Trump's Family: Nepotism Laws Broken?

President Donald Trump's appointment of his son-in-law Jared Kushner and daughter Ivanka Trump to senior advisory roles in his administration has raised questions about potential violations of federal anti-nepotism laws. The anti-nepotism statute, passed after President Kennedy appointed his brother as Attorney General, aims to prevent the president from appointing family members to government positions. However, the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel concluded that the president is exempt from this statute when hiring White House employees, allowing Trump to appoint his son-in-law and daughter. This has sparked concerns about the integrity of the administration's policymaking and potential conflicts of interest, as both Kushner and Ivanka Trump have extensive business interests and lack relevant experience.

The White House is not considered a federal agency under the Freedom of Information Act

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is a federal law that gives the public the right to request access to government records. It was established in 1967 to make the functions of US government agencies more transparent and allow the American public to identify problems in government functioning.

The FOIA applies only to government agencies under the executive branch. It does not apply to the White House, which is not considered a federal agency under the act. The act outlines nine exemptions that define categories of information not subject to disclosure. These include national security, internal personnel rules, commercial interests, and personal privacy.

The FOIA has been repeatedly changed by both the legislative and executive branches. For example, in 1974, the Privacy Act was passed as a countervailing measure to ensure the security of government documents kept on private citizens. In 1982, President Ronald Reagan's Executive Order allowed federal agencies to withhold information relating to national security. This was altered in 1995 by President Clinton, who issued directives that allowed the release of previously classified national security documents more than 25 years old.

The FOIA has been invoked by news organizations for reporting purposes, though such uses make up less than 10% of all requests. It is more frequently used by businesses, law firms, and individuals.

While the FOIA does not apply to the White House, the appointment of Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump, son-in-law and daughter of former President Trump, to senior advisory roles in the White House appears to violate the anti-nepotism statute. The statute was passed to prevent the president from appointing family members to government positions. The Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel released an opinion concluding that the president is exempt from the anti-nepotism statute when hiring White House employees. However, critics argue that Trump's appointments violate the intended purpose of the statute and undermine the integrity of the administration's policymaking.

The Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel deemed the president exempt from anti-nepotism laws

The anti-nepotism statute was originally passed after President Kennedy appointed his brother as Attorney General. The statute aims to prevent the president from appointing family members to government positions. However, the Office of Legal Counsel's opinion concluded that the president is exempt from this statute when hiring White House employees. This interpretation has been criticized as violating the intended purpose of the anti-nepotism statute.

The appointments of Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump as presidential advisors raised concerns about their qualifications, potential conflicts of interest, and the integrity of the administration's policymaking. Kushner and Trump's lack of significant experience in policymaking and their extensive business interests prompted worries about their ability to effectively serve in these roles. Additionally, their appointments may inhibit other government employees from providing candid opinions, fearing alienation from the president's family members.

The concern regarding conflicts of interest was heightened by Kushner and Trump's refusal to place their assets in a blind trust. Kushner's extensive real estate holdings and Ivanka Trump's international fashion franchise created an ethical minefield, with overlapping financial interests with the president. Their appointments also raised questions about their primary allegiance, whether it be to the Constitution or to President Trump personally.

Despite these concerns, the Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel's interpretation allowed Trump to appoint his son-in-law and daughter as senior advisers, bypassing the anti-nepotism statute.

The anti-nepotism statute was passed after John F. Kennedy appointed his brother as attorney general

The anti-nepotism statute, also known as the "Bobby Kennedy Law", was passed after John F. Kennedy appointed his brother, Robert F. Kennedy, as Attorney General in 1961. The statute was added to the Postal Revenue and Federal Salary Act of 1967.

The law states that a "public official may not appoint, employ, promote, advance, or advocate for appointment, employment, promotion, or advancement... [of] any individual who is a relative of the public official" in a civilian position within the agency they are serving. The law applies to federal agencies and not the White House.

