Undercover Agents: To What Extent Can They Break The Law?

Undercover agents are individuals recruited by the police, security agencies, and other investigators to uncover and disrupt crime and serious threats to a nation. While the use of undercover or covert law enforcement is common, there is an ongoing debate about whether these agents should be allowed to break the law. The Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill, or the CHIS Bill, in the UK, for instance, has sparked controversy as it aims to protect undercover operatives from prosecution if they are forced to break the law and defines the circumstances in which operatives can commit crimes. Critics argue that such bills give security forces a licence to kill and enable human rights abuses, while supporters claim that they are necessary to protect the identities of undercover agents and maintain their cover in dangerous, long-term operations.

Are undercover agents allowed to commit violent crimes?

The Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill, also known as the CHIS Bill, is a piece of legislation in the UK that creates a licence for undercover agents and informants to commit crimes as part of their work. This bill covers 13 law enforcement and government agencies, including the police, the National Crime Agency, the armed forces, and the Prison Service. While the bill provides a legal framework for undercover agents to commit crimes, it does not explicitly address violent crimes.

The bill states that any authorisation for criminal conduct by undercover agents must take into account the requirements of the Human Rights Act, which includes the right to life, the prohibition of torture, and the prohibition of subjecting someone to inhuman or degrading treatment. This implies that agencies would not authorise acts of violence, but critics argue that the bill does not provide clear enough guidelines.

In the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has guidelines in place that prohibit undercover agents from engaging in violent acts unless done in self-defence. Additionally, the guidelines state that undercover agents must not initiate illegal activities to avoid possible entrapment defences. However, there have been concerns and controversies regarding the use of undercover agents in both the UK and the US, particularly regarding the potential for abuse of power and the infringement of civil rights.

Overall, while undercover agents may be authorised to commit certain crimes as part of their investigations, the specifics vary depending on the country, agency, and legal framework. The authorisation for violent crimes is particularly controversial and subject to ongoing debate and scrutiny.

Can undercover agents be prosecuted for crimes committed during operations?

The Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill, or CHIS, creates a licence for undercover agents and informants to commit crimes as part of their work. The bill also seeks to define the circumstances in which operatives can commit crimes and protect undercover operatives from prosecution if they are forced to break the law during operations.

The bill covers 13 law enforcement and government agencies, including the police, the National Crime Agency, the armed forces, and the Prison Service. It is important to note that the bill does not give undercover agents a "licence to kill". The Human Rights Act, which includes the right to life, the prohibition of torture, and the prohibition of subjecting someone to inhuman or degrading treatment, provides the upper limits on what operatives can be authorised to do.

The use of undercover agents can be highly intrusive and invasive, as it involves surveillance and the infiltration of a wide range of community activities, including confidential and privileged relationships. It is a concerning exception to the requirement that officers be truthful in their interactions with the public.

The involvement of undercover agents in criminal activity should be limited to the most high-value investigations. Written policies should include substantive limits to ensure that the risk of injury to officers and the public is minimised. Appropriate justifications for undercover agents' participation in illegal activities include obtaining necessary information or evidence, establishing or maintaining a cover identity, and preventing death or serious bodily injury.

The authorisation and supervision of undercover operations are crucial to ensuring that agents do not exceed their scope and that their activities are carefully monitored. The U.S. Attorney General's guidelines for Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) undercover operations require that undercover agents may not engage in conduct that violates federal, state, or local law unless their participation is both justified and minimised.

While the use of undercover agents can be invaluable to law enforcement, it is essential to carefully consider the potential risks and impacts on the public, officers, and the legitimacy of law enforcement itself.

What are the limits of an undercover agent's powers?

The limits of an undercover agent's powers are a highly debated topic, with critics fearing that such agents have a ""licence to kill"" and can commit human rights abuses with limited oversight. On the other hand, supporters argue that these powers are necessary to protect national security and maintain their cover while infiltrating criminal organisations.

In the UK, the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill, or CHIS Bill, aims to provide a "clear and consistent statutory basis" for defining the circumstances in which undercover agents can commit crimes. The Bill covers 13 law enforcement and government agencies, including the police, the National Crime Agency, the Armed Forces, and the Prison Service. It protects operatives from prosecution if they are forced to break the law and authorises them to commit specific crimes as part of their job. However, the Bill does not explicitly list the crimes that agents are allowed to commit, stating only that authorisations must "take into account" the requirements of the Human Rights Act.

