Executive Orders: Can They Repeal Laws?

Executive orders are written directives issued by the president, which are often used to implement policy outside the regular law-making process. They are not defined in the Constitution and rely on historical practice, executive interpretations, and court decisions for their authority. While they can be powerful tools for presidents to advance their agendas, they are not as durable as laws or regulations and can be undone by the courts, the next president, or Congress. This raises the question: can a law be repealed by executive order?

Executive orders are not as durable as laws or regulations

Executive orders are written directives issued by the president, which have the power to shape policy outside of the regular law-making process. They are often used to advance the president's agenda and direct rulemaking, the process of translating laws into codified policy. However, executive orders are not as durable as laws or regulations. They can be challenged and overturned by the courts if found to be unconstitutional or in violation of existing statutes.

The power to issue executive orders stems from the Constitution and powers granted to the president by Congress. While the Constitution grants the president broad powers in areas such as control of the federal government and federal agencies, it is not a unilateral power. The president's authority to issue executive orders is limited by the constraints set by Congress and the courts.

Congress can deter presidents from issuing executive orders on certain issues by withholding the legal authority to make policy in those areas. If the president issues an order despite this, the courts can step in and overturn it. Additionally, Congress can impose sanctions on a president for issuing an executive order they disagree with, such as sabotaging legislative agendas or defunding programs.

Furthermore, executive orders can be undone by the next president, who can simply revoke them with a new executive order. This highlights the temporary nature of executive orders, which are subject to change with each administration.

In conclusion, while executive orders can be a powerful tool for presidents to implement their policies, they are not as durable as laws or regulations. They are subject to legal, congressional, and political constraints that can limit their effectiveness and longevity.

The US President's power to issue executive orders stems from the Constitution and Congress

The US President's power to issue executive orders is derived from the Constitution and Congress. Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution, which vests executive powers in the president, states that the president "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed". The president is also designated as the "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States" in Article II, Section 2, and is generally understood to have broad powers in areas such as control and operation of the federal government, federal agencies, and foreign affairs.

While an executive order can have the same effect as a federal law under certain circumstances, it must be rooted in one of the president's powers as outlined in the Constitution or in a law passed by Congress. The authority of executive orders is not final, and federal courts can be called on to review an order's lawfulness and determine whether it is a valid exercise of the president's power. No president can issue an order that contradicts or violates the Constitution, federal laws, or Americans' fundamental rights.

Congress can also grant additional powers to the president by statute, and in some cases, the courts have upheld executive orders and proclamations when it is determined that the president had been granted some powers by Congress to issue a directive. For example, in Trump v. Hawaii (2018), the Supreme Court upheld an executive proclamation blocking the entry of certain foreign nationals into the United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The court found the proclamation was consistent with "the broad statutory text [of the INA] and the deference traditionally accorded to the President in this sphere".

Additionally, presidents have the power to modify or revoke not only an executive order issued during their term but also orders issued by past presidents that have not been revoked, as executive orders generally do not have expiration dates. However, Congress can pass a new law to override an executive order, but only for those orders enacted "pursuant to powers delegated to the President" by Congress. Conversely, Congress cannot directly modify or revoke an executive order that was issued pursuant to powers granted exclusively to the president by the Constitution.

Executive orders can be undone by the courts

Executive orders are presidential written directives to agencies on how to implement the law. They allow presidents to make policies outside of the regular law-making process. However, executive orders can be undone by the courts if they are found to be unlawful or unconstitutional.

The federal judiciary has reviewed the constitutionality of legislation enacted by Congress since the early days of the republic. The Court's decision in Marbury v. Madison (1803) confirmed that federal courts have the authority to review the actions of the executive branch. This review frequently concerns the actions of administrative agencies and executive orders. Federal court review of executive orders helps to define the scope of presidential powers and serves as a check and balance on the president's powers.

A president's authority to issue an executive order typically comes from a congressional statute or their constitutional power to execute the nation's laws. If an executive order is based on inherent presidential powers not authorized by Congress, it may raise separation-of-powers concerns, and courts must determine whether the president has exercised legislative power belonging only to Congress. Courts can strike down executive orders if they find that the president lacked the authority to issue them or if the order is unconstitutional.

Executive orders can also be challenged on specific statutory and constitutional grounds or subjected to "reasonableness review," where courts review statutes and executive actions to ensure they are reasonable and do not limit rights to life, liberty, or property. While critics argue that this practice is undemocratic, it helps safeguard civil liberties and civil rights by ensuring that executive orders do not cause harm.

Congress can deter the President from issuing executive orders by withholding legal authority

Executive orders are issued by the President of the United States, acting in their capacity as head of the executive branch. They direct a federal official or administrative agency to engage in a course of action or refrain from a course of action. While executive orders cannot override federal laws and statutes, they can be used to implement a statute. For example, Congress can declare a certain drug illegal, but with an executive order, the President can tell the Department of Justice whether prosecuting certain drug cases is a priority.

The Constitution has a set of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch of the government is more powerful than the others. The President cannot use an executive order to sidestep these checks and balances, and they cannot take over powers from other branches, such as the power vested in Congress to pass new statutes or in the courts to invalidate certain laws as unconstitutional.

Additionally, Congress can enact a law that reverses what the President has done, provided that Congress has the constitutional authority to legislate on the issue. A court can also hold that an executive order is unlawful if it violates the Constitution or a federal statute. Any future President can also issue a new executive order that rescinds or amends a previous one.

Executive orders can be used to advance the President's agenda

Executive orders are a powerful tool for US presidents to advance their agenda and effect significant change without requiring approval from Congress. They are directives issued by the President that carry the force of federal law and are a common feature of the modern US government. Every American president since George Washington has used executive orders, with some landmark moments in US history being a direct result of their use.

Executive orders can be used by the President to direct federal agencies and departments to take specific actions or implement policies that align with their agenda. For example, one of President Trump's first executive orders was aimed at weakening Obamacare, allowing federal agencies to "take all actions consistent with the law to minimise the unwarranted economic and regulatory burdens of the [Affordable Care] Act". Similarly, President Lincoln used executive orders to suspend the writ of habeas corpus during the Civil War, and President Roosevelt established internment camps during World War II through an executive order.

The process of issuing an executive order typically begins with an introduction that legitimises the order and outlines the President's legal rationale for issuing it. This introduction often invokes the authority vested in the President by the Constitution and laws of the United States. The order is then directed to officials or personnel in the executive branch or federal agencies, who are expected to carry out the directives.

Executive orders can be controversial, as they do not require congressional approval and can have a significant impact on the country. They can be overturned by a sitting US President issuing another executive order or through congressional action, such as passing new legislation that conflicts with the order or removing funding for its implementation.

While executive orders cannot directly repeal laws, they can be used to advance a President's agenda by directing federal agencies to interpret and enforce existing laws in a specific way or by issuing directives that align with the President's policy goals. This allows presidents to use executive orders to shape the implementation and enforcement of laws, thereby advancing their agenda without explicitly repealing any legislation.

Frequently asked questions