Governors' Power: Can They Mandate Masks?

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought the issue of mask mandates to the forefront, with many states urging their residents to wear masks in public places to prevent the spread of the virus. However, this has also led to a legal furor, with some states' pre-existing anti-mask laws causing confusion. While some governors have used their emergency powers to suspend anti-mask laws or issue executive orders mandating masks, others have pushed for restrictions on mask-wearing in public. This has sparked debates about public safety, individual rights, and the role of the government in enforcing mask-wearing during a public health crisis.

Anti-mask laws vary by state

In Virginia, it is generally illegal to wear a mask in public, with the law prohibiting anyone over 16 from wearing a mask that conceals their identity. However, there are exceptions to this law, including for medical reasons and if the governor declares a public health emergency. In South Carolina, a similar law is in place, with exceptions for traditional holiday costumes, employment, theater productions, and gas masks for specific purposes. Louisiana and Minnesota have similar laws but make an exception for religious face coverings.

Some states, such as California, Michigan, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Florida, have laws that make it an offense to wear a mask with the intent to commit a crime or harass another person. Indiana's Governor Eric Holcomb faced opposition from within his own party when he announced a statewide mask mandate in 2020, with the state's Attorney General claiming he did not have the legal authority to do so.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul has pushed for a mask ban in state budget talks, citing public safety concerns. However, this has been met with criticism from those who argue that people should have the right to protest anonymously and that a person's intent for wearing a mask is not always apparent.

COVID-19 pandemic and the encouragement of wearing masks

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the encouragement of wearing masks by government officials and medical professionals has been a highly debated topic. While masks have been recommended by medical professionals to prevent the spread of the virus, there are pre-existing laws that prohibit the wearing of face coverings in public. These anti-mask laws were enacted to combat crimes such as those committed by the Ku Klux Klan, but they have also been applied to protests against racism or corruption. As a result, some governors have had to suspend the enforcement of these laws during the pandemic.

In 2020, the governor of Georgia, for instance, signed an executive order suspending the state's anti-mask law when masks were worn to comply with COVID-19 guidelines. Similarly, the governor of Alabama announced that the state would not enforce its anti-mask law during the pandemic. These suspensions aimed to encourage mask-wearing and prevent the spread of the virus.

However, the encouragement of mask-wearing during the pandemic has also faced opposition. In Indiana, Governor Eric Holcomb's order for Hoosiers to wear masks in public places sparked a legal furor. While some supported the mandate as a necessary protection against the spread of COVID-19, others, including Indiana's Republican Attorney General, condemned it. The Attorney General, Curtis Hill, claimed that Holcomb lacked the legal authority to issue a mask mandate and impose criminal penalties for non-compliance.

The debate over mask-wearing has also extended to discussions about public safety and the right to protest anonymously. Governor Kathy Hochul of New York has pushed for restrictions on public masking, expressing concern over the use of masks by criminals and protestors. Critics, such as the New York Civil Liberties Union, argue that people should have the right to protest anonymously, and that a person's intent in wearing a mask is not always apparent.

Overall, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought the issue of mask-wearing to the forefront, with conflicting perspectives on the encouragement of mask-wearing due to the complex interplay between public health, safety, and individual rights. While some governors have mandated masks to prevent the spread of the virus, others have faced legal and political challenges, highlighting the ongoing debate surrounding this topic.

The legality of a governor's order to wear masks

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought to light the legality of governors' orders to wear masks, with many states urging citizens to wear face coverings to curb the spread of the virus. While medical professionals highly recommend wearing masks to protect oneself from the coronavirus, some states' anti-mask laws have caused confusion.

In 2020, Alabama's Attorney General, for instance, had to publicly announce that the state would not enforce its anti-mask law during the pandemic. The Governor of Georgia also had to sign an executive order temporarily suspending the enforcement of the mask law if the mask was being worn to comply with COVID-19 guidelines.

In Indiana, a legal furor arose following Governor Eric Holcomb's order for all Hoosiers to wear a face covering in public places when social distancing was not possible. Attorney General Curtis Hill claimed that Holcomb did not have the legal authority to issue a mask mandate and impose criminal penalties for those who refused to comply. However, Democratic candidate for attorney general, Jonathan Weinzapfel, supported the mandate, stating that taking reasonable protections to minimize the spread of COVID-19 was essential.

In Virginia, while the law generally criminalizes the wearing of masks in public, there are exceptions. It is not illegal to wear a mask for legitimate medical reasons, including protecting oneself and others from COVID-19. Additionally, during a declared state of emergency by the Governor, an express waiver can be made to allow for the wearing of masks.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul has also pushed for restrictions on public masking, citing public safety concerns. However, critics argue that such restrictions could endanger public health and lead to discriminatory enforcement. The issue of mask mandates has sparked debate within her own party, with some legislators opposing any limitations on public masking.

Exceptions to anti-mask laws

Anti-mask laws, which prohibit the wearing of face coverings in public places, vary from state to state in the United States. While some states have blanket bans on wearing any mask in public, others only prohibit masks if worn with the intent to commit a crime, harass or intimidate another person, or deprive someone of their constitutional rights. However, there are exceptions to these anti-mask laws.

For instance, in South Carolina, Georgia, North Carolina, and West Virginia, exceptions are made for traditional holiday costumes, employment-related reasons, theater productions, and gas masks for specific purposes. Louisiana and Minnesota also include religious face coverings in their exceptions, while Virginia allows for medical reasons and emergency exemptions declared by the governor. During the COVID-19 pandemic, states with anti-mask laws chose not to enforce them to encourage the use of face coverings to prevent the spread of the virus.

Additionally, some laws that ban masks in public places have exemptions for Mardi Gras and similar events, Halloween, performances, religious coverings, helmets, and medical purposes. These exemptions generally do not apply to sex offenders. There are also laws that make it illegal to wear a mask with the intent to obstruct law enforcement or intimidate or hinder an officer in the performance of their duties, but these often do not specifically mention masks and focus more on the intent to disrupt law enforcement.

The application of anti-mask laws has been a subject of debate, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic and in the context of protests. Some states have selectively enforced these laws against student protestors, while others have urged authorities to disregard the laws during the pandemic. The debate surrounding anti-mask laws pits civil rights and health concerns against concerns about crime and the identification of protestors.

The history of anti-mask laws

In the United States, the first anti-mask law was passed in 1845 in New York. This law was enacted to suppress an insurgency by tenant farmers in the Hudson Valley, who were essentially enslaved and revolting against their landlords. The law criminalized the wearing of masks or disguises, and it remained in place for 175 years, even being used to suppress and arrest queer individuals and peaceful protesters. It wasn't until the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 that the law was repealed to mandate the wearing of masks in public for health reasons.

Other states in the US have their own anti-mask laws, which vary in their specifics. Some states, such as South Carolina, Georgia, North Carolina, and West Virginia, have laws that prohibit individuals over 16 from wearing masks that conceal their identities in public, except for specific purposes like traditional holiday costumes or employment. Louisiana and Minnesota have laws that make exceptions for religious face coverings, while Virginia allows for medical reasons and emergency exemptions. Some states, including California, Michigan, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Florida, make it an offense to wear a mask with the intent to commit a crime or harass another person.

The debate around anti-mask laws has evolved with the COVID-19 pandemic, as public health recommendations encouraged the wearing of masks to prevent the spread of the virus. This led to confusion and, in some cases, the suspension of anti-mask law enforcement to prioritize health and safety. Additionally, there have been calls to reinstate or modify anti-mask laws to address masked harassment and intimidation, particularly by hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan, without infringing on the right to peaceful protest.

Frequently asked questions