Challenging Laws: Supreme Court's Role

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States and plays a crucial role in the country's constitutional system of government. It has the power of judicial review, which allows it to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution. This power was established in the case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. The Supreme Court's decisions have a profound impact on society, and it serves as the court of last resort for those seeking justice. While the Supreme Court can be petitioned to review a case, it is not obligated to do so unless specific circumstances are met. The Court typically agrees to hear a case when it involves significant legal principles or when multiple federal appellate courts have interpreted a law differently.

Supreme Court's jurisdiction

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and its decisions have a profound impact on society. The Supreme Court's jurisdiction, or legal ability to hear a case, is established by Article III, Section II of the US Constitution. The Court has original jurisdiction over certain cases, which means the cases are tried before the Court, and appellate jurisdiction over almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law.

The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over cases that involve suits between two or more states, cases involving ambassadors, other public ministers, and consuls, and those in which the US is a party. This means that these cases can be filed directly with the Supreme Court rather than reaching the Court on appeal from another court. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to hear a case on appeal. The Court usually hears cases that have been decided in a US Court of Appeals or the highest Court in a given state.

The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction over cases that involve a point of constitutional or federal law. This includes cases involving treaties, cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases), and cases where the Court interprets a law differently from federal appellate courts. The Supreme Court's appellate jurisdiction is not self-executing, meaning that Congress must enact legislation to empower the Court to hear cases on appeal. The Court typically agrees to hear a case only when it involves an unusually important legal principle or when there are conflicting interpretations of a law by multiple federal appellate courts.

The Supreme Court's best-known power is judicial review, or the ability to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution. This power was established in the case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, where the Court held that an Act of Congress contrary to the Constitution could not stand. The Supreme Court also has the authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution. This authority was established after the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1869, which expanded the provisions of the Bill of Rights to the states.

The Supreme Court consists of nine Justices, including one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices. The Justices are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate, and they typically hold office for life. Four of the nine Justices must vote to accept a case, and five must vote to grant a stay of execution. The Supreme Court's term typically begins on the first Monday in October and goes until the Sunday before the first Monday in October of the following year.

Supreme Court's authority to strike down state laws

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and it plays a pivotal role in the country's legal system. The Court's power to strike down state laws is derived from its authority to conduct judicial review, which was established in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. In this case, the Supreme Court held that an Act of Congress that contradicts the Constitution could not stand, and it established the precedent that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

The Supreme Court's authority to strike down state laws is based on its power of judicial review, which allows it to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution. This power is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but was established through judicial precedent. The Court has original jurisdiction over certain cases, such as disputes between two or more states or cases involving ambassadors, and it has appellate jurisdiction over almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional or federal law. When a litigant is not satisfied with a decision made by a lower court, they may file a petition for a "writ of certiorari," requesting the Supreme Court to review the case. The Supreme Court is not obligated to grant review and typically does so only when the case involves an important legal principle or conflicting interpretations of a law by different appellate courts.

The Supreme Court's ability to strike down state laws is essential for several reasons. Firstly, it ensures that each branch of the government recognises and abides by the limits of its power, as outlined in the Constitution. Secondly, it protects the rights and liberties of citizens by striking down laws that violate the Constitution and safeguarding the rights protected by it. This is especially important for minority populations, as it prevents majorities from passing laws that could infringe upon the rights of less popular groups.

The Supreme Court has used its authority to strike down state laws in several landmark cases. For example, in Brown v. Board of Education (1954), the Court struck down state laws that established racial segregation in public schools, affirming the principle of equality under the law. In another case, Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District (1969), the Court held that students could not be punished for wearing black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War, recognising that students do not give up their rights when they enter the schoolhouse gates. These cases demonstrate the Supreme Court's power to interpret the Constitution and safeguard the rights and liberties of Americans.

Supreme Court's ability to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and it plays a crucial role in the constitutional system of government. The Court's power of judicial review is its most well-known authority, allowing it to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution. This power, however, is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution itself. The Supreme Court established this doctrine in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, where the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution took precedence as the supreme law of the land.

