Police Discretion: Ignoring Laws, Right Or Wrong?

Police officers are tasked with enforcing the law, but what happens when they break the law or refuse to enforce it? In the US, police officers must obey the law, on or off duty, and can be punished for committing a crime. Police misconduct is addressed by the Department of Justice (DOJ), which protects all persons in the US, citizens and non-citizens alike. While police officers have a duty to enforce the law, they can also use their discretion to decide when it's necessary to speak to someone. In some cases, sheriffs, who are elected officials responsible for keeping the peace within a county, may choose not to enforce certain laws, particularly when state and federal laws conflict.

Police officers must obey the law and can be punished for misconduct

While police officers are tasked with enforcing the law, they are also subject to it and must obey the law themselves. Police officers are not exempt from the law, and if they break it, they can be punished just like any other citizen. Courts hold police officers accountable for their wrongdoing, misconduct, and illegal acts, and they can face the same penalties as members of the public, including imprisonment, fines, and probation.

Police officers have a duty to uphold the law and protect the public, but they must do so within the boundaries of the law and by respecting citizens' rights. For example, they must have a warrant or probable cause to conduct a search and seizure or to stop a vehicle. They are prohibited from engaging in false arrests, racial profiling, excessive force, corruption, or planting evidence, among other illegal acts. If a police officer is found guilty of domestic violence, a hit-and-run, or any other crime, they can be sentenced to the same punishments as anyone else.

In the United States, the Department of Justice (DOJ) enforces laws that address police misconduct and outline the rights of citizens during police encounters. These laws cover both criminal and civil statutes and apply to state, county, and local law enforcement officers, as well as those working in prisons and jails. Citizens can file complaints with the DOJ if they believe their rights have been violated by law enforcement. Federal laws prohibit discrimination based on race, colour, national origin, sex, and religion by law enforcement agencies receiving funding from the DOJ.

Additionally, sheriffs, who are typically elected officials responsible for keeping the peace and enforcing criminal laws within a county, have a significant amount of discretion in choosing which laws to enforce. They may refuse to support federal agencies if they believe it would hurt public trust, and they often abide by state laws that contradict federal laws without facing legal consequences.

Police cannot abuse their power to arrest without cause

While police officers have the duty to make arrests, serve warrants, and perform other law enforcement tasks, they cannot abuse their power to arrest citizens without cause. In the United States, citizens have the right to remain silent and do not have to answer police questions, except for providing their name in some places. Refusing to answer questions may arouse suspicion, but it is not grounds for arrest. If an officer has a valid reason to briefly detain a person to investigate a potential wrongdoing, the person's refusal to answer questions cannot be used as probable cause for an arrest.

However, it is important to note that police officers can legally lie and use intimidation tactics to obtain a response. While citizens can refuse to answer questions, it is crucial to remain calm and respectful during encounters with law enforcement. Arguing or exhibiting hostility can escalate the situation and lead to potential harm.

In certain situations, citizens may choose to ignore police officers or refuse to answer their questions. For example, in the United States, individuals are not required to submit to roadside sobriety tests. While refusing these tests may result in legal detention until a blood sample is provided, it is within an individual's rights to decline. Additionally, police officers cannot confiscate or view photographs or videos without a warrant, and citizens have the right to record events that are visible in public spaces as long as they do not obstruct the officers' activities.

While police officers have the responsibility to enforce the law, they also have discretion in how they choose to do so. Sheriffs, for instance, often have the power to decide which laws should be enforced by the officers working under them, especially when state and local laws are in flux. In some cases, sheriffs may refuse to support federal agencies if they believe their actions could hurt public trust. Ultimately, while citizens have rights during police encounters, it is important to carefully assess the risks associated with asserting those rights, as officers may still choose to make unlawful arrests or use force.

Citizens must know their legal rights when interacting with police

While police officers are tasked with enforcing the law, citizens also have rights that must be respected during police interactions. It is important for citizens to know their legal rights when dealing with the police, as this knowledge can help protect them and ensure fair treatment.

In the United States, citizens have the right to remain silent and do not have to answer police questions beyond providing basic identifying information, such as their name and address. It is advisable to remain silent and ask to speak to a lawyer, as anything one says to the police may be used as evidence. Citizens should also be aware that police officers are legally permitted to lie and use intimidation tactics to obtain information.

