Martial Law: Government Shutdown And Its Ramifications

Martial law is a legal term for when military authorities assume governance and law enforcement from civilian authorities. In the United States, martial law may be declared by the President or a State governor, but such a proclamation is not necessary. The U.S. Constitution does not define or specify who can declare martial law, and it does not explicitly grant the President the power to do so. However, the President and State officials can declare degrees of martial law in specific circumstances. In this context, a government shutdown refers to a cessation of civilian government functions, which could potentially trigger a declaration of martial law. However, it is important to note that martial law is considered a last resort due to its potential for abuse as a political tool.

Martial law and the suspension of civil liberties

Martial law is a "dramatic departure from normal practice in the United States". It involves the temporary substitution of civilian rule with military authority and is usually invoked in times of war, rebellion, or natural disaster. It has been declared nine times since World War II, and in five instances, it was designed to counter resistance to federal desegregation decrees in the South.

Martial law is a somewhat vague legal term for when military authorities take control of civil governance and law enforcement. During martial law, executive or military leaders may suspend certain civil liberties. It is intended to be reserved for times of extreme emergencies when existing civilian government and law enforcement have ceased to function or become ineffective. The purpose is to create order and control the population to achieve a more significant goal. Ideally, it is used to maintain order when a high number of U.S. citizens are in immediate, mortal danger.

Examples of actions that can take place during martial law include curfews for citizens and restricting public gatherings to prevent civil unrest. All civilian laws are suspended for the duration of martial law. Military leaders may create and enforce their own laws, and may detain people and take over local governments and their responsibilities. They have virtually unlimited authority to make and enforce laws.

In the United States, martial law may be declared by proclamation of the President or a State governor, but such a formal proclamation is not necessary. Although the U.S. Constitution makes no specific provision for the imposition of martial law, nearly every State has a constitutional provision authorizing the government to impose it. The power of martial law, once held to be nearly absolute, has limitations; for example, civilians may not be tried by military tribunals as long as civilian courts are functional.

In the United States, both the President and Congress have the power, within certain constraints, to impose martial law since both can be in charge of the militia. However, the Constitution does not explicitly grant the President the power to declare martial law.

The US President's power to impose martial law

The concept of martial law in the United States is closely tied to the right of habeas corpus, which is the right to a hearing and trial on lawful imprisonment. Martial law involves the temporary substitution of military authority for civilian rule and is usually invoked in times of war, rebellion, or natural disaster. It is intended to be a last resort, reserved for times of extreme emergencies when existing civilian government and law enforcement have ceased to function or become ineffective.

The US Constitution does not explicitly define when a president can declare martial law, nor does it specifically forbid it. Some scholars believe the president has the executive power to declare martial law, while others believe congressional authorization is needed. The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 and the Insurrection Act of 1807 are two federal laws that impact the president's ability to declare martial law. The former prevents the US military from participating in civilian law enforcement activities, while the latter allows the president to deploy military forces to address rebellions and domestic violence within the US.

The Supreme Court has never explicitly ruled that the president or federal government can declare martial law. In 1866, the Supreme Court ruled that President Lincoln's imposition of martial law by suspending habeas corpus was unconstitutional in areas where local courts were still operational. In another instance, the Court held that when civilian courts are functioning, the military cannot use military tribunals for civilians accused of non-war crimes.

While the president can call on the military to assist local governments after natural disasters, it is usually limited in scope. In summary, the power to declare martial law is ambiguous, and it is not clear what actions Congress or citizens could take if a president were to declare it without cause.

Instances of martial law in US history

Martial law is a rare occurrence in the United States, with a vague definition. It involves the military taking control of civil governance and law enforcement, usually in times of war, rebellion, or natural disaster. It is intended as a last resort to be used in extreme emergencies when civilian governance has ceased to function. Martial law has been declared nine times since World War II, five of which were to counter resistance to federal desegregation decrees in the South. In the 90 years between the start of the Civil War and the end of World War II, it was declared at least 60 times. Another source states that it has been imposed at least 68 times, usually in limited, local areas.

