Prenup Agreements: State Laws And Their Jurisdiction

Prenuptial agreements are a common way for couples to protect their assets and financial interests in the event of a divorce. However, the laws governing prenuptial agreements vary across different states, and it can be challenging to determine which state's laws apply when a couple moves across state lines or has connections to multiple states. This complexity is further compounded by the lack of consistent patterns in court decisions regarding choice-of-law rules. While prenuptial agreements generally include a choice-of-law provision to specify the applicable state laws, courts may not enforce these provisions if they conflict with the public policy of the state where the divorce is filed. In such cases, courts may apply their own discretion or consider the state with the most significant connection to the agreement or the parties.

Prenuptial agreements are governed by state law

Prenuptial agreements, also known as prenups, are written contracts entered into by a couple before marriage or a civil union. They allow couples to select and control many of the legal rights they acquire upon marrying, and what happens when their marriage ends by death or divorce. In the United States, prenuptial agreements are recognised in all fifty states and the District of Columbia, and they are enforceable if prepared by state and federal law requirements.

When signing a prenuptial agreement, it is crucial that the provisions are thorough, detailed, and in the best interests of both parties. Couples should also be aware of the applicable state law and ensure that their prenuptial agreement complies with the requirements of that state. For example, a written contract is essential to a valid and enforceable prenup. Additionally, an attorney from the state in which the prenuptial agreement is signed should include strong disclosure provisions of both parties at the time of signing to prevent unequal outcomes.

In the case that a couple moves to another state and then files for divorce, the courts will use what is called "Choice of Law" to interpret the contents of the prenuptial agreement. However, there are some exceptions to Choice of Law. For instance, the current state may choose not to enforce the prenuptial agreement if it is not "fair and reasonable" according to their laws. Therefore, it is important to consider the possibility of moving to another state during the drafting process and retain attorneys in both states to cover this eventuality.

Choice of law provisions

Prenuptial agreements are a common feature of marriages where one or both parties have substantial income or assets. These agreements are legal documents that outline the division and ownership of assets in the event of a divorce. They are governed by state law, and each state has its own prenup laws.

When it comes to prenuptial agreements, the choice of law refers to the specific state law that will be used to enforce the agreement. This is an important consideration, especially if the prenuptial agreement is signed in one state, but the couple later moves to another state and files for divorce. In such cases, the choice of law provision in the prenuptial agreement determines which state's law will govern the enforcement of the agreement.

For example, a couple might draft their prenuptial agreement under Nevada law because they reside there at the time. However, if they later move to New York and decide to divorce, the choice of law provision in their prenuptial agreement will specify whether Nevada or New York law will be used to enforce the agreement. This provision is included because couples may relocate easily, and upon divorce, they would still need their prenuptial agreement to be enforced under a specific state's law.

While the choice of law provision is important, it is not the only factor considered by courts. Courts may also examine the larger legal framework and apply their own two-look" test to determine the enforceability of prenuptial agreements. They will consider whether the agreement was fair and reasonable at the time it was made and remains fair and reasonable at the time of divorce. Additionally, if the prenuptial agreement is not deemed "fair and reasonable" according to the laws of the current state of residence, the court may choose not to enforce it.

To ensure the enforceability of a prenuptial agreement across different states, it is crucial to include strong disclosure provisions and prevent unequal outcomes. Accurate reporting of finances and assets at the time of signing is essential, as failure to do so is a commonly cited reason for an unenforced prenuptial agreement.

Child custody and child support arrangements

In the United States, each state has its own laws regarding child custody and support. For example, in Illinois, the court considers the child's wishes, the parent's wishes, the child's adjustment to their home, school, and community, and the mental and physical health of all individuals involved. Despite varying laws across states, it is important to note that matters related to child custody and support are governed by the principle of "best interests of the child." This means that any agreements or decisions made must prioritize the child's happiness, development, and overall well-being.

