needs of undocumented immigrants, often poor and unskilled, puts a strain on public services, including education, healthcare, and welfare. This, they argue, undermines the quality of these services for citizens.

The issue of overcrowding is also a significant point of contention. With an ever-increasing number of immigrants, legal and illegal, entering a country each year, the population is projected to rise sharply. This growth in population can impact the quality of life for citizens, leading to overcrowding in schools and increased demand for limited affordable housing. It also puts pressure on natural resources, contributing to environmental issues such as pollution, loss of farmland, and water shortages.

Another concern is the potential impact on security. With illegal immigrants often entering a country undetected, there are worries that individuals with malicious intentions, such as terrorists, could exploit this to enter and hide within the country. This perceived security risk has led to increased measures to secure borders and crack down on illegal immigration.

The consequences of illegal immigration are complex and multifaceted, impacting various aspects of society, from public finances and resources to security and quality of life. While there are humanitarian considerations, the issue of illegal immigration continues to be a divisive and challenging issue for governments to address.

Legal consequences of illegal border crossings: deportation, bans on re-entry, fines, and imprisonment

Illegal border crossings can result in a range of legal consequences, including deportation, bans on re-entry, fines, and imprisonment. These penalties are designed to deter people from entering a country without proper authorisation and to enforce immigration laws.

Deportation

Deportation is one of the most common consequences of illegal border crossings. When individuals are caught crossing a border illegally, they are often immediately deported back to their country of origin. This involves being removed from the country and denied entry, sometimes even before their case is fully processed. Deportation can be a traumatic and life-altering experience for those involved, separating families and disrupting lives.

Bans on Re-entry

In addition to deportation, individuals who cross borders illegally may face bans on re-entering the country. These bans can vary in length, ranging from a few years to permanent exclusion. Re-entry bans are often imposed to deter repeat offences and can make it challenging for individuals to seek asylum or escape dangerous situations in their home countries.

Fines

Fines are also a common consequence of illegal border crossings. The amount of the fine can vary depending on the country and the circumstances of the crossing. For example, in the United States, the first offence may include a civil penalty fine of $50 to $250, while subsequent offences can result in higher fines. These fines can create a financial burden for individuals and families, often compounding the challenges they face.

Imprisonment

In many cases, illegal border crossings can lead to imprisonment. The length of imprisonment can vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specifics of the case. For instance, in the US, a first offence may result in up to six months in prison, while subsequent offences can lead to longer sentences of up to two years or more. Imprisonment can be a significant deterrent for those considering illegal border crossings and can have severe impacts on the individuals involved.

The legal consequences of illegal border crossings are designed to enforce immigration laws and protect national security. However, it is important to recognise that these consequences can have significant impacts on the lives of those affected, and each case is unique and complex.

US border crossing laws: improper entry, unlawful presence, and marriage/entrepreneurship fraud

US border crossing laws are outlined in the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 275 and U.S. Code Title 8, Section 1325. These laws define improper entry, unlawful presence, and fraud as criminal offences, with civil penalties for those who break them.

Improper Entry

Improper entry is when an individual enters the US at a time or place other than that designated by immigration officers, or by eluding examination by immigration officers. This includes crossing the border at an unguarded border crossing without being inspected, or entering based on false or misleading information. The consequences for improper entry include civil fines of $50 to $250, imprisonment of up to six months, or both. For subsequent improper entries, the civil penalty fine is twice the amount of the first fine, and imprisonment can be up to two years.

Unlawful Presence

Unlawful presence is when an individual stays in the US after entering the country unlawfully. This includes overstaying a visa or remaining in the US after improper entry. There are some exceptions to unlawful presence, including being illegally in the US as a minor, being a victim of abuse or human trafficking, or having applied for an extension of stay.

Marriage Fraud

Marriage fraud is when an individual knowingly enters into a marriage for the purpose of evading immigration laws. This is punishable by up to five years in prison, a fine of up to $250,000, or both. The Immigration Marriage Fraud Amendments Act of 1986 added a penalty of five years' imprisonment and a $250,000 fine for marriage fraud.

Entrepreneurship Fraud

Entrepreneurship fraud is when an individual knowingly establishes a commercial enterprise to evade immigration laws. This carries a penalty of up to five years in prison, civil fines, or both.

