The Thin Blue Line: Degrading Or Serving?

Law enforcement officers are meant to serve the community and protect all persons against illegal acts. However, there have been instances of police misconduct, including excessive force, sexual misconduct, theft, false arrest, and deliberate indifference to serious medical needs or substantial risks of harm to persons in custody. Such misconduct is investigated and prosecuted by the Department of Justice, which enforces constitutional limits on law enforcement conduct. While the vast majority of law enforcement officers carry out their duties with respect for their communities, there are incidents where this is not the case. Law enforcement officers are expected to uphold high standards of professionalism, ethics, and respect for human rights and dignity.

Law enforcement officers must respect human dignity and uphold human rights

Law enforcement officers are duty-bound to respect human dignity and uphold the human rights of all persons. This is enshrined in Article 2 of the United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner's Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials of 1979. The Code of Conduct further states that no law enforcement officer may inflict, instigate, or tolerate any act of torture or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment. This prohibition is derived from the Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Being Subjected to Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which was adopted by the General Assembly. The Declaration states that such acts are "an offence to human dignity and shall be condemned as a denial of the purposes of the Charter of the United Nations".

The relationship between human rights and law enforcement is an important one, with multiple international instruments outlining the responsibilities of law enforcement officials in upholding human rights. These include the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and the International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid, among others.

Amnesty International emphasizes the importance of this relationship, highlighting that while the UDHR places responsibility on every individual to uphold its mandates, there is a particular emphasis on those in law enforcement. This is reflected in the numerous articles made specifically for law enforcement work, such as the UN Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials, the UN Standard Minimum Rules, and the UN Body of Principles.

The authority to use force by law enforcement officials is derived from the duty of the State to maintain public order and ensure human rights and the rule of law. However, the use of force must be regulated to prevent arbitrary, excessive, or discriminatory uses of force and to ensure accountability in cases of abuse. International human rights law provides the international legal framework for this regulation, and it is imperative that States comply with their obligations in this regard. National law also typically restricts the use of force by law enforcement, with the principle of proportionality dictating that the use of force should be limited to what is necessary to achieve a legitimate objective. The use of firearms, in particular, is considered an extreme measure and should be avoided whenever possible, especially against children.

In addition to respecting human dignity and upholding human rights, law enforcement officials have a duty to serve the community and protect all persons against illegal acts, consistent with the high degree of responsibility required by their profession. This includes providing medical attention to victims of violations of the law or accidents occurring during the course of violations. Law enforcement officials must also refrain from any acts of corruption or abuse of authority, as these acts are incompatible with the profession.

Officers must not instigate or tolerate cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment

Law enforcement officers are duty-bound to protect the human rights of all persons. This includes the human right to be free from cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment, as outlined in the Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Being Subjected to Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. This declaration was adopted by the General Assembly and is considered an offence to human dignity. It is a violation of the human rights and fundamental freedoms proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights instruments.

The Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials by OHCHR states that no law enforcement official may inflict, instigate, or tolerate any act of torture or other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment. This prohibition extends to exceptional circumstances such as war, national security threats, or public emergencies. Law enforcement officers must also respect and protect human dignity and uphold the human rights of all persons, as outlined in the Code of Conduct.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) in the United States investigates and prosecutes allegations of Constitutional violations by law enforcement officers. This includes violations such as excessive force, sexual misconduct, theft, false arrest, and deliberate indifference to serious medical needs or substantial risks of harm to persons in custody. These investigations cover a range of law enforcement officials, including police officers, correctional officers, and federal, state, or local officials.

In addition to Constitutional violations, the DOJ also prosecutes law enforcement officers for related instances of obstruction of justice. Federal laws enforced by the DOJ address police misconduct and provide a mechanism for individuals to file complaints if they believe their rights have been violated. These laws cover the actions of state, county, and local officers, as well as federal law enforcement officers. The DOJ's goal in criminal cases is to punish wrongdoers for past misconduct, while in civil cases, the focus is on correcting the policies and practices that led to the misconduct.

It is important to note that the majority of law enforcement officers perform their duties with respect for their communities and in compliance with the law. However, there are incidents where this is not the case, and it is crucial for law enforcement officials to uphold the highest standards of conduct and protect the rights of all individuals.

