Abortions: Are Laws Making Them Safer?

Abortion laws are making abortions safer. In places where abortion is legal and accessible, people can get abortions without risking their health and safety. However, in places where abortion is stigmatized, criminalized, or restricted, people are forced to resort to unsafe abortions, which can lead to fatal consequences such as maternal deaths and disabilities. Restrictive abortion laws do not reduce the number of abortions but instead compel women to seek out unsafe and illegal abortion care, risking their lives and health. According to the World Health Organization, 23,000 women die from unsafe abortions each year, and tens of thousands more experience significant health complications.

The role of knowledge

Knowledge is a key factor in women's decisions regarding how, when, and where to terminate a pregnancy. This includes knowledge of the abortion law and knowledge of methods and sources of abortion.

Women's understanding of the abortion law, regardless of whether their knowledge was accurate, was associated with fear of potential legal or other repercussions of seeking care at a formal health facility. This perception restricted women's choices and led them to use less medically safe abortion methods and sources. Many women who were unsure of the law or who had anxiety about whether their situation qualified as a legal indication tended to seek abortion outside the formal health sector.

Learning about the conditions under which women could seek or be eligible for legal abortion services tended to positively impact women's abortion-related decision-making, giving them more confidence to advocate for themselves and make well-informed decisions. The process of learning about available legal services was often facilitated by an advocacy group or legitimate service provider.

Lacking awareness of abortion methods and sources was common and was an obstacle to women using a medically safe method or source. This lack of knowledge led to delays, which in effect limited their options as a result of later gestation age. Whether a woman had or could access information about safe abortion methods and sources was often related to her demographics. Rural, older, and less educated women, as well as those with less social capital, were unlikely to have adequate information to make an informed decision and use a safe method.

In societies where abortion is highly stigmatized, women tend to lack access to information about safe abortion methods or where they can be procured. Even in countries with more permissive laws, participants were often unaware of them because of the shroud of taboo.

Knowledge of laws, sources, and methods play an important role in women's abortion decisions related to how, when, and where to abort. When women access accurate information, even in contexts with highly restrictive abortion laws, they make safer choices and can act more quickly, reducing delays and potential complications associated with later termination.

The role of safety

Safety plays a critical role in the abortion decision-making process, influencing women's choices about how, when, and where to terminate a pregnancy. This is particularly true in legally restrictive settings, where women's options may be limited and their decisions can have life-threatening consequences. Here are four to six paragraphs elaborating on the role of safety in the context of abortion:

Women's perceptions of safety, including medical, legal, and social safety, significantly shape their abortion decisions. They strongly prefer medically safe abortions but often have to weigh this against the fear of legal repercussions and social stigma. In many cases, concerns for legal and social safety override their preference for medical safety, leading them to choose riskier methods or seek clandestine providers. This dynamic is especially pronounced in highly stigmatized societies, where women often lack access to information about safe abortion methods and are driven to unsafe alternatives.

The availability of safe abortion services is closely linked to the legal framework surrounding abortion. Restrictive abortion laws do not reduce the number of abortions but instead push them underground, increasing the risk of unsafe procedures. In countries with such laws, women may turn to unskilled providers or attempt to self-induce abortions, endangering their health and lives. Restrictive laws also create barriers to accessing post-abortion care, as women may fear legal consequences or encounter health systems that lack the capacity to treat abortion-related complications.

The impact of restrictive abortion laws is disproportionately felt by marginalized groups, including young people, racial and ethnic minorities, people living in poverty, and rural communities. These groups often face greater challenges in accessing safe abortion services due to financial constraints, limited mobility, and inadequate health infrastructure in their regions. As a result, they are more likely to resort to unsafe abortion methods or delay seeking care, increasing the risks to their health and well-being.

The perception of medical safety is influenced by women's knowledge of abortion laws, methods, and sources. A lack of accurate information can lead to unsafe choices or delays in decision-making, as women navigate their limited options. Social networks also play a crucial role, as advice and experiences shared within these networks can either direct women toward safe abortions or reinforce unsafe practices. Additionally, individual demographics, such as age, education, and socioeconomic status, can impact the quality of information and resources available to women, influencing their abortion decisions.

