Martial Law: Can Governors Wield This Power?

In the United States, martial law refers to instances when a region, state, city, or the entire country is placed under the temporary control of a military body, with military commanders having unlimited authority to make and enforce laws. While the U.S. Constitution does not define or specify who can declare martial law, state governors have the power to impose it within their respective states, particularly when civilian authority has ceased to function due to insurrection, rebellion, or natural disaster. This power, however, is subject to limitations imposed by the Constitution, federal laws, and judicial review.

The US Constitution does not define martial law

The absence of an explicit provision in the Constitution regarding martial law does not preclude its existence as an emergency power. The nature of this power implies a permitted range of judgement and immediate decision-making to suppress violence and restore order. The power to declare martial law is not solely vested in the executive branch, and federal laws further regulate the domestic deployment of the military.

The interpretation of martial law as an emergency power is supported by historical precedents. For instance, during the West Virginia Coal Wars (1920-1921), martial law was declared in West Virginia at the behest of Governor Cornwell, who dispatched federal troops to deal with striking miners. Similarly, in Lexington, Kentucky, Francis C. Marshall imposed martial law to suppress a lynch mob attempting to storm the courthouse.

Despite the governor's ability to declare martial law, there are significant limits to their power. The US Constitution and federal laws constrain the conduct of states under a declaration of martial law, and judicial review is available in federal court. For example, civilians cannot be tried by military tribunals as long as civilian courts are functional.

In conclusion, while the US Constitution does not define martial law, its use throughout history has shaped its application and boundaries. The power to declare martial law rests with the president and state officials, but it is subject to limitations imposed by the Constitution, federal laws, and judicial review.

State governors have the power to impose martial law

Throughout history, state governors have exercised this power on numerous occasions. For example, during the West Virginia Coal Wars (1920-1921), Governor Cornwell declared martial law and dispatched federal troops to deal with striking miners. Similarly, Governor Ford of Illinois imposed martial law in Nauvoo during the Illinois Mormon War to protect the city from outside violence. In another instance, Governor James Peabody of Colorado declared martial law during a labour dispute between mine workers and their employers, leading to the arrest of striking workers.

The power of state governors to impose martial law is not without limitations. Federal courts can review the governor's decision and assess if the declaration was necessary. Additionally, the Constitution and federal laws still constrain the state's conduct, even under martial law. For instance, civilians cannot be tried by military tribunals as long as civilian courts are functional.

It is worth noting that the exact scope and limits of martial law remain unclear due to sparse and inconsistent Supreme Court precedents. The absence of specific legislation on martial law contributes to the ambiguity surrounding its implementation. Nonetheless, state governors have the authority to impose martial law within their respective states, and their decisions are given significant deference by the federal courts.

Martial law suspends all existing laws

In the United States, martial law may be declared by the President, Congress, or a State governor. However, such a formal proclamation is not necessary. Although the U.S. Constitution makes no specific provision for the imposition of martial law, nearly every State has a constitutional provision authorizing the government to impose it.

Martial law involves the temporary substitution of military authority for civilian rule. It is usually invoked in times of war, rebellion, or natural disaster, and gives the military commander of an area or country unlimited authority to make and enforce laws. This means that martial law suspends all existing laws, as well as civil authority and the ordinary administration of justice. The military commander's authority under martial law is virtually unlimited, although it is subject to some limitations. For example, civilians may not be tried by military tribunals as long as civilian courts are functional.

The suspension of existing laws under martial law can have significant implications for civil liberties and human rights. In the Philippines, for instance, martial law was imposed by President Ferdinand Marcos from 1972 to 1981, during which time the military committed human rights abuses, including the use of torture in intelligence gathering and forced disappearances. Similarly, in Egypt, martial law resulted in the suspension of the constitution and the military's authority to dissolve parliament.

While martial law can provide a necessary framework for restoring order and security in exceptional circumstances, it is essential to recognize that it represents a significant departure from the ordinary legal and governance framework. The suspension of existing laws under martial law underscores the concentration of power in the hands of military authorities, which can have both positive and negative consequences depending on the specific context.

Martial law has been declared nine times since World War II

In the United States, martial law refers to when a region, state, city, or the entire country is placed under the temporary control of a military body. This typically occurs when civilian authority has ceased to function, is completely absent, or has become ineffective. While the US Constitution does not make any specific provisions for the imposition of martial law, nearly every state has a constitutional provision authorizing the government to impose it. Notably, martial law has been declared nine times since World War II.

During World War II, the state of Hawaii was placed under martial law from 1941 to 1944 following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. This marked the beginning of three years of absolute military rule on the islands. In 1942, the army's Hawaii District was led by Ralph McT. Pennell, who coordinated the state's defenses and reported to the military governor.

In 1954, Alabama Governor Gordon Persons placed Russell County under martial law due to the pervasive influence of organized crime gangs. This was the last time that martial law was declared at the state level.

During the West Virginia Coal Wars of 1920-1921, martial law was declared in the state of West Virginia. Governor Cornwell requested federal troops to be dispatched to Mingo County to deal with the striking miners. An army officer was placed in charge, and he jailed union miners without any form of trial.

In 1919, local leaders declared martial law in Nauvoo, Illinois, during the Illinois Mormon War. This was done to protect themselves from mob violence after Joseph Smith, the founder of the Latter Day Saint movement, ordered the destruction of the Nauvoo Expositor, a paper published by a group of ex-Mormons that detailed Smith's alleged abuse of power. Smith was charged with causing a riot, and he responded by declaring martial law and calling on the Nauvoo Legion to protect the city from outside violence. Smith was eventually arrested for treason against the state of Illinois for declaring martial law and was murdered while awaiting trial.

In summary, martial law has been declared nine times since World War II, with five of those instances designed to counter resistance to federal desegregation decrees in the South. While the power to impose martial law rests with the governor, president, or Congress, it is subject to limitations and judicial review.

The Supreme Court has held that states can declare martial law

In the United States, martial law refers to instances when a region, state, city, or the entire country is placed under the control of a military body. It involves the temporary substitution of military authority for civilian rule and is usually invoked in times of war, rebellion, or natural disaster. While the U.S. Constitution does not explicitly provide for the imposition of martial law, nearly every state has a constitutional provision authorizing the government to impose it.

However, it is important to note that the Supreme Court has never explicitly held that the federal government or the President can impose martial law. While the President has significant authority to deploy troops to assist civilian law enforcement, the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits federal military forces from engaging in civilian law enforcement activities without express congressional authorization.

Throughout history, state governors have frequently declared martial law within their states. For example, during the West Virginia Coal Wars (1920-1921), Governor Cornwell requested federal troops to deal with striking miners, leading to a "veritable military dictatorship" in Mingo County. Similarly, in 1845, Nauvoo, Illinois, experienced civil unrest, and Joseph Smith, the leader of the Mormon community, declared martial law to protect the city from outside violence.

In summary, while the Supreme Court has affirmed states' authority to declare martial law, the exact scope and limitations of this power remain unclear due to sparse and inconsistent legal precedents. The absence of clear legislation and definitions related to martial law contributes to the ongoing uncertainty surrounding its implementation.

Frequently asked questions