Law Firm Self-Representation: Ethical Or Not?

The ability of a law firm to represent itself is a complex issue. Generally, companies need to be represented by an attorney, even though they are considered persons under the law. However, there are exceptions, such as sole proprietorships, where the owner is the company and can represent themselves. In the case of a law firm, the situation may be different. While there is no explicit prohibition against a lawyer representing their own firm, ethical considerations and potential conflicts of interest may arise. For example, a lawyer cannot represent both an LLC and its individual members in a shareholder dispute. Additionally, a lawyer representing themselves may face challenges in court, as seen in the case of Brooks v. S.C. Commission on Indigent Defense, where a lawyer's request to represent himself was initially denied.

Can a lawyer represent themselves and their LLC?

In general, companies need to be represented by an attorney in court. Even though a company is a "person" under the law, it is still a person created by the corporation laws of the state where it is incorporated. Therefore, a lawyer cannot represent both an LLC and its individual members in a shareholder dispute.

In the context of closely held corporations or LLCs, lawyers with a history of representing the company must be careful about conflicts of interest. They must not take a legal position against a member of an LLC where they have historically represented that LLC and answered to that client. There are ethical minefields for a law firm that represents a company at the same time as another member.

There are, however, some exceptions. In the case of small claims courts, companies may defend themselves through their directors or officers without an attorney. For example, in New York, corporations may defend themselves in small claims court without an attorney. Additionally, if a business owner is sued in their individual capacity, they may represent themselves.

If you are a lawyer and a 100% owner of an LLC, you may be able to dissolve the LLC and switch to a sole proprietorship to represent your business. However, this may cause problems, such as personal liability if the LLC is the defendant or issues with standing to make a claim if the LLC is the plaintiff.

Can a lawyer be a witness and represent themselves?

Combining the roles of advocate and witness can prejudice the tribunal and the opposing party and can also involve a conflict of interest between the lawyer and client. A witness is required to testify on the basis of personal knowledge, while an advocate is expected to explain and comment on evidence given by others. It may not be clear whether a statement by an advocate-witness should be taken as proof or as an analysis of the proof. This is sometimes called the 'advocate-witness rule'.

If a lawyer is a potential witness to the events of a case, they would likely need to avoid taking on the case for that reason. A lawyer cannot be a witness in their own case. If a lawyer is present when a suspect commits a crime, they cannot defend the suspect in court. This is because the lawyer is now a potential witness to the crime. If the lawyer is already representing the defendant, they would have to withdraw and declare a mistrial.

However, there are some exceptions to this rule. For example, if the testimony will be uncontested, the ambiguities in the dual role are purely theoretical. Or, if the testimony concerns the extent and value of legal services rendered in the action in which the testimony is offered, permitting the lawyers to testify avoids the need for a second trial with new counsel to resolve that issue. In such a situation, the judge has firsthand knowledge of the matter in issue; hence, there is less dependence on the adversary process to test the credibility of the testimony.

Additionally, a lawyer may be able to represent themselves in a trial where they are also a witness, under the regular rules for pro se representation. However, this is generally not advised, as there is a well-known adage that says, "the attorney who chooses to represent themself has a fool for a client".

Can a law firm represent itself if it's a sole proprietorship?

A sole proprietorship is a business structure where the business is owned and controlled by one person, and that person is liable for any of the business's obligations. This structure offers advantages such as low cost, simplified taxes, and control for the owner. However, it also comes with challenges, including unlimited liability and the requirement to pay self-employment taxes.

In the context of a law firm, a sole proprietorship means that there is no legal distinction between the owner, who is a legal professional, and the business entity. This structure provides unparalleled autonomy and control to the sole proprietor, allowing for swift responses to client needs and market changes without the bureaucracy seen in larger firms. All profits generated by the firm belong solely to the proprietor, and administrative tasks can be streamlined.

Regarding self-representation in court, the general rule is that companies, including law firms, need to be represented by an attorney. This is because, despite being considered a "person" under the law, a company is ultimately a legal construct created by the corporation laws of the state where it is incorporated. Allowing a non-attorney employee to represent the company would constitute the unauthorized practice of law.

However, there is an exception for sole proprietorships. If your law firm is a sole proprietorship, you can represent yourself and your company in court because you and your business are legally considered one and the same. This is because you have likely not filed with your state and incorporated as a separate legal entity. For example, in New York, sole proprietorships are not required by law to hire an attorney for legal proceedings, while corporations and partnerships typically are.

It is important to note that there may be exceptions and variations depending on the specific state laws and regulations. Therefore, it is always advisable to consult with an experienced attorney to explore your options and ensure compliance with the applicable laws and ethical rules.

Can a law firm represent itself if its owner is a licensed attorney?

Generally, companies need to be represented by an attorney. While a company has the power to file a lawsuit or defend itself, it cannot represent itself in court but must be represented by a licensed attorney. This rule applies to corporations, limited liability companies (LLCs), partnerships, and limited partnerships.

However, there are some exceptions to this rule. One exception is if the company is a sole proprietorship. In this case, the owner is the company, and they can represent themselves and the company. Another exception is if the owner of the company is also a licensed attorney in the court where the company needs legal representation. In this case, the company is not barred from engaging its owner as an attorney to represent it.

There are, however, ethical considerations and potential conflicts of interest to be aware of when a law firm represents itself or its employees. Many law firms have rules or policies prohibiting their lawyers from representing other firm personnel because it could create disharmony and conflict within the firm. Additionally, lawyers must be careful not to take a legal position against a member of an LLC where they have historically represented that LLC.

In summary, while it may be possible for a law firm to represent itself if its owner is a licensed attorney, there are ethical and practical considerations to take into account, and it may be advisable to seek independent legal counsel to avoid any potential conflicts of interest.

Can a law firm represent itself in a shareholder dispute?

Shareholder disputes are common, and they can be complex and sensitive. Disputes may arise between shareholders and companies, or among owners of closely held businesses. These disputes can involve alleged breaches of fiduciary duty, disputes over executive compensation, shareholder appraisal rights, minority shareholder rights, or conflicts over the future direction of the business. In almost every instance, emotions run high, and the future of the business is at stake.

When it comes to legal representation in shareholder disputes, it is generally not advisable for a law firm to represent itself. In the case of closely held corporations or LLCs, lawyers must be cautious about conflicts of interest. They should not take a legal position against a member of an LLC that they have historically represented. Similarly, a lawyer cannot represent both the LLC and individual members in a shareholder dispute, especially if there is a history of representing the LLC and its members. This is because the lawyer may possess confidential information about the LLC that could create a conflict of interest if they were to now represent one or more of its members in a dispute.

However, there may be certain situations where a law firm could represent itself in a shareholder dispute. If the law firm has not previously represented the corporation and does not have any confidential information about the corporation that is material to the dispute, it may be possible for them to represent themselves. Additionally, if the law firm obtains informed written consent from both the corporation and the individual members involved in the dispute, they may be able to provide legal representation while being mindful of potential conflicts of interest.

In any case, it is always recommended to seek independent legal advice when facing a shareholder dispute. An experienced attorney who specializes in shareholder litigation can provide knowledgeable legal representation and guide you through the complex legal challenges that may arise. They can help protect your rights and interests, whether you are a majority or minority shareholder, and work with you to devise the best strategy to achieve your goals.

Frequently asked questions