States' Legislative Powers: Narrowing Federal Constitution Laws

The relationship between the states and the federal government is one of the most fundamental and contested aspects of constitutional theory in the United States. The Supremacy Clause establishes federal law as the law of the land, and federal laws are supreme over state laws. However, the federal government can only pass a law preempting a state law if it has authority over the subject. The Supremacy Clause also specifies that certain federal acts take priority over conflicting state acts. The Tenth Amendment further reserves some rights for the states, and the federal government cannot pass laws on everything. Ultimately, the U.S. Constitution gives the federal government ultimate authority over a narrow range of matters, leaving the rest to the states.

Federal law vs state constitution

The relationship between the states and the federal government is one of the most fundamental and contested aspects of constitutional theory in the United States. The nationalist vision holds that the federal government represents "We the People", and is thus superior to the individual states. However, the interpretation of the Constitution and the extent of federal power over the states is a complex issue that has been debated since the country's founding.

The Supremacy Clause establishes federal law as the "supreme law of the land", with federal statutes and treaties regarded as equally authoritative and subject to judicial interpretation and review. This means that federal laws and policies take priority over state laws, and the federal government can pass laws that preempt or supersede state laws, provided it has authority over the subject matter. For example, in the 1970s, the city of Burbank in California enacted a noise restriction on jet aircraft taking off or landing at their airport between 11 pm and 7 am. However, the Supreme Court held that this ordinance was preempted by the Federal Aviation Act, which established total federal control over aircraft noise regulation.

The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that the federal government only has the powers delegated to it by the Constitution. The federal government cannot pass laws on everything, and some rights are reserved for the states. For instance, it is generally not unconstitutional for a city to pass noise restrictions, and states have the power to regulate noise, which is a traditional state and local power.

While the federal government has the ultimate authority, the U.S. Constitution is designed to give it power over a relatively narrow range of matters, leaving the rest to the states. The states have the power to amend their constitutions, which often requires a simple majority vote, whereas amending the U.S. Constitution requires a much broader consensus, with a two-thirds majority in each house of Congress and ratification by three-quarters of all states. This makes it more difficult for federal laws to override state constitutions, and usually requires bipartisan support.

State law interference

The relationship between state and federal law in the United States is a complex and deeply contested issue, with no settled answer. The Supremacy Clause establishes federal law as the law of the land, and federal laws and policies are generally protected from state interference. However, the federal government can only pass a law preempting, restricting, or superseding a state law if it has authority over the subject.

The Supremacy Clause is a conflict-of-laws rule that specifies that certain federal acts take priority over conflicting state acts. This means that if a federal law conflicts with a state law, the federal law overrides the state law. The Supremacy Clause also applies to treaties, which are regarded as "supreme law" and are incorporated into federal law.

However, the Tenth Amendment states that the federal government only has the powers delegated to it by the Constitution. The US Congress cannot pass laws on everything, and some rights are reserved for the states. The federal government can only preempt state law if it has validly regulated an area so pervasively that there is no room for state involvement. For example, federal regulation on aviation and aircraft noise has preempted state and local laws on the same subject.

State laws can also be held unconstitutional if they violate constitutional provisions. For example, an Alabama tax on vessels owned by its citizens violated the constitutional prohibition against levying tonnage duties. Similarly, a Maryland law that charged non-residents higher trader's license fees than residents violated the Privileges and Immunities Clause.

In conclusion, while federal law generally takes precedence over state law, the relationship is not absolute, and there are mechanisms in place to prevent state law interference with federal law and vice versa.

Federal preemption

The relationship between the states and the federal government is one of the most fundamental and contested fault lines of constitutional theory in the US. The Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution establishes that federal law displaces, or preempts, state law when the two conflict. This is known as the preemption doctrine, which refers to the idea that a higher authority of law will displace the law of a lower authority of law when the two authorities come into conflict.

> 'no State or political subdivision thereof...shall enact or enforce any law, rule, regulation, standard, or other provision having the force and effect of law relating to rates, routes, or services of any [covered] air carrier.'

Implied preemption can occur in two ways: field preemption or conflict preemption. Implied preemption is more controversial, as it may be harder to prevent than other forms of preemption. If a state specifically authorizes an action, local governments typically cannot restrict it. Courts have issued tests to determine whether a state legislature has preempted a field by implication.

In some cases, Congress has preempted all state regulation in a particular area. For example, Congress has preempted state regulation of medical devices. In other cases, Congress allows federal regulatory agencies to set national minimum standards, but does not preempt state regulations imposing more stringent standards. For example, Congress has allowed more stringent state regulation of labels on prescription drugs.

The Supreme Court tends to portray the Hines formulation as a guide to the "pre-emptive intent" that courts should attribute to particular federal statutes. When Congress enacts a federal statute, it presumably wants to preempt state laws that would "stand[] as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress," and courts should give effect to this presumed intention.

State sovereignty

The relationship between the states and the federal government is one of the most fundamental and contested aspects of constitutional theory in the United States. The question of state sovereignty is deeply rooted in the country's history, with two opposing visions: nationalism and state sovereignty.

The nationalist vision, as articulated by Abraham Lincoln, argues that the nation preceded the states and that the Union created them. In contrast, the Declaration of Independence speaks of states taking their rightful place in the world, implying a recognition of their individual sovereignty.

The U.S. Constitution is designed to give the federal government ultimate authority over a narrow range of matters explicitly spelled out, leaving the rest to the states. This range of matters has expanded over time through constitutional amendments and broad interpretations of provisions. The Supremacy Clause of the Constitution establishes the priority of federal law over state law, ensuring that federal policies and statutes are protected from state interference. This clause has been described as an "unquestioned axiom" of the country's founding, with federal law considered the "supreme law of the land."

However, federal statutes and treaties must adhere to the Constitution's parameters and not violate constitutional limits on federal power, such as the Bill of Rights. The Tenth Amendment to the Constitution reinforces this by stating that the federal government only possesses the powers delegated to it by the Constitution. The Supreme Court plays a crucial role in interpreting the Constitution and determining the validity of federal and state laws in relation to it.

While the federal government can pass laws that supersede or restrict state laws, it must have the authority to do so. For example, the federal government has pervasive control over aviation and aircraft noise regulation, superseding state and local powers. In cases of conflict between federal and state laws, the Supremacy Clause gives priority to federal acts, ensuring that state laws do not impede the execution of federal objectives.

Supremacy Clause

The Supremacy Clause is a significant structural provision of the US Constitution, which establishes the supremacy of federal law over state law. It is considered a cornerstone of the country's federal political structure. The Supremacy Clause states:

> "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

The Supremacy Clause was introduced as part of the New Jersey Plan during the Federal Convention of 1787 and passed unanimously. It was a response to the problems with the Articles of Confederation, which lacked a provision declaring federal law superior to state law. This resulted in federal statutes not binding state courts unless there was state legislation implementing them. The Supremacy Clause assumes the underlying priority of federal authority, and all governments must act within the boundaries of the Constitution.

The Supremacy Clause has been interpreted by the Supreme Court as federal preemption, which applies regardless of whether the conflicting laws come from legislatures, courts, administrative agencies, or constitutions. Federal law can preempt state law either expressly or impliedly. Express preemption occurs when federal law contains explicit language to that effect, while implied preemption occurs when that intent is implicit in its structure and purpose. One example of express preemption is the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which preempts state constitutions.

The Supremacy Clause also applies to treaties, which are regarded as equally "supreme law of the land" with "no superior efficacy ... given to either over the other". Treaties are incorporated into US federal law and are subject to judicial interpretation and review.

Frequently asked questions