The anti-nepotism statute was passed in response to the widespread nepotism practiced by US presidents throughout history. John Adams, the second president of the United States, employed his son, John Quincy Adams, as a diplomat and appointed him as the United States minister to Prussia. Adams also appointed his son-in-law, William Stephens Smith, to several government positions, including a customs agent in New York.

Other presidents who engaged in nepotism include James Madison, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, John Tyler, James Buchanan, Zachary Taylor, Ulysses S. Grant, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, and Dwight Eisenhower. Kennedy himself also appointed his brother-in-law, Sargent Shriver, as the first head of the Peace Corps.

The anti-nepotism statute aims to prevent the president from appointing family members to government positions. However, there have been debates and legal challenges regarding the applicability of the statute to the president. Some argue that the president has the power to appoint family members to unofficial roles or advisory positions without violating the law, as long as they do not receive compensation.

Despite the anti-nepotism statute, President Trump appointed his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and his daughter, Ivanka Trump, to advisory roles in his administration. The Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel released an opinion concluding that the president is exempt from the anti-nepotism statute when hiring White House employees. However, critics argue that Trump's appointments violate the intended purpose of the statute and undermine the integrity of the administration's policymaking.

The anti-nepotism statute prohibits the president from appointing family members to government positions

The anti-nepotism statute, also known as Section 3110, prohibits executive agency officials from appointing relatives to civilian positions in the agency they are serving in or have jurisdiction over. The statute was passed in 1967 after President John F. Kennedy appointed his brother, Robert Kennedy, as Attorney General.

The statute specifies that the prohibition against hiring family members applies to the president and includes sons-in-law as family members. Despite this, President Trump appointed his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, as a senior advisor. Kushner's appointment appeared to violate the anti-nepotism statute, and Democrats in the House Judiciary Committee called for a review of the appointment. Ethics experts from both parties agreed that the appointment would violate anti-nepotism laws and raised concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

However, there has been debate about whether the statute applies to the president and whether the White House can be considered an "agency" of the executive branch. Some academics and legal experts argue that the statute does not apply to the president due to the powers vested by the Constitution's Appointments Clause. There is also a question of whether the statute only applies to paid government positions, as Kushner did not take a salary for his role.

Despite these arguments, the appointment of Jared Kushner as a senior advisor and the hiring of Ivanka Trump as a presidential advisor violate the intended purpose of the anti-nepotism statute, which is to prevent nepotism and ensure the integrity of the administration's policymaking.

The anti-nepotism statute includes sons-in-law in its definition of family members

The anti-nepotism statute, which was passed after President Kennedy appointed his brother as attorney general, includes sons-in-law in its definition of family members. The statute specifies that the prohibition against hiring family members applies to the president and that sons-in-law are family members. This statute aims to prevent the president from appointing family members to government positions.

Despite the statute, President Trump appointed his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, as a senior advisor and his daughter, Ivanka Trump, to a position in his administration. The Department of Justice's Office of Legal Counsel released an opinion concluding that the president is exempt from the anti-nepotism statute when hiring White House employees. This opinion, however, contradicts the intended purpose of the statute, which is to prevent nepotism and conflicts of interest in government.

The definition of "relative" in the anti-nepotism statute is broad and includes relationships by blood, marriage, or adoption. Specifically, a "relative" is defined as an individual related to a public official as a father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, and more. This definition makes it clear that a son-in-law is considered a family member under the statute.

The inclusion of sons-in-law in the anti-nepotism statute is important to maintain ethical standards and integrity in government. By appointing his son-in-law and daughter to positions of power, President Trump undermined the purpose of the statute and set a precedent for potential future violations. It is essential to uphold the principles of meritocracy and transparency in government appointments, rather than allowing personal and family connections to influence these decisions.

To summarize, the anti-nepotism statute clearly includes sons-in-law in its definition of family members, and Trump's appointment of his son-in-law and daughter can be seen as a violation of the statute's intended purpose. Maintaining ethical standards in government appointments is crucial to ensuring fair and transparent decision-making processes.

Frequently asked questions