While prenuptial agreements cannot explicitly include provisions related to child custody or support, they can still address these issues indirectly. Couples can include financial arrangements and provisions that benefit the parents, understanding that the children will also reap these benefits. For example, they can waive their right to alimony, decide on the distribution of assets and debts, or specify provisions for premarital or jointly owned property.

Additionally, while not legally binding, prenuptial agreements can include provisions outlining how the couple intends to co-parent their children in the event of a divorce. These provisions can cover matters such as shared custody, primary custody, and visitation rights. However, it is crucial to consult with a family law attorney to ensure that any provisions included in the prenuptial agreement comply with state laws and are in the best interests of the child.

In the United Kingdom, prenuptial agreements are not legally binding, but they can still address child custody and support arrangements. Similar to the United States, the Children Act 1989 governs child custody matters in the UK, prioritizing the child's best interests. While a court will always make the final decision on custody based on this principle, prenuptial agreements can provide a framework for co-parenting and help prevent disputes.

Division of assets

Prenuptial agreements are a couple's opportunity to decide what will happen to their assets should their marriage end, either by divorce or death. In the absence of a prenup, state law will determine how assets are divided.

Each state has separate laws that govern what types of property constitute separate property and what types constitute marital property. Some states use "community property" laws, requiring 50/50 asset splits, while others use the idea of equitable distribution. In community property states, assets acquired after marriage are owned by each spouse equally, while assets acquired before the marriage may be separate or mixed property. In equitable distribution states, the court decides what constitutes a fair division of property.

Prenuptial agreements can change the rules of state law with respect to the division of property. For example, prenups can define which assets are separate property not subject to division, limit how much property or value may be allocated to a spouse, or include a sliding scale that allocates more property to a spouse in a longer marriage. They can also specify how joint assets will be divided in the event of a divorce, and how assets or debts accumulated during the marriage will be treated.

Prenuptial agreements are particularly common when there is a significant disparity between the intended spouses' incomes and/or assets, or when one party is bringing a significant amount of debt into the marriage. They are also common when one or both parties have children from a previous marriage and want to ensure they inherit some of their property.

It is important to note that prenuptial agreements cannot include anything illegal, and they cannot include child support or child custody issues as these are decided by the court based on the best interests of the child. Additionally, prenups must be fair to both parties at the time they are signed and at the time of divorce, and they must be entered into with a full and fair disclosure of all assets by both spouses.

Enforceability of prenuptial agreements

In the United States, prenuptial agreements are governed by state law, and each state has its own prenup laws. While there are some similarities in prenup requirements across states, there are also some contradictory requirements. For instance, in many states, the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (UPAA) sets forth the rules and guidelines that apply to prenuptial agreements. The UPAA was drafted in 1983 to ensure consistency in the creation and enforcement of formal prenuptial contracts. However, South Carolina is one notable exception that does not abide by the UPAA.

When it comes to enforceability, the courts will generally view a prenuptial agreement as valid and enforceable if certain conditions are met. These conditions include the absence of fraud, duress, mistake, misrepresentation, or failure to disclose material information. Additionally, the agreement must be in writing, signed by both parties, and witnessed to be considered enforceable. Oral agreements or those not properly executed may not hold up in court.

It is important to note that prenuptial agreements cannot override state laws in certain areas, such as child custody and child support arrangements. While couples may include provisions in their prenuptial agreement regarding these matters, a judge will ultimately apply the state's child custody and support laws in the event of a divorce.

To ensure the enforceability of a prenuptial agreement, it is crucial to accurately report finances and assets during the drafting process. Seeking legal advice from an attorney who can include strong disclosure provisions is essential. Additionally, it is recommended to periodically review and update the agreement to reflect any changes in circumstances, ensuring that it remains fair and reasonable over time.

In the United Kingdom, prenuptial agreements were not always enforceable, but this changed on 20 October 2010 when the highest court in the land gave judicial weight to these agreements. While a judge in the UK may give weight to a prenuptial agreement, they will also consider the fairness of the deal, the capacity of the weaker party to have said no, and the circumstances that have arisen over time.

Frequently asked questions