Lawyer's Dual Firm Work: Ethical Or Not?

It is not uncommon for lawyers to find themselves representing clients at more than one law firm at the same time. This could be due to a lawyer having the status of of counsel at another firm or a partner volunteering at a community legal services office. However, this situation raises ethical questions, such as potential conflicts of interest and breaches of confidentiality. While it may be challenging to navigate the ethical implications, it is important to note that each law firm has its own policies, and smaller firms may be more accommodating to individual circumstances.

Conflict of interest

It is not uncommon for lawyers to work with two law firms simultaneously. However, this arrangement can potentially lead to conflicts of interest, which can have serious consequences for both the lawyer and the client.

A conflict of interest arises when a lawyer's interests are placed ahead of the client's. This can occur when a lawyer has financial or business interests related to the case they are handling, such as referring a client to a business in which the lawyer has a financial stake. It can also occur when a lawyer has relationships with other parties involved in the case, such as being a beneficiary of a will or having an intimate relationship with a client.

To avoid conflicts of interest, law firms should have comprehensive systems in place to check for potential conflicts. Lawyers also have a duty of loyalty to their clients, which means they should not abandon a client to take on a more lucrative opportunity, nor should they represent multiple clients with opposing interests in the same case.

If a conflict of interest arises, it should be addressed promptly. Lawyers can seek help from other lawyers within or outside the firm, or from resources such as Lawyeringlaw.com, which offers a legal ethics "hotline" consultation. Failing to address conflicts of interest can result in disciplinary proceedings, suspension of a law license, disqualification, or even legal malpractice suits.

Confidentiality and fiduciary duties

Lawyers have a fiduciary duty to their clients. This means that they have a legal and ethical obligation to act in their clients' best interests. This fiduciary relationship includes several duties, such as the duty of care, loyalty, good faith, prudence, and disclosure, in addition to confidentiality. Confidentiality is a key aspect of the fiduciary duties of lawyers, requiring them to maintain the confidentiality of all information relating to their clients. They must not use any information, whether written or spoken, for personal gain and must disclose all relevant information that could impact their ability to act in their clients' best interests.

For example, a lawyer must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may arise when working with multiple firms or clients. They must ensure that their duties to one firm or client do not compromise their ability to maintain confidentiality and act in the best interests of another. This could include situations where a lawyer has access to sensitive information from one firm that could be detrimental to another firm or client if disclosed.

In the case of "Banks v. Mario Industries of Virginia, Inc.", a lighting manufacturer sued a former employee for establishing a competing business, alleging that the employee used proprietary information from their previous employment. While the manufacturer did not require employees to sign a non-compete or confidentiality clause, the court ruled that the employee owed the company a fiduciary duty of loyalty, resulting in a breach of duty and a significant penalty.

To avoid breaches of fiduciary duty, lawyers must exercise caution and critical awareness of risks. They should disclose any potential conflicts and ensure that their actions are forthright and in the best interests of their clients at all times. By upholding their fiduciary duties, lawyers maintain the integrity of their profession and protect the interests of those they represent.

Ethical implications

One of the fundamental ethical duties of lawyers is to maintain client confidentiality and avoid any breaches of fiduciary responsibilities. When a lawyer works for two firms, there is an increased risk of inadvertently sharing client information across firms, even if unintentionally. This could occur through the simple act of checking conflicts or attempting to set up effective screens when a potential conflict arises. In such cases, the lawyer's presence in both firms may, in effect, merge the two practices into one for conflicts purposes, which could have significant ethical implications.

Additionally, the legal profession is built on trust and loyalty. Working with two firms may create a perception of divided loyalties, especially if the firms are in direct competition or have differing interests. This could potentially damage the lawyer's reputation and the reputation of the firms involved. It is important to note that the ethical implications may extend beyond the lawyer in question to the firms they are associated with, as they may be deemed to represent every client of that practice.

While there may be situations where lawyers can ethically work with multiple firms, such as holding a status of "of counsel" at one firm while being a partner at another, it is crucial to proceed with caution. Lawyers must be diligent in checking for conflicts, obtaining necessary approvals, and ensuring transparency with all parties involved. Failure to do so could result in disciplinary action, damage to their professional reputation, and a breach of trust with clients and firms.

Multiple job policies

Lawyers intending to work for two firms concurrently have an ethical obligation to inform both employers of their multiple employment. However, this may not be well-received by either employer, and it could lead to confusion and complications.

For example, a lawyer working on the same case for two different firms could unintentionally create conflicting messages for the opposing party. Additionally, the lawyer's time and resources could be spread too thin, leading to unnecessary duplication of work and increased costs. This could result in a weaker case for the client.

Therefore, while it may be possible for a lawyer to work for two firms, it is essential to carefully consider the ethical implications and potential challenges that may arise. It is also crucial to disclose such arrangements to all parties involved to avoid any potential issues.

Employment approval

It is not uncommon for lawyers to work with multiple law firms at the same time. For example, a lawyer might have the status of "of counsel" at another firm in town, or they may volunteer at a community legal services office. However, it is important to consider the potential ethical implications, particularly regarding conflict of interest.

When a lawyer is associated with a law practice, they are deemed by the legal ethics doctrine to represent every client of that practice. This means that if a lawyer works with two firms, the two practices effectively become one for conflict purposes. As a result, sharing client lists across firms may breach the lawyers' confidentiality and fiduciary duties.

To navigate these ethical challenges, lawyers often set up screens to separate their work for different firms. While this arrangement can be practical, it may not always align with substantive ethical rules and guidance. The ethical implications of such "jury-rigged" practices are complex and require further examination.

It is essential for lawyers seeking to work with multiple firms to carefully review the policies of both firms. Many firms explicitly prohibit having other employment without their approval, especially if it is with another law firm. Checking the employee handbook and seeking guidance from human resources or firm management is crucial before pursuing such an arrangement.

Frequently asked questions