State Vs Federal Law: Who Trumps Whom?

The United States has both federal and state governments, with the federal government having the final say in the law. This means that federal laws always prevail over state laws, as outlined in the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution. This clause ensures that federal statutes enacted by Congress are the supreme Law of the Land. While states have the authority to make their own laws, these cannot interfere with federal statutes. This has been the case in several instances, such as with federal immigration law and state laws regarding undocumented immigrants, and federal hazardous waste laws and state laws covering the same field. However, federal and state laws can interact in complicated ways, and there have been instances where state and federal laws have conflicted, such as with the legalisation of marijuana in some states despite it remaining illegal at the federal level.

The Supremacy Clause

In the United States, state and federal laws often interact in complicated ways. The US Constitution gives the federal government the final say in the law, and federal laws always prevail over state laws. This is known as the Supremacy Clause, which is found in Article VI of the Constitution. The Supremacy Clause was introduced as part of the New Jersey Plan in 1787 and was ratified in 1788.

Marijuana laws

In the United States, federal laws take precedence over state laws. This is due to the Supremacy Clause, found in Article VI of the Constitution, which ensures unity across the country. However, this does not mean that state laws must always align with federal statutes. For instance, states can choose to fund their governments through sales taxes instead of income taxes, and they can also choose to legalise marijuana, even though it is a federal crime.

The conflict between state and federal marijuana laws has also led to consumer confusion and uncertainty, with the market being saturated with hemp and CBD products that may not be allowed under federal law. In 2021, a group of US Senators proposed the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, which aimed to remove cannabis from the Controlled Substances Act and allow state-compliant marijuana businesses to access financial services.

While the federal government can enforce its own marijuana laws, requiring state agents to do so would be unconstitutional. The Tenth Amendment's "anti-commandeering rule" prohibits Congress from forcing states to enforce federal marijuana policies. This principle has been upheld by the US Supreme Court, which overturned a federal law prohibiting states from authorising sports gambling.

Civil rights laws

In the United States, federal laws prevail over state laws, as outlined in the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. This is to ensure unity across the country and to prevent confusion and unfairness that could result from different states having different laws.

Federal civil rights laws protect individuals from discrimination in various contexts, including employment, housing, and voting. These laws are in place at the federal, state, and local levels. The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause, which came into effect in 1868, states that no state can deny any person within its jurisdiction equal protection under the law.

There are several federal civil rights laws in place to protect individuals from discrimination. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a landmark federal law that prohibits discrimination based on race, colour, religion, gender, or national origin. It ended segregation in public places and banned the use of federal funds for discriminatory programs. The Act also includes sexual orientation and authorises the Department of Education to take steps towards desegregating schools. The Civil Rights Act of 1991 further amended this legislation to strengthen and improve federal civil rights laws.

The Rehabilitation Act of 1973 protects people with disabilities from discrimination by employers and organisations receiving federal financial aid. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) ensures that all children with disabilities have access to a free and appropriate public school education. The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) establishes procedures to increase voter registration, while the Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibits the denial or restriction of the right to vote and forbids discriminatory voting practices.

While federal civil rights laws provide a baseline of protection, states can strengthen these protections with their own laws. For example, state laws may include political affiliation or sexual orientation as additional protected characteristics. However, states cannot weaken federal civil rights protections. In cases where federal law does not have a specific provision, state legislation may offer a remedy for discrimination.

Environmental rules

In the United States, federal laws and state laws often interact in complex ways. The US Constitution gives the federal government the final say in the law, meaning that federal laws always prevail over state laws. This is known as the Supremacy Clause, which says that federal laws are the "supreme Law of the Land".

However, states can directly shape federal policy by choosing to enforce or not enforce environmental regulation. For example, federal regulation of nonpoint source water pollution is considered weak because localities lack the incentive to enforce federal regulations, and federal enforcers do not have the authority to countermand state decisions. In areas where the federal government cannot directly intervene, state and local governments have a strong hand in shaping the practical effect of federal regulation. States often serve as testing grounds for policies that may be adopted as federal law later.

In the absence of federal climate change regulation, states have brought public nuisance suits against carbon emitters and the EPA. States may spur federal action by bringing suit against emitters directly, such as when California sued General Motors, and several states sued power companies, both over carbon emissions. Federal regulation often acts as a signal to states, which may perceive this signal to mean more stringent regulation is necessary.

In some cases, states have more stringent environmental rules than federal rules. In these cases, states can enforce their laws as long as they do not go against federal regulations. For example, the EPA sets national standards for environmental protection, and states typically adopt a law that is at least as stringent as the federal one. The state law takes precedence over the federal one, as long as the state can assume primary responsibility for implementing and enforcing the law. The federal government, however, retains ultimate enforcement authority in all cases.

Immigration laws

State laws that tangentially affect immigration, such as employment licensing laws tied to compliance with federal immigration laws, are permissible. Additionally, states are permitted to help enforce federal immigration laws, such as by detaining immigrants previously convicted of felonies. However, there is contention and complexity in the interactions between state and federal immigration laws, with civil liberties groups and the federal government often challenging state immigration laws that are deemed discriminatory or unconstitutional.

For example, laws requiring proof of citizenship or legal residence, and directives that allow law enforcement to check the immigration status of individuals they deem suspicious, have been challenged as they can lead to racial profiling and violate the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The involvement of state and local police in enforcing immigration laws has also raised concerns about potential civil rights violations and the legality of prolonged detention of individuals solely based on their immigration status.

The differing immigration regulations between states can create inconsistencies and complexities, making it crucial for non-citizens to seek legal advice from qualified immigration lawyers to navigate the system effectively.

Frequently asked questions