Immigration laws: double punishment for immigrants with criminal records

Immigration laws in the United States have been a topic of debate and controversy for years. The country has seen a significant increase in illegal immigration, with an estimated 17 million illegal immigrants currently residing in the country. This has led to a range of enforcement measures and policies aimed at deterring, apprehending, and removing illegal immigrants.

The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) outlines the grounds for inadmissibility and deportation of individuals with criminal records. The INA categorizes crimes into two main types for immigration purposes: crimes of moral turpitude and aggravated felonies. Crimes of moral turpitude refer to any act that goes against justice, honesty, or good morals, as well as fraud, vileness, or depravity. Aggravated felonies include serious crimes such as murder, rape, sexual abuse of a minor, drug offenses, explosives or firearms trafficking, and money laundering, among others.

Under the INA, immigrants with criminal records may face double punishment, including the possibility of detention and automatic deportation to unfamiliar or dangerous countries. This has led to family separation and community disruption, as seen in the case of NIJC client Fernando, who was convicted of drug possession charges and served three months in jail. Instead of being reunited with his family, Fernando was immediately put into deportation proceedings by ICE officials, resulting in another year of separation.

The Trump administration's zero-tolerance policy, implemented in April 2018, further fueled the mass incarceration of communities of color and the separation of families. This policy instructed federal prosecutors to prioritize charging migrants with illegal entry and re-entry violations, resulting in a 98% increase in criminal prosecutions for these offenses from 2017 to 2019. The prosecutions were conducted in mass hearings that raised serious due process concerns, with individuals having limited access to legal counsel and translation services.

The impact of these immigration laws extends beyond the individuals charged, as spouses and parents are often separated from their children, who are then placed in shelters or foster homes. The financial cost of implementing these laws is also significant, with the incarceration costs for improper entry and re-entry prosecutions totaling $7 billion over the last decade.

To address these issues, advocates are calling for the decriminalization of immigration and the implementation of compassionate and fair immigration policies. The New Way Forward Act aims to separate immigration laws from the criminal legal system, end mandatory detention, and provide immigrants with access to social services and medical and mental health resources.

Criminalization of immigrants: incarceration, deportation, racial profiling, and family separation

The criminalization of immigrants involves incarceration, deportation, racial profiling, and family separation. Incarceration rates are higher for immigrants than for native-born citizens, and this disparity has existed for decades. The United States is witnessing a "great expulsion" of immigrants, both lawfully and unlawfully present, who are often non-violent and have deep roots in the country. This campaign of deportation is frequently justified as a war against "illegality", but it fails to explain the banishment of lawful permanent residents who have committed minor offenses and have families in the country.

The criminalization of immigration is driven by the expansion of the infrastructure for immigrant detention and the privatization of the prison system. Private prison corporations, such as Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and The GEO Group, have a vested financial interest in the incarceration of immigrants and influence legislation to increase the flow of prisoners into their prisons. This conflict of interest contributes to the growing trend of criminalizing immigration.

Deportation policies further exemplify the criminalization of immigrants. The United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has been instructed by Congress to fill 34,000 beds in detention facilities with immigrant detainees daily. This inmate quota would not be tolerated if applied to native-born prisoners. The Trump administration's "border czar", Tom Homan, has vowed to resume the controversial policy of putting families with children in detention centers as part of a drive to deport undocumented immigrants. Homan has also stated that officials would not hesitate to deport parents with US-born children, leaving the decision to split up their families to the immigrants.

Racial profiling is another aspect of the criminalization of immigrants. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers have been accused of violating constitutional rights during arrests, targeting individuals based on their ethnicity, and conducting searches without warrants. While ICE claims that its agents are forbidden from racial profiling, advocates and judges argue that the logic governing immigration rulings emboldens officers to trample over constitutional rights. The system is backed by decades-old court rulings that consider undocumented immigrants to be in continuous violation of the law, giving officers latitude to factor in physical appearance when making immigration arrests.

In conclusion, the criminalization of immigrants involves incarceration, deportation, racial profiling, and family separation. The United States' immigration policies and enforcement mechanisms contribute to the stigmatization of immigrants as "criminals", despite evidence that immigrants are less likely to commit serious crimes or be incarcerated than native-born citizens. The expansion of the immigrant detention infrastructure, the privatization of prisons, and the use of racial profiling in immigration enforcement further exacerbate the criminalization of immigrants.

Frequently asked questions