City Ordinances: Overriding State Laws?

The relationship between city ordinances and state laws is a complex one, with variations across different states and countries. In the United States, for instance, the general principle is that state laws supersede municipal ordinances in the event of a conflict. However, this relationship is not always straightforward, as exemplified by cases such as State ex rel. Jennings v. City of Seaford, where a local ordinance in Seaford, Delaware, conflicted with state law, resulting in legal challenges. The concept of preemption, grounded in the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution, underscores the understanding that federal law takes precedence over conflicting state laws. Similarly, the doctrine of state preemption allows state governments to nullify local laws that deviate from or conflict with state statutes. Nevertheless, as seen in the case of Kirk v. City of Morgan Hill, California's recognition of cities' broad powers in certain domains, such as gun control, can result in local ordinances that impose stricter regulations than state laws without being preempted.

Local ordinances can be used to block abortion clinics from operating

Generally, state laws override municipal ordinances. However, in some cases, local ordinances can be used to block abortion clinics from operating, even in states where abortion is legal. For instance, in November 2022, the city of Hobbs in New Mexico, a state controlled by the Democratic Party, passed an ordinance designed to ban abortions. This ordinance, known as a "sanctuary city for the unborn", blocks abortion clinics from operating within the city limits. This move was led by Mark Lee Dickson, the head of the Right to Life of East Texas, who aimed to replicate this success in other Democratic-controlled states where abortion is legal.

Local ordinances can be used to regulate businesses and residential areas, addressing issues such as public safety, land use, and real estate. In the context of abortion clinics, local governments can pass ordinances to create "buffer zones" or "access zones" around these facilities, which restrict protests and other forms of opposition to designated areas at a certain distance from the clinic. These zones aim to ensure that women have safe access to abortion services by preventing the blockade of clinic entrances, protecting the safety of patients and staff, and reducing the potential for intimidation or harassment by anti-abortion activists.

The effectiveness of these local ordinances in blocking abortion clinics depends on various factors, including the specific wording of the ordinance, the local political landscape, and the legal challenges that may arise. For example, in West Palm Beach, Florida, a 20-foot buffer zone and noise ordinance were approved in 2005, but a judge found it to infringe on the right to free speech and ordered it to be enjoined. On the other hand, in Toronto, Ontario, a 500-foot fixed buffer zone was established around doctors' homes, demonstrating the variation in the scope and enforcement of these local ordinances.

It is worth noting that, in some states, local laws cannot duplicate state law, and certain subjects are prohibited from being covered by local ordinances. For example, in Maryland, local governments are expressly prohibited from passing gun control laws or ordinances related to firearm possession and ownership, as these matters are exclusively controlled by state laws. Therefore, while local ordinances can play a role in blocking abortion clinics from operating, they must adhere to the specific legal framework and limitations of the state in which they are enacted.

Local ordinances can complicate operations for businesses

Local ordinances are laws enacted by municipal or county governments to regulate matters within their jurisdiction. They often cover areas like zoning, noise control, business licensing requirements, and public health. While these ordinances are important for addressing the specific needs of a particular area, they can sometimes complicate operations for businesses operating in multiple jurisdictions.

For example, a business may need to navigate different zoning regulations, business licensing requirements, and noise control ordinances in each city or county where they operate. This can be particularly challenging for businesses with multiple locations or those that operate in multiple states. In some cases, local ordinances may even conflict with state laws, further complicating compliance for businesses.

To ensure compliance with relevant regulations and avoid legal issues, businesses should be aware of the hierarchy of laws, with state laws generally holding superior authority over local ordinances. This is known as the principle of preemption, which means that a higher authority's laws take precedence over those of a lower authority. However, the relationship between state laws and local ordinances can be complex, and there may be instances where the preemption is not explicitly stated.

For instance, in some states, local ordinances are prohibited from duplicating state laws on certain subjects. An example is Maryland, where cities, towns, and counties are expressly prohibited from passing local gun control laws, and state laws on firearm possession, carrying, and ownership exclusively control. In other cases, local ordinances may impose stricter standards or penalties than state laws, as long as they do not create a lesser penalty for a crime or traffic offense.

To navigate these complexities, businesses may seek guidance from legal experts or business attorneys who can help litigate any legal issues that arise due to conflicting regulations. By staying informed about the laws and ordinances in their operating areas, businesses can ensure compliance and avoid potential legal pitfalls.

