The Law, Scotus, And Overturning: Who Has The Final Say?

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States and plays a crucial role in the country's constitutional system of government. It has the power to review and strike down laws that violate the Constitution, ensuring that the government recognizes its limits and protecting civil rights and liberties. The Court has original jurisdiction over cases between states, those involving ambassadors, and certain other cases, while it has appellate jurisdiction over almost all other cases involving constitutional or federal law. Notably, the Supreme Court's rulings can be overturned or questioned in subsequent cases, as demonstrated in United States v. Darby (1941), which challenged the earlier ruling in Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918), and Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), which overturned the earlier ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896).

Can a law void a SCOTUS ruling?

The Supreme Court's role in the US government

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and it plays a crucial role in the country's constitutional system of government. The Court's role is multi-faceted and has a significant impact on society at large. Firstly, as the highest court in the land, it is the final arbiter for those seeking justice, hearing cases that have been appealed from lower courts.

The Supreme Court's jurisdiction is established by Article III, Section II of the Constitution. It has original jurisdiction in specific cases, such as suits between states or cases involving ambassadors. In most other cases, the Court has appellate jurisdiction, allowing it to hear cases on appeal that involve constitutional or federal law. The Certiorari Act of 1925 grants the Court the discretion to decide whether to hear a case on appeal.

Secondly, the Supreme Court possesses the power of judicial review, which is a crucial check on the other branches of government. This power enables the Court to interpret the Constitution and determine the scope and nature of the powers of the legislative and executive branches. By doing so, the Court ensures that each branch of government respects the limits of its authority. The Court's decisions can have far-reaching consequences, such as in Goldwater v. Carter (1979), where the Court's ruling effectively gave the President the power to terminate ratified treaties without Congressional approval.

Thirdly, the Supreme Court plays a vital role in protecting civil rights and liberties. The Court can strike down laws that violate the Constitution, thereby safeguarding the rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights. This power extends to state and local laws, ensuring that they do not infringe on Constitutional rights. For example, in Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District (1969), the Court upheld the right of students to freedom of expression, ruling that they do not "shed their rights at the schoolhouse gate."

Lastly, the Supreme Court acts as a check on the democratic process by preventing the majority from passing laws that harm or take undue advantage of minorities. This role ensures that the changing views of the majority do not undermine fundamental American values, such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

The Supreme Court's jurisdiction

The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section II of the US Constitution. The Court has original jurisdiction over certain cases, such as suits between states, cases involving ambassadors, and other public ministers. It also has appellate jurisdiction, allowing it to hear appeals on almost any case involving constitutional or federal law. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether to hear a case when exercising its appellate jurisdiction.

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the US and plays a crucial role in the constitutional system of government. Its decisions can shape society and have long-lasting impacts. One of the essential roles of the Court is to ensure that each branch of the government recognizes its power limits. It does this through its power of judicial review, which allows it to strike down laws that violate the Constitution.

The Court has the authority to review and overturn its previous rulings. For example, in United States v. Darby (1941), the Court questioned the rationale of its earlier decision in Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918). Similarly, in Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Court reversed its earlier position in Betts v. Snyder (1942) regarding the right to counsel for indigent defendants.

Additionally, the Supreme Court can overturn its own precedents and strike down state laws found to be unconstitutional. This power was established in the Judiciary Act of 1789, which gave the Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus, or legal orders compelling government officials to act according to the law. The Court has used this power to protect civil rights and liberties and set limits on democratic government, ensuring that majorities cannot pass laws that harm minorities.

The Supreme Court's power to strike down laws violating the Constitution

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and it plays a crucial role in the country's constitutional system of government. Its power to strike down laws that violate the Constitution is derived from the principle of judicial review, which was established in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. This power allows the Court to ensure that all branches of the government respect the limits of their authority and protect the rights and liberties of American citizens.

Article III, Section II of the Constitution outlines the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, granting it original jurisdiction in specific cases, such as suits between states or cases involving ambassadors. The Court also has appellate jurisdiction, allowing it to hear appeals on almost any case involving constitutional or federal law. This includes cases where the United States is a party, cases involving treaties, and admiralty cases.