Abortion-related stigma and social repercussions are significant factors influencing women's decisions. Fear of stigma can lead women, especially young and unmarried individuals, to choose riskier methods or seek abortions far from home to maintain discretion and avoid involving their families or communities. This dynamic underscores the complex interplay between medical, legal, and social safety concerns in women's abortion decision-making processes.

The role of social networks and the internet

Social networks play a significant role in influencing women's decisions about how and where to terminate a pregnancy. Women often consult their friends, partners, and family members when deciding how and where to abort. In some cases, women with strong networks may not use the internet or support services during the abortion-seeking process. However, the internet can be a valuable resource for women, providing information on abortion laws, methods, and services.

Women's social networks can have a significant influence on whether a woman has a safe or unsafe abortion. Friends and family members may recommend safe or unsafe abortion options, and their advice can impact a woman's perceptions of safety. Additionally, women with higher socioeconomic status and education, as well as those with connections to people in academic and health sectors, are more likely to experience safe abortions. On the other hand, women with limited information or connections in their social networks tend to have unsafe abortions.

The role of social networks in abortion decision-making varies across different cultural and institutional contexts. In some settings, abortion is highly stigmatized, and women may only disclose their plans to a small group of trusted individuals. In other settings, abortion may be more accepted, and women may feel more comfortable discussing their options with a wider range of people.

Overall, social networks play a crucial role in women's abortion decision-making, and their influence can have significant implications for women's health and well-being.

Cost, affordability and convenience

Cost, Affordability, and Convenience

The cost of an abortion varies depending on several factors, including the type of abortion, the stage of pregnancy, the state or health centre, and whether the patient has health insurance. Abortion pills can cost up to $800, while an in-clinic abortion can cost up to $800 in the first trimester and $1,500-$2,000 in the second trimester. These costs can be prohibitive for many people, especially those from marginalised communities, low-income backgrounds, or without insurance.

In the United States, the Affordable Care Act has made strides in expanding health insurance coverage and improving women's health and financial security. However, abortion restrictions, such as the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits the use of Medicaid for abortions, create additional financial barriers for low-income individuals. These restrictions disproportionately affect people of colour, who are more likely to be uninsured and face higher costs for abortion services.

The cost of abortion can push people to seek unsafe alternatives, especially in countries where abortion is criminalised or highly restricted. For example, in Morocco, where abortion is criminalised, clandestine abortions are often unaffordable for women living in poverty, forcing them to resort to unsafe procedures.

Affordability and convenience are also impacted by factors such as the ability to take time off work, travel to another state or country, and access to nearby health centres. People seeking abortions may struggle with the costs of transportation, lodging, and childcare, further adding to the financial burden.

To improve affordability and convenience, some organisations, like Planned Parenthood, offer financial assistance and resources for transportation, lodging, and childcare. Additionally, abortion funds and the National Network of Abortion Funds provide financial and logistical support for people seeking abortions in the United States.

The cost, affordability, and convenience of abortion are critical factors that influence an individual's access to safe and legal abortion services. Financial barriers can lead to delays in obtaining an abortion, increasing both the monetary cost and the risk of medical complications. Addressing these issues is essential to ensuring that abortion is accessible and affordable for all.

The impact of restrictive laws on maternal mortality

Restrictive abortion laws have a detrimental impact on maternal mortality, with people of colour, immigrants, and non-English speakers disproportionately affected. In the United States, Black birthing people are more than twice as likely to experience maternal mortality and morbidity compared to White birthing people. Restrictive abortion laws create geographic, transportation, and financial barriers to obtaining an abortion, which can result in increased rates of maternal death.

Research has shown that restrictive abortion laws do not prevent abortions but instead push them underground, increasing the risk of unsafe procedures and police reports. Unsafe abortions are the third leading cause of preventable maternal deaths worldwide and are the cause of five million largely preventable disabilities, according to the World Health Organization.

In countries with highly restrictive abortion laws, women's decisions on how, when, and where to terminate a pregnancy are influenced by their knowledge of the law, safety concerns, social networks, and cost affordability. These factors often lead women to choose riskier methods or services to maintain secrecy and avoid legal repercussions, stigma, and social repercussions.

Restrictive abortion laws also have a compounding impact on marginalised communities, as health services are generally less accessible to people on low incomes, refugees, migrants, LGBTI people, and racialised and Indigenous people.

Frequently asked questions