While the Human Rights Act provides some guarantees, such as the right to life and the prohibition of torture and inhuman treatment, critics argue that this is not enough. They point to similar laws in the US and Canada, which explicitly ban agents from involvement in killing, sexual violence, and other serious crimes. In response to these concerns, the UK government has emphasised the importance of ""deep and retrospective oversight"" and regular inspections to hold the security services accountable.

In practice, undercover agents are generally required to obtain prior approval from their superiors before committing any crimes. This approval is typically granted for minor crimes that are deemed necessary to maintain their cover, such as purchasing drugs. For more serious crimes, such as bribery or violence, explicit authorisation is usually required. However, exceptions can be made if an agent feels their life is in danger or if they need to act in self-defence.

The extent of an undercover agent's powers also depends on the country and the agency they are working for. For example, in the US, informants have been granted blanket immunity for minor or agreed-upon crimes in exchange for their testimony. Similarly, in the UK, informants have been allowed to break the law in exchange for valuable information.

While undercover agents do have the power to break the law, it is important to note that they are still subject to certain restrictions and oversight mechanisms. However, the specific limits of their powers vary depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the operation.

Can undercover agents be recruited from former criminals?

Undercover agents are recruited to help the police, security agencies, and other investigators uncover and disrupt crime and serious threats to a nation. They are often former criminals themselves or individuals involved in offences related to the main target's activity, who can convincingly pass themselves off as someone to be trusted. For instance, an investigator might need to recruit a known cigarette smuggler to help gather intelligence on a highly dangerous gang, which would involve the informant engaging in criminal activity again.

In the UK, the Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill aims to protect undercover operatives from prosecution if they are forced to break the law on operations. It also seeks to define the circumstances in which operatives can commit crimes. However, it does not specify which crimes can be committed, only that an authorisation must "take into account" the requirements of the Human Rights Act. This has been a source of controversy, with critics arguing that it does not clearly outline the limits of an agent's power.

In most jurisdictions, undercover officers are restricted from encouraging suspects to commit crimes they would not ordinarily commit. Their primary role is to infiltrate existing criminal enterprises. The recruitment process for undercover agents typically involves rigorous background checks, polygraph examinations, and oral interviews. Candidates must be physically fit, skilled in firearms use, and possess the temperament and personality suited for the job.

Therefore, while it is not uncommon for undercover agents to be recruited from former criminals, the process of becoming an undercover agent involves extensive vetting and training to ensure they can effectively carry out their duties within legal and ethical boundaries.

How do undercover agents maintain their cover?

Undercover agents, or Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS), are individuals who are placed in specific settings to covertly gather information. They are often recruited by the police, security agencies, and other investigators to uncover and disrupt crime and serious threats to the nation.

Maintaining their cover is essential for the success of their operations and their safety. Here are some ways undercover agents maintain their cover:

• Developing a convincing cover story: Undercover agents need to create a believable backstory or legend that fits the target environment. They may pose as someone with a criminal past or as an addict to gain the trust of the individuals they are investigating.
• Blending into the target environment: Undercover agents must be able to fit into the target group or organization without arousing suspicion. This may involve changing their appearance, such as growing long hair or a beard, or adopting specific mannerisms or behaviours to match the group they are infiltrating.
• Maintaining a passive attitude: During drug deals, undercover agents should maintain a passive or apathetic attitude, negotiating prices but not paying more than the normal street rate, as only a police officer would be willing to do so.
• Rehearsing answers to common questions: Undercover agents need to be able to think on their feet and provide convincing answers to questions that dealers or criminals may ask, such as how they know the informant or how the undercover agent knows they are not a police officer.
• Using technology: Undercover agents may use hidden audio and video recording devices to capture evidence and maintain their cover. They may also communicate with their team using concealed audio devices or "wires."
• Working outside their ordinary jurisdiction: Undercover agents often work in areas where they are less likely to be recognized, reducing the chance of being identified as a police officer.
• Using informants: Informants can facilitate introductions to dealers or criminals and provide credibility to the undercover agent's cover story.
• Adopting a streetwise attitude: Undercover agents must be able to maintain control and not allow themselves to be manipulated or controlled by the individuals they are investigating. They need to be able to adapt to changing circumstances, such as meeting locations, to maintain the upper hand.

While undercover agents use these strategies to maintain their cover, it is important to note that their work is demanding, dangerous, and not suited for everyone.

Frequently asked questions