The Judiciary Act of 1789 granted the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus, which are legal orders compelling government officials to act according to the law. In the Marbury v. Madison case, the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not authorise it to have original jurisdiction in this matter. As Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the supreme law, the Court held that an Act of Congress contrary to the Constitution could not stand.

The Supreme Court's ability to strike down state laws that violate the Constitution was also established in subsequent cases. The passage of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1869 extended the Bill of Rights, which initially only applied to the federal government, to the states as well. This means that the Supreme Court has the final say on whether a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right has been violated.

The Supreme Court's decisions have a significant impact on society, influencing not just lawyers and judges but also the general public. The Court's rulings ensure that each branch of government recognises its own limitations and protects civil rights and liberties. It also sets limits on democratic governments, preventing the majority from passing laws that harm or take advantage of minorities.

The Supreme Court's jurisdiction, or legal ability to hear a case, is established by Article III, Section II of the Constitution. The Court has original jurisdiction over specific cases, such as suits between two or more states or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. It also has appellate jurisdiction, allowing it to hear cases on appeal that involve constitutional or federal law. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether to hear a case.

Supreme Court's role in ensuring each branch of government recognises its power limits

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States and is the court of last resort for those seeking justice. The Supreme Court plays a crucial role in the constitutional system of government. Its power of judicial review is essential in ensuring that each branch of government recognises and respects the limits of its own power.

The Supreme Court's ability to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. However, this power was established in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. In this case, the Court decided that an Act of Congress contrary to the Constitution could not stand, as the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. This power of judicial review allows the Court to act as a check on the legislative and executive branches, ensuring that they do not exceed their authority.

The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over certain cases, such as suits between two or more states, cases involving ambassadors, and other public ministers. It also has appellate jurisdiction over almost any other case involving constitutional or federal law. When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court has the discretion to decide whether or not to hear a case, and it typically agrees to do so only when the case involves an important legal principle or when lower courts have interpreted the law differently.

The Supreme Court's decisions have a significant impact on society, influencing not just lawyers and judges but also the general public. For example, in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District (1969), the Court held that students could not be punished for wearing black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War, protecting their freedom of speech.

While the Supreme Court possesses vast power, it is not without checks and balances. The President nominates Supreme Court justices, and the Senate confirms these nominations. Additionally, Congress can impeach and remove judges from office. The number of seats on the Supreme Court has been fixed at nine since shortly after the Civil War, and any changes to this number would require political will and the President's consent.

Supreme Court's ability to hear cases involving two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and it has the power to hear cases involving two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors. This power is established by Article III, Section II of the US Constitution, which outlines the Court's jurisdiction, or legal ability to hear a case.

The Supreme Court's original jurisdiction, where a case is tried before the Court for the first time, includes suits between two or more states, as well as cases involving ambassadors, other public ministers, and consuls. This is because individual states do not have jurisdiction over one another, and so the Supreme Court is tasked with handling disputes between state governments. The Court's original jurisdiction over cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers is also explicitly stated in Article III, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court has addressed several legal questions related to its original jurisdiction over cases involving ambassadors. One question is whether the Court has original jurisdiction when an ambassador has only an indirect interest in the outcome of a proceeding. In United States v. Ortega, the Court ruled that prosecuting someone for violating international law and US law by offering violence to a foreign minister was a public prosecution and not a suit affecting the minister. Another question is whether the Court can determine the official status of a person claiming to be an ambassador. In re Baiz (1890), the Court refused to review the Executive Branch's decision regarding the public character of a person claiming to be a public minister, instead accepting a certificate from the Department of State.

The Supreme Court's ability to hear cases involving two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors is an important aspect of its role in the US constitutional system of government. The Court's decisions in these cases can have a significant impact on society, shaping the interpretation and application of the Constitution and influencing the resolution of disputes between states.

Frequently asked questions