During the American Revolutionary Period

British authorities imposed martial law in several instances to suppress colonial resistance and maintain control. For example, in Boston in 1774, the British Parliament passed the Intolerable Acts, one of which effectively placed Boston under martial law by closing its port and restricting town meetings. In 1775, the royal governor of Virginia, Lord Dunmore, issued a proclamation declaring martial law and offering freedom to indentured servants and enslaved individuals who joined British forces.

The Civil War

Congress declared martial law during the Civil War, imposing it on border states like Missouri and Kentucky, where US forces battled Confederate insurgents. On September 15, 1863, President Lincoln imposed martial law on Kentucky, Maryland, and Missouri, allowing him to suspend habeas corpus and civil rights throughout the US.

Post-Civil War to World War II

In the years between the Civil War and World War II, martial law was limited by several court decisions. For example, in 1878, Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids US military involvement in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval.

The 1930s

Oklahoma Governor William Murray declared martial law at least six times, and perhaps more than 30 times, during his tenure in the 1930s.

Post-World War II

Since World War II, martial law has been declared nine times in the US. In 1963, it was declared during the Civil Rights Movement in response to the Cambridge riot.

Other Instances

Martial law has also been declared after major disasters, such as the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, and during riots, such as the Omaha race riot of 1919, the 1920 Lexington riots, and the 1934 West Coast waterfront strike.

Martial law as a political tool

Martial law is a dramatic departure from normal practice in the United States. It involves the temporary substitution of military authority for civilian rule and is usually invoked in times of war, rebellion, or natural disaster. Martial law has been declared nine times since World War II and, in five instances, was designed to counter resistance to federal desegregation decrees in the South.

Martial law is a somewhat vague legal term for when military authorities take control of civil governance and law enforcement. During martial law, the executive or military leaders may suspend certain civil liberties. It is intended to be reserved for times of extreme emergencies when existing civilian government and law enforcement have ceased to function or become ineffective. The purpose is to create order and control the population to achieve a higher goal. Ideally, it is used to maintain order when a high number of U.S. citizens are in immediate, mortal danger.

Martial law can be easily abused as a political tool to control the population, especially political dissenters. For example, state governors have declared martial law during times of labor unrest, although not recently. Even at the time, it was considered controversial. Declaring martial law is typically a last resort.

In the United States, martial law may be declared by proclamation of the President or a State governor, but such a formal proclamation is not necessary. Although the U.S. Constitution makes no specific provision for the imposition of martial law, nearly every State has a constitutional provision authorizing the government to impose martial law. The power of martial law, once held to be nearly absolute, has limitations; for example, civilians may not be tried by military tribunals as long as civilian courts are functional.

The legality of martial law

Martial law is a somewhat vague legal term for when military authorities take control of civil governance and law enforcement. It is intended to be reserved for times of extreme emergencies when existing civilian government and law enforcement have ceased to function or become ineffective. Martial law involves the temporary substitution of military authority for civilian rule and is usually invoked in times of war, rebellion, or natural disaster.

In the United States, martial law may be declared by proclamation of the President or a State governor, but such a formal proclamation is not necessary. Although the U.S. Constitution makes no specific provision for the imposition of martial law, nearly every State has a constitutional provision authorizing the government to impose martial law. The power of martial law, once held to be nearly absolute, has limitations; for example, civilians may not be tried by military tribunals as long as civilian courts are functional. Nonetheless, within the bounds of court decisions, a military commander's authority under martial law is virtually unlimited.

U.S. courts have largely remained silent on martial law. However, in 1946, the U.S. Supreme Court held that when civilian courts are in operation, the military cannot substitute military tribunals for civilians accused of non-war crimes. There are few other Supreme Court cases discussing the extent of a president or general's powers during martial law. In 1878, Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids U.S. military involvement in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval.

Frequently asked questions