Local ordinances can address public safety, land use, and real estate

In the United States, local ordinances are enforced in addition to state and federal laws. Local ordinances can address public safety, land use, and real estate.

Local zoning ordinances can apply to businesses and residential areas. They regulate what uses are allowed on a particular property, the minimum and maximum size of a property, how densely a property can be developed, and the maximum building size that can be built on a property. For example, an ordinance may designate an area for industrial use only, or it may set regulations for dimensions, placement of utilities, parking, and types of buildings.

Zoning ordinances were implemented to protect the health and safety of the population. They can also protect property owners in residential zones who rely on affordable housing. For example, an easement might prevent someone from building on a parcel of real property, preserving an open green space for the benefit of the public as a whole.

Building codes established and enforced in municipalities regulate the construction of buildings and other structures to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public. These codes can be based on state, national, or international models, but they are often modified to meet the unique goals and resources of the municipality.

While local ordinances can address many important issues, it is important to note that they are generally overridden by state laws in the case of a conflict. Additionally, some subjects are completely prohibited from being covered by local ordinance, and local law cannot duplicate state law.

Local ordinances can be used to establish municipal standards in gun control

In the United States, local ordinances are laws that are enforced at the local level, in addition to state and federal laws. Local ordinances can be used to establish municipal standards in gun control, as seen in the example of Richmond, Virginia, where local officials banned guns at a white supremacist protest. However, due to the state's preemption laws, the officials had to lift the ban on gun carrying. This example highlights the complex relationship between local ordinances and state laws, where local ordinances may be overridden by state preemption in certain cases.

The power to establish local ordinances varies across different states and municipalities. For instance, in Maryland, cities, towns, and counties are prohibited from passing gun control laws or ordinances related to the possession, carrying, and ownership of firearms or ammunition. The state of Maryland retains exclusive control over these matters. On the other hand, states like California and Colorado allow local governments to retain substantial authority to regulate firearms and ammunition, although there are certain areas where the state legislature has expressly removed this authority, such as the regulation of imitation firearms.

When conflicts arise between local ordinances and state laws, courts are often called upon to determine whether the ordinance is valid or if it violates state law or the state constitution. The courts consider factors such as the intent of the legislature, the purpose of the state law, and whether the local law conflicts with or frustrates the state law. For example, in Massachusetts, the courts upheld a local firearm discharge ban, finding that it did not conflict with the state's hunting license law, even though the local law was more stringent.

It is important to note that local ordinances cannot be used to create lesser penalties for crimes or traffic offenses than those established by state law. This is because the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution treats local ordinances and state laws equally for criminal processing purposes. As a result, individuals cannot be prosecuted under both a local ordinance and a state law for the same offense, and a conviction or acquittal under one precludes a second trial under the other.

Local ordinances can make local public health orders enforceable by civil action

Generally, state laws override municipal ordinances. However, local ordinances can be used to address public health issues, filling gaps in federal or state public health laws by focusing on critical areas of public health concern that might otherwise be unregulated. Local governments are empowered by "home rule" statutes to address specific local public health issues through local laws. These ordinances are usually passed by elected officials within a municipality and can address issues such as food handling, physical activity, outside burning, and smoking, which may be handled differently depending on the local context.

Local ordinances can also enforce public health orders through administrative, civil, or criminal remedies. The administrative approach is more informal and can be handled by city staff, typically beginning with warnings and notices, followed by office conferences to mediate and establish agreements. Civil action is often taken when violations are substantial, and other remedies have been ineffective. Cities may prefer this approach due to its lower burden of proof and the absence of a jury trial in most cases. Criminal approaches, on the other hand, can be faster and less costly, resulting in fines and jail time, but they may not directly address the abatement of violations.

In some states, local laws cannot duplicate state laws, and certain subjects are prohibited from being covered by local ordinances. For example, in Maryland, local governments are prohibited from passing gun control laws, with state laws holding exclusive control over such matters. Additionally, local ordinances must comply with any overlapping statutes and be related to the affairs of the local government. While local ordinances in the United States are enforced in addition to state and federal laws, they must not conflict with the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment, which prohibits prosecuting an individual under both local and state laws for the same offense.

Frequently asked questions