Municipal Powers: Can They Override Common Law Easements?

The creation of easements is governed by a variety of laws, including common law, case law, and statutory law. An easement is a non-possessory right to use another's land for a specific purpose, and they can be created for many reasons. For example, utility easements allow utility companies to install and maintain equipment, while public easements permit the public to use private property for streets and sidewalks. In the case of reciprocal easements, property owners agree upon an easement that offers benefits and burdens for each affected parcel. While most easements are created in writing, oral agreements are invalid under the statute of frauds. The recent enactment of Section 704.09, Fla. Stat. in Florida has raised questions about the coexistence of this statute and the common law merger doctrine, which automatically extinguishes easements created by a single owner on their own property. This has sparked discussions about whether the new statute overrides the merger doctrine and the potential impact on implied easements.

Local laws and ordinances

In Texas, for instance, the Texas State Law Library offers legal research guides to assist individuals and legal practitioners in navigating neighbour law and easement-related issues. These guides provide valuable information on the various types of easements, such as utility, public, and private easements, and help users locate their local laws and ordinances pertaining to easements.

Similarly, in Colorado, there are specific provisions governing easements. For example, Colorado law recognises the concept of "easements in gross," which grants an individual the personal right to use another's property without attaching the easement to the land itself. This differs from the traditional common law treatment of easements in gross as non-transferable. Colorado law also highlights the increasing importance of "light and view plane easements" in urban development, where property owners agree to restrictions on their land use to preserve light and views for neighbouring properties.

Florida, on the other hand, presents an interesting legal landscape with the recent enactment of Section 704.09, Fla. Stat., which appears to diverge from the common law of easements. This new statute validates easements created by a single owner on their own property, potentially conflicting with the common law merger doctrine. The interaction between these two principles has raised complex legal questions that may require judicial clarification.

It is worth noting that local laws and ordinances regarding easements can address a range of topics, including the creation, maintenance, and scope of easements. For instance, local regulations may outline the responsibilities of property owners and local governments in maintaining public easements, such as mowing grass and clearing overgrown vegetation. Understanding these local laws is crucial for all parties involved, including property owners, neighbouring landowners, and municipal authorities.

Maintenance responsibilities

In the case of multiple owners of an easement, each owner must share the cost of maintaining the easement according to their level of usage. If there is an agreement in place, this will dictate the maintenance responsibilities and costs. If there is no agreement, each owner is responsible for their proportionate share of the cost based on their use. In some cases, local governments may share responsibility for maintaining public easements, particularly in urban and suburban areas.

The law in California regarding the use, creation, and maintenance of easements is particularly complex and well-litigated. It is recommended that property owners and real estate professionals in California seek the expertise of a qualified Real Estate Attorney to navigate these issues.

In Texas, if the easement is not in writing, the person granted the easement is generally responsible for its maintenance under Texas common law. Local laws may also apply, and a local government may issue fines to a property owner who fails to maintain easements on their property.

To avoid disputes, it is advisable to have a clear agreement in place that delineates maintenance responsibilities, sets out a procedure for maintenance, and establishes a process for resolving disputes.

Utility company access

Utility easements are a common issue for homeowners, as they allow public utilities like sewage, electricity, water, etc., to exist. Utility companies need these easements to be compliant with real estate law. They are created by conveying a property deed, contract, or will, and usually require the same procedures as transferring other private property interests.

Utility companies can request an easement to place electrical wires or other infrastructure on private property. As a property owner, you have the right to decide who has access to and use of your property, and you can refuse a utility easement request, especially if there are alternate properties that the company could use. However, if the public would benefit from the easement, you might be taken to court if you refuse to grant it voluntarily.

Utility easements can be created by implication, and an implied utility easement exists when utility poles are necessary for the operation of buildings on a parcel of land, or when utility lines run through a single piece of land that was later divided into different parcels. Utility access easements can also be created through prescriptive use. An easement in gross grants a specific individual the right to use another's property. For example, a landowner may grant a utility company the right to construct a pipeline or power lines through, across, or under the property.

If a utility company abuses its easement rights, you can file a lawsuit asking for an injunction (stop order) or monetary damages. If a utility company trespasses on your property without an easement, you can file a trespass suit, but you should first ensure that the company does not have an implied easement or an easement by prescriptive use. If there is a written easement contract, it may contain an expiration date, and a utility easement can end by its terms. An easement not used for its intended purpose may be extinguished, but abuse of an easement area by the holder is not always cause for termination. Repeated abuse that interferes with a landowner's possession and property value could increase the likelihood of termination.

Implied vs express easements

An easement is a legal tool that allows individuals to access certain areas that would otherwise encroach on other areas. They are often created to give individuals a means of ingress and egress to their properties, which may involve crossing their neighbour's property.

Express Easements

Express easements are formal agreements that are created by a deed or will or property conveyance. They are written agreements or legal documents that reflect the express intent of the parties involved. They can be created when a property owner conveys land to another but reserves an easement in it, known as an "easement by reservation". Express easements can be affirmative or negative. Affirmative easements grant the holder the right to use a stated portion of land for a specific purpose, such as accessing a local public beach. Negative easements, on the other hand, are a legally binding promise that prohibits what an owner may do with a property, such as building a structure that blocks the original owner's view.

Implied Easements

Implied easements are informal agreements that arise from certain circumstances, particularly the configuration of the land. They are not written down and do not come with a contractual agreement but are still legally binding. Implied easements are reasonably necessary for the enjoyment of the original piece of property and are usually created when a property owner sells a portion of their property or subdivides it and sells the entire parcel. They do not allow ownership of a portion of another party's property but allow someone to trespass on it as long as it does not disrupt the property owner's enjoyment of their property.

Municipal Override of Common Law Easements

Municipalities may have local laws regulating easements within their area. For example, a local government may share responsibility with a property owner for maintaining a public easement. In Texas, the local government may issue fines to a property owner who fails to maintain easements on their property.

Common law vs statutory law

The interplay between common law and statutory law is a complex topic, and this complexity is evident in the question of whether a municipal can override a common law easement. While I can provide an overview of the differences between common law and statutory law, the specifics of whether a municipal can override a common law easement may require legal expertise.

Common law, also known as case law, is uncodified, meaning it is not compiled into rules and statutes. Instead, it relies on past judicial opinions and precedent to guide current and future cases. This flexibility allows common law to evolve and respond to societal changes, with judges playing a crucial role in shaping it through their interpretations. Common law is particularly useful for addressing unforeseen advancements and emerging legal issues.

On the other hand, statutory law, also known as civil law, is based on current statutes (written laws) enacted by the legislature and government of a country. Statutory law is codified and encompasses compiled legislation passed at the local, state, or federal level. It is strict in its application and provides standardized rules that offer clarity and predictability. Statutory law addresses specific societal concerns, fills gaps in common law, and provides explicit rules applicable to all.

The UK legal system, for example, is built upon the dual foundation of common law and statutory law, with each contributing distinct characteristics. Common law, with its roots in ancient customs and traditions, forms the bedrock of the country's legal system. Statutory law, on the other hand, provides a more modern layer of legislation created by Parliament.

In the context of easements, the type of easement and the specific jurisdiction's laws would determine whether a municipal can override a common law easement. Easements can be created for various reasons and can be categorized as utility, public, or private easements. They can be express (in writing) or implied. While some jurisdictions may favour common law, others may lean towards statutory law when interpreting easements. For instance, in Texas, public easements often result in shared responsibility for maintenance between the local government and the property owner.

Frequently asked questions