Additionally, citizens have the right to refuse consent to searches of their persons or property. However, police officers may pat down an individual's clothing if they suspect a weapon is present. While refusing consent may not always stop a search, it is important to make a timely objection to preserve one's rights in any subsequent legal proceedings.

The right to record law enforcement officers in public spaces is another important right that citizens should be aware of. Recording interactions can help ensure accountability and provide evidence in the event of any misconduct or abuse of power. However, it is important to remain at a safe distance and not obstruct the officers' movements when recording.

In certain situations, citizens may also be within their rights to ignore the police. For example, in the United States, individuals are not required to submit to roadside sobriety tests, although refusing to do so may result in other legal requirements, such as providing a blood sample.

It is worth noting that while citizens have these legal rights, there are also risks involved in exercising them. For instance, refusing to answer questions or cooperate with the police may lead to suspicion and potentially adverse consequences. Therefore, citizens must carefully consider their actions and understand the possible outcomes of their decisions during police interactions.

Sheriffs can refuse to enforce certain laws

Unlike regular police officers, who often serve within city limits, sheriffs are typically elected officials who serve to keep the peace and enforce criminal laws within a county. They have a variety of duties, including making arrests, managing county jails, serving warrants and civil papers, and regulating bail bondsmen. Because state and local laws are constantly changing, sheriffs have a lot of power in deciding which laws their officers should enforce daily.

It is not uncommon for sheriffs to refuse to enforce certain laws. For example, in California and North Carolina, sheriffs refused to support federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials who were organizing immigration raids. The sheriffs believed that participating in these raids would hurt public trust in their office. In addition, sheriffs in some states have publicly announced that they will not enforce new gun safety laws, claiming that these laws violate the Second Amendment of the US Constitution.

Sheriffs who refuse to enforce duly enacted state laws can be seen as violating their oaths and shirking their duties. Citizens can use a writ of mandamus to go to court and get an order directing a sheriff or other government official to carry out non-discretionary legal obligations. Sheriffs who publicly declare that they will not enforce new gun regulations should expect to be sued. In addition, sheriffs who refuse to carry out safety measures, such as conducting background checks on the purchase of assault weapons, also face the risk of being sued and held financially responsible if the firearm is then used to kill or injure someone.

Citizens have the right to remain silent and ask for a lawyer

While police officers are not permitted to ignore or refuse to enforce laws, sheriffs—who are typically elected officials serving to keep the peace and enforce criminal laws within a county—hold a lot of power and can choose not to enforce certain laws. This is because state and local laws are constantly changing, and it is the sheriff's duty to decide which laws should be enforced by officers working under them. For example, in California and North Carolina, sheriffs refused to support federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials who were organizing immigration raids.

Now, when it comes to citizens' rights, it is important to understand that citizens have the right to remain silent and ask for a lawyer. This is protected by the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which states that no person "shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself." This right allows individuals to refuse to answer questions or provide information that could potentially incriminate them. However, it is important to note that this is not an absolute right, and there may be situations where remaining silent can be used as incriminating evidence. For example, in the Salinas v. Texas case, the Supreme Court held that the defendant's silence and behavioral changes during questioning were admissible as incriminating evidence since the defendant did not expressly invoke their Fifth Amendment rights.

Therefore, if you are stopped by a police officer and asked questions, you have the right to remain silent and not answer their questions. In some states, you may be required to provide your name, but you are not obligated to provide any additional information. It is also important to remain calm and polite during these encounters and clearly state that you wish to remain silent or speak to an attorney. Keep in mind that police officers are allowed to lie and use intimidation tactics to get a response, but you have the right to stand your ground and refuse to speak without an attorney present.

Additionally, if you are an immigrant or non-citizen, it is important to understand your rights when interacting with law enforcement. If you are detained by ICE or Border Patrol, you have the right to remain silent, ask for a lawyer, and refuse to answer questions about your immigration status. However, if you are a lawful permanent resident (LPR), you may be required to answer questions establishing your identity and permanent residency. In any case, it is crucial to know your rights and assert them respectfully to protect yourself.

Frequently asked questions