Whistleblower Rights: Can The President Fire Them?

Whistleblowers are protected by law from retaliation, including termination, for their actions. In the United States, the Whistleblower Protection Act and state labor laws provide relief for employees who are fired for whistleblower activities. Despite these protections, the question of whether a president can fire a whistleblower has been a topic of legal debate, particularly in the case of Donald Trump's firing of Hampton Dellinger, the head of an independent US agency protecting government whistleblowers. While the Supreme Court and some justices have asserted the president's removal power, the specific circumstances and independence of Dellinger's role have led to legal challenges, with a federal judge ruling that Trump's actions were unlawful. This case highlights the complex interplay between presidential power and whistleblower protections, leaving room for further legal interpretation and debate.

Whistleblower Protection Acts

The Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) (5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(8)) protects federal employees or applicants for federal employment from retaliation for making protected disclosures. The WPA also provides penalties for supervisors who retaliate against whistleblowers. A disclosure is protected under the WPA if the employee discloses information that they reasonably believe to be evidence of wrongdoing. In general, a federal employee may make a protected disclosure to anyone, including non-governmental audiences, unless the information is classified or specifically prohibited by law from being released.

The WPA makes it unlawful for an employee’s (or applicant for employment) protected disclosure to influence the employer to take any retaliatory "personnel action" with respect to the employee. A personnel action is broadly defined to include factors such as ratings, details, promotions, demotions, termination, and access to training. Whistleblower protection laws prohibit all forms of retaliation against whistleblowers. Every government agency that accepts whistleblower complaints provides protection for the whistleblower, which includes a court order to restore the employee to their position or an equivalent position with the same amount of seniority.

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) enforces the law by holding those who do business with the federal government (contractors and subcontractors) responsible for complying with the legal requirement to take affirmative action and not discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, religion, national origin, disability, or status as a protected veteran. In addition, contractors and subcontractors are prohibited from discharging or otherwise discriminating against applicants or employees who inquire about, discuss, or disclose their compensation or that of others, subject to certain limitations.

The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) protects service members' reemployment rights when returning from a period of service in the uniformed services, including those called up from the reserves or National Guard, and prohibits employer discrimination based on military service or obligation.

The Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act of 2012 prohibits agencies from issuing or enforcing nondisclosure agreements, policies, or forms against current or former employees that do not contain a statement specifying that the provisions do not supersede, conflict with, or alter the employee's rights created by existing statutes or executive orders relating to classified information, communications to Congress, and reporting to an Inspector General or the Office of Special Counsel.

Retaliation against whistleblowers

Whistleblower protection laws prohibit all forms of retaliation against whistleblowers. These laws are enforced by the US Department of Labor, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), and the Office of Special Counsel (OSC).

Retaliation can take many forms, including firing or laying off, demoting, denying overtime or promotion, reducing pay or hours, reassignment to a less desirable position, or actions affecting prospects for promotion. Retaliation can also be more subtle, such as excluding employees from important meetings, which may not always be easy to recognize.

In California, personnel who participate in retaliation against whistleblowers can be sentenced to up to a year in jail and fines of up to $75,000. State law also entitles employees to file a civil lawsuit against employers who wrongfully terminate them, and a court may award back pay and punitive damages.

To prove retaliation, a whistleblower must show that their disclosure meets two criteria. Firstly, the disclosure must be based on a reasonable belief that wrongdoing has occurred. Secondly, the disclosure must be made to a person or entity authorized to receive it.

Whistleblowers who believe they have been retaliated against can contact the OIG's Whistleblower Protection Coordinator for additional information and to review their case. They may also consult the US Office of Special Counsel (OSC) or submit a complaint through the OIG Hotline.

Wrongful termination

In the United States, whistleblowers are protected from termination or other forms of retaliation by the federal Whistleblower Protection Act and state whistleblower protection laws. Despite these protections, whistleblowers often face wrongful termination, which is the most extreme form of whistleblower retaliation.

To prove wrongful termination, the whistleblower must establish a direct link between their whistleblowing activities and the adverse employment action. This can be challenging, as employers rarely provide explicit reasons for retaliation. However, circumstantial evidence, such as the timing of termination or other retaliatory actions, can be used to demonstrate causation.

State Whistleblower Protection Laws

In addition to federal protections, whistleblowers in California are protected by the California Whistleblower Protection Act and state labor laws. These laws prohibit retaliation against employees who report workplace violations or engage in whistleblowing activities. California law allows whistleblowers to file civil lawsuits against employers who wrongfully terminate them, and employers found guilty may be ordered to reinstate the employee and pay punitive damages.

Similarly, New Jersey, an "at-will" employment state, generally allows employers to terminate employees without legal consequences. However, there are exceptions for wrongful termination due to whistleblowing on illegal conduct or discrimination against a protected class.

Supreme Court Cases

In a notable case, the US Supreme Court temporarily blocked the firing of Hampton Dellinger, the head of a federal agency protecting government whistleblowers, during Donald Trump's second presidency. The court's unsigned order allowed Dellinger to remain in his position until a lower court's temporary protection expired, demonstrating the court's recognition of the importance of whistleblower protection.

In summary, wrongful termination of whistleblowers is illegal in the United States, and whistleblowers are protected by federal and state laws. While it can be challenging to prove wrongful termination, seeking legal assistance and understanding state-specific laws are crucial steps for whistleblowers experiencing retaliation.

Whistleblower immunity

Whistleblowers are protected by law from retaliation, including termination, for making a protected disclosure. These protections are provided by the Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) and exist at the federal level and in some states, including California. The WPA ensures that employees who engage in protected disclosures are free from fear of reprisal for their actions. Protected disclosures include reporting evidence of wrongdoing, waste, fraud, or abuse.

The WPA prohibits all forms of retaliation against whistleblowers, and any personnel actions taken against an employee because of their whistleblowing are unlawful. Whistleblowers can file a retaliation complaint if they believe they have been retaliated against. This can be done through the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) or the Office of Inspector General (OIG) Hotline. The OIG investigates complaints and can provide corrective action on behalf of the whistleblower.

In California, whistleblower protections are provided by the California Whistleblower Protection Act and labor laws. These laws prohibit retaliation against whistleblowers and impose penalties for those who participate in such actions. Personnel who engage in retaliation against whistleblowers can face jail time and fines. Additionally, employers may be required to reinstate terminated employees or pay back wages and punitive damages.

Despite these legal protections, whistleblowers often face negative consequences, including ostracization and wrongful termination. It is important for whistleblowers to seek legal advice and take protective actions to safeguard their rights and interests.

Whistleblower discrimination

In the United States, whistleblowers are protected from discrimination and retaliation under federal and state laws. The Whistleblower Protection Act, enforced by the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), safeguards federal employees from adverse consequences resulting from disclosing wrongdoing or misconduct within government agencies. The OSC's leader can only be removed by the president for "inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office."

State laws, such as the California Whistleblower Protection Act, also provide protections for whistleblowers. These laws prohibit retaliation against employees who report illegal or unethical activities and allow whistleblowers to take legal action against employers who wrongfully terminate or discriminate against them. In California, employers found guilty of retaliatory actions may face jail time, fines, and reinstatement of the terminated employee.

Despite these legal protections, whistleblowers often face ostracization and retaliation. It is recommended that whistleblowers seek legal counsel as soon as possible after facing adverse consequences to understand their rights and explore their legal options.

Frequently asked questions