How Presidents Can Influence And Cancel Laws

While the President of the United States has the power to enforce laws passed by Congress, they cannot cancel or change a law. The President can make suggestions about things that should be new laws, but they cannot make laws themselves. The President can, however, veto or sign bills. The President's power to remove officials has been challenged in court, with more than 50 lawsuits filed against President Donald Trump's efforts to fire executive branch officials. Additionally, the President cannot change the Constitution by executive order, as this would require a two-thirds vote in both the House and the Senate, as well as ratification by three-quarters of the states.

Can a President Cancel a Law?

The president cannot change the Constitution by executive order

While the president of the United States has a significant amount of power, there are limits to what they can do. One notable limitation is that the president cannot change the Constitution through an executive order. This means they cannot unilaterally alter or repeal parts of the Constitution, even if they disagree with certain provisions.

The Constitution is the supreme law of the land in the United States, and it outlines the powers and duties of the federal government, including the executive branch, which the president leads. Any changes or amendments to the Constitution require a rigorous process that involves both Congress and the states. This process is deliberately designed to be challenging to ensure that any modifications to the foundational document of the country are thoroughly considered and widely supported.

In the case of the 14th Amendment, for example, President Trump attempted to use an executive order to take away the citizenship guarantee enshrined in this amendment. This guarantee, established over 150 years ago, states that all persons born or naturalized in the United States are citizens, regardless of their parentage, skin colour, or ethnicity. However, the president's efforts were unsuccessful because the Constitution cannot be amended solely through executive action.

To amend the Constitution, a rigorous process must be followed. It requires a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and even then, the amendment must be ratified by three-quarters of the states. This process ensures that any changes to the Constitution reflect the values and interests of the majority of Americans and safeguard against impulsive or partisan changes.

While the president has the power to enforce laws, represent the nation in foreign talks, and veto or sign bills, they cannot make laws or interpret them. The power to make laws rests with Congress, which consists of the House of Representatives and the Senate. This separation of powers is a fundamental aspect of the American political system and is intended to prevent any single branch or individual from having too much power.

The president can veto and sign bills

The US Constitution outlines the powers of the president, and while it does grant them the power to veto and sign bills, there are limitations. The president can veto, or reject, a bill passed by Congress, but their veto can be overridden if two-thirds of both houses of Congress vote to do so. This is a significant check on the president's power to reject bills.

The president can also sign bills into law, but this power is also limited. The president cannot create laws themselves; they can only sign bills that have been passed by Congress. This is an important distinction, as it ensures that the legislative power remains with Congress, and the president's role is to approve or reject those laws.

The power to veto and sign bills is a key aspect of the president's role in the legislative process. It allows them to influence the creation of laws and ensure that the laws passed by Congress are in line with their policies and agenda. However, it is important to note that the president cannot change or cancel existing laws through this process alone.

While the president can veto and sign bills, they cannot use this power to override or change the Constitution. For example, President Trump attempted to use an executive order to take away the citizenship guarantee in the 14th Amendment, but this was not legally possible. Amending the Constitution requires a two-thirds vote in both houses of Congress and ratification by three-quarters of the states, a much more rigorous process.

In conclusion, while the president can veto and sign bills, their power is balanced by the legislative power of Congress and the existence of the Constitution, which cannot be changed by executive order or a simple bill.

The president can remove executive officers without the Senate's consent

The US Constitution does not explicitly mention the power to remove officials from their offices. However, the Supreme Court has ruled that the President has the power to remove executive officers without the Senate's consent. This power stems from the President's executive authority and their duty to ensure that laws are faithfully executed.

The Myers case in 1926 is a key example of this. The Postmaster General, acting on the President's orders, removed a first-class postmaster from office. The Court upheld this decision, stating that the President has the authority to remove executive officers at will. This case set a precedent for the President's removal power.

In another case, Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Bd., the Court addressed whether an inferior officer could be protected from the President's removal authority by a principal officer who was also protected from removal by the President. The Court ruled that such multi-level protection from removal was contrary to the President's executive authority. This further solidified the understanding that the President has the power to remove executive officers without the need for the Senate's consent.

It is important to note that the President's removal power is not absolute. The Court has distinguished between purely" executive officers and those who exercise "quasi-legislative" and "quasi-judicial" powers. In some cases, Congress can impose "good cause" removal restrictions on certain officers, especially those with quasi-legislative or quasi-judicial functions.

While the President can remove executive officers without the Senate's consent, the appointment of such officers often requires the advice and consent of the Senate. This collaborative process between the President and the Senate ensures a balance of power and accountability in the appointment and removal of executive officers.

The president cannot make or interpret laws

While the president of a country, such as the United States, has the power to enforce and execute laws, they cannot make or interpret laws. The US president can make suggestions about things that should be new laws, but they cannot create laws themselves. This is a power reserved for Congress, which may vest the appointment of inferior officers in the President alone, in a Court of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

The US Constitution's Article II grants the president the executive power to execute the laws. The Supreme Court has interpreted this to mean that the president has the power to select and remove those who act under them in executing the laws. However, the president cannot remove officials protected by a 'good cause' removal limit imposed by Congress.

The president also cannot change the US Constitution with an executive order. For example, President Trump attempted to change the 14th Amendment, which guarantees citizenship to those born in the US, with an executive order. However, the ACLU filed a lawsuit against this, arguing that the president cannot change the Constitution without a two-thirds vote in the House and Senate and ratification by three-quarters of the states.

In summary, while the president has some influence over the law-making process, they cannot make or interpret laws themselves. This power is instead vested in Congress and the Supreme Court, which can interpret laws through cases.

The president can enforce the laws that Congress passes

While the president of the United States does not execute laws himself, he is responsible for ensuring that his subordinates execute the laws passed by Congress faithfully. This is outlined in Article II, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution, also known as the "take care clause".

The "take care clause" states that the president "shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed". This clause has been interpreted to mean that the president has the power to supervise the executive departments and ensure that laws are carried out. If the heads of these departments fail to execute the laws faithfully, the president may remove them.

The president's duty to enforce the laws passed by Congress is one of his most important responsibilities as the leader of the executive branch. It is also a check on the legislative branch, as Congress can counter the president by refusing to pass legislation he favours or by cutting off funds to executive agencies.

While the president is generally expected to enforce the laws passed by Congress, there may be times when he chooses not to do so. For example, recent presidents have chosen not to enforce federal laws against marijuana use in states where it has been legalised. Additionally, the president cannot enforce laws that violate the U.S. Constitution, such as a law that attempts to supersede the federal government's oversight of immigration enforcement.

Frequently asked questions