Officers must not engage in nonconsensual sexual contact with persons in custody

Law enforcement officers are expected to uphold the law and protect the human rights of all persons. They are duty-bound to respect and protect human dignity, as outlined in the Code of Conduct for Law Enforcement Officials by the OHCHR. This code of conduct prohibits law enforcement officials from inflicting, instigating, or tolerating any act of torture, cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment.

Despite this, there have been incidents of law enforcement officers engaging in nonconsensual sexual contact with persons in their custody, which is a violation of the law and an abuse of their authority. This type of misconduct includes sexual assault without consent (rape), sexual contact procured by force, threat of force, or coercion, and unwanted or gratuitous sexual contact such as touching or groping.

The Department of Justice investigates and prosecutes allegations of Constitutional violations by law enforcement officers, including sexual misconduct. These cases often involve police officers, federal and state probation officers, wardens, and corrections officers. To prove that a law enforcement officer violated a victim's right to bodily integrity, the prosecution must establish a lack of consent or submission by the victim.

To address this issue, some states, including New York, Maryland, Kansas, and Louisiana, have passed or are considering legislation that criminalizes any sexual encounter, consensual or nonconsensual, between an officer and an individual in their custody. These legislative measures aim to protect individuals in police custody and hold law enforcement officers accountable for their actions.

It is essential to recognize that the power dynamic between law enforcement officers and individuals in their custody makes true consent impossible. Law enforcement officers must, therefore, refrain from any sexual contact with persons in their custody to uphold the law and protect the rights and dignity of those in their care.

Officers must not act with deliberate indifference to a substantial risk of harm to persons in custody

Law enforcement officers are expected to uphold the law and protect the human rights of all persons. This includes respecting and protecting human dignity and maintaining human rights as identified and protected by national and international law.

• The victim faced a substantial risk of serious harm.
• The officer had actual knowledge of the risk of harm.
• The officer failed to take reasonable measures to address the harm.

For example, if an officer is aware that an inmate has a serious medical need or faces a substantial risk of harm, they must take reasonable measures to address the medical need or risk. This includes situations where there is a risk that an inmate will be assaulted by other inmates or officers. An officer who fails to intervene in such a situation may be prosecuted for failure to stop a Constitutional violation.

Additionally, law enforcement officers who engage in nonconsensual sexual contact with persons in their custody are violating the right to bodily integrity. The Department of Justice investigates and prosecutes instances of sexual misconduct, including sexual assault without consent, sexual contact procured by force or coercion, and unwanted sexual contact.

Officers must have the courage to intervene and protect their colleagues from crossing inappropriate boundaries

Law enforcement officers play a prominent role in society and wield a great deal of authority and power. They are tasked with the responsibility of protecting the community and upholding the rights of all persons. This includes respecting and protecting human dignity and preventing any form of cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment. While the majority of law enforcement officers carry out their duties with integrity, there have been incidents of misconduct.

Officers must, therefore, hold each other accountable and have the courage to intervene when they observe a colleague crossing inappropriate boundaries. This is essential to maintaining the integrity of the force and ensuring the protection of citizens' rights. It is not enough for officers to simply follow the rules themselves; they must also be willing to speak up and stop any misconduct they witness. This can be challenging, as it may involve confronting fellow officers, but it is crucial for maintaining trust in law enforcement.

In some cases, officers who fail to intervene when they observe misconduct may be prosecuted for failure to stop a Constitutional violation. For example, if an officer is aware that a colleague is violating someone's Constitutional rights, they have an opportunity to intervene, and they choose not to, they may be held liable. This is because they are obligated to protect citizens from illegal acts and uphold the law at all times.

Additionally, officers must be aware of their own biases and ensure that they do not cross inappropriate boundaries themselves. This includes understanding the concept of "tactical civility," which involves maintaining civility, especially in explosive circumstances, to benefit their safety and disguise their tactical advantage. Officers with appropriate "bedside manner" can avoid many of the hazards prevalent in policing. It is also important for officers to have a solid understanding of the law and their own agency's policies to ensure they do not overstep their boundaries.

In conclusion, officers must have the courage to intervene and protect their colleagues from crossing inappropriate boundaries. This requires a strong sense of ethics and a commitment to upholding the law and protecting citizens' rights. By holding each other accountable, law enforcement officers can maintain the trust of the communities they serve and ensure that any misconduct is swiftly addressed.

Frequently asked questions