The Supreme Court's authority to strike down laws that violate the Constitution extends to federal, state, and local legislative and executive actions. This power was first established in the case of Marbury v. Madison, where the Court refused to issue a writ of mandamus (a legal order compelling a government official to act) because it violated Article III of the Constitution. Chief Justice John Marshall's interpretation of the Supremacy Clause affirmed that Congress could not use its legislative power to alter the Constitution.

The Supreme Court has used its power of judicial review to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution. This authority was established in subsequent cases following the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1869, which expanded the application of the Bill of Rights to the states. The Court's decisions in these cases reaffirmed that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any conflicting laws or acts, including those passed by Congress, cannot stand.

The Supreme Court's role in striking down unconstitutional laws is essential for maintaining the balance of power between the branches of government and protecting the rights of minorities. By ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that infringe on the rights of unpopular minorities, the Court safeguards fundamental American values and freedoms, such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law. The Court's decisions have had a profound impact on society, influencing not just legal professionals but also individuals from all walks of life, including students.

The Supreme Court's ability to hear a case on appeal

Article III, Section II of the US Constitution establishes the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction over certain cases, such as suits between two or more states, cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases). In these instances, the Supreme Court may be the first court to hear a case.

However, the Supreme Court is generally limited to hearing appeals from other courts. It has appellate jurisdiction over almost any case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. The Supreme Court will review a case decided by a US Circuit Court of Appeals or the highest court in a state if it hinges on questions of federal law. The Supreme Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case when exercising its appellate jurisdiction. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so.

A litigant who loses in a federal court of appeals or the highest court of a state may file a petition for a "writ of certiorari", which is a document asking the Supreme Court to review the case. The Supreme Court does not have to grant this review. The Court typically agrees to hear a case only when it involves an unusually important legal principle, or when two or more federal appellate courts have interpreted a law differently. There are also special circumstances in which the Supreme Court is required by law to hear an appeal.

The Supreme Court's power of judicial review means it can declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution. This power is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but was established in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803). The Supreme Court also has the authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court's impact on society

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and its decisions have a profound impact on society. The Court's rulings shape the country's laws and policies, influencing the lives of all Americans. One of the Court's essential roles is to interpret the Constitution and ensure that the government's actions are in line with it. This power of judicial review allows the Court to strike down laws or government actions that violate the Constitution, protecting the rights and liberties of citizens. For instance, in Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), the Court ruled that the constitutional guarantee of a fair trial includes the right to counsel for defendants who cannot afford their own lawyers.

The Supreme Court also resolves disputes between states or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers, ensuring harmonious interstate relations and effective governance. Its rulings in these cases can shape how states interact and exercise their powers. For example, in Hammer v. Dagenhart (1918), the Court ruled in favour of a North Carolina business owner who sued the government over a federal law prohibiting the interstate shipment of goods produced by child labour. This ruling protected the state's right to set its own child labour laws.

Additionally, the Supreme Court plays a pivotal role in safeguarding civil rights and liberties. Its interpretations of the Constitution's protections have had a profound impact on minority groups and individuals' freedoms. A notable example is Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), where the Court unanimously ruled that the segregationist doctrine of "separate but equal" violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. This decision overturned the previous ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and marked a turning point in the fight against segregation in American public schools.

The Court's rulings also extend to protecting the rights of marginalized communities. In Lawrence v. Texas (2003), the Court ruled that gay and lesbian individuals' right to liberty under the Due Process Clause allowed them to engage in private conduct without government intervention. This decision invalidated Texas's anti-sodomy law and advanced gay rights nationwide.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court's decisions have far-reaching consequences for American society. Its interpretations of the Constitution and laws shape public policy, protect civil liberties, and ensure that government actions are in check. The Court's rulings can overturn previous decisions, adapt to changing social values, and address contemporary issues, making it a dynamic and influential force in the nation's legal and social landscape.

Frequently asked questions