Alabama's Abortion Law: Enforceable Or Not?

Alabama has some of the strictest anti-abortion laws in the US, with a history of legislation aimed at restricting access to abortion. In 2019, Alabama passed the Human Life Protection Act, banning most abortions at any stage of pregnancy, with no exceptions for rape or incest. The law only permits abortions if there is a serious health risk to the mother. In 2022, following the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Alabama began enforcing its total abortion ban. This ban includes prohibiting abortion providers from using telemedicine and restricting abortion care to licensed physicians. Alabama's Supreme Court has also ruled that frozen embryos used for in vitro fertilisation are considered children, impacting the availability of IVF services in the state. The state's anti-abortion stance has sparked boycotts and discussions around the Sanctity of Life amendment, with attempts to add exceptions to the abortion ban facing legal challenges.

Alabama's abortion ban has no exceptions for rape or incest

Alabama's abortion ban, the Human Life Protection Act, has been enforced since June 2022, following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. The Act prohibits abortion at all stages of pregnancy, with no exceptions for cases of rape or incest. The only limited exception is in cases that pose a "serious health risk" to the pregnant individual, but even this vague language offers little guidance to abortion providers on how to interpret the law.

The Alabama state legislature had previously tried and failed in 2015, 2016, and 2017 to pass a fetal heartbeat bill. In 2019, the state passed the Human Life Protection Act, which sought to ban most abortions at any stage of pregnancy. This law was granted an injunction until the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022, allowing the Act to take effect.

The abortion ban in Alabama has significant implications for reproductive rights and access to abortion care. The state already had a history of enacting restrictive abortion laws, such as requiring a mandatory 48-hour waiting period, biased counseling, and an ultrasound before obtaining an abortion. Alabama also prohibits public funding and private insurance coverage of abortion and requires parental, legal guardian, or judicial consent for a minor's abortion.

The impact of Alabama's abortion ban extends beyond its borders, as abortion rights activists who help people travel out of state for abortions could face legal consequences. The Alabama Attorney General, Steve Marshall, has suggested that assisting individuals in seeking abortions outside of the state could be considered a criminal conspiracy. This stance has raised concerns about the role of law enforcement and the potential for other states to follow suit, further restricting abortion access.

The ban has sparked debates and legal challenges, with abortion rights supporters arguing for the importance of accessible abortion care. Senate Bill 35, which seeks to add exceptions for rape and incest to Alabama's abortion ban, highlights the need for laws to consider the various personal and medical circumstances that pregnant individuals may face.

The ban only allows abortions if there is a serious health risk to the mother

Alabama's abortion laws have evolved from strict regulations in the late 19th and early 20th centuries to a period of liberalization following the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide. However, Alabama has consistently enacted legislation aimed at restricting access to abortion. In May 2019, Alabama passed one of the nation's most restrictive abortion laws, the Human Life Protection Act, which sought to ban most abortions at any stage of pregnancy, with no exceptions for cases of rape or incest.

The only circumstance under which an abortion is permitted is if there is a serious health risk to the mother. This exception is in line with federal law, which mandates that even in states with abortion bans, physicians must provide the procedure if it is required to stabilize a woman's health. However, this exception has been deemed ineffective in practice, as physicians face the risk of prosecution, prison time, monetary fines, and loss of their professional licenses if they provide abortion care to preserve the health of a pregnant patient. The vague language of the law leaves doctors unsure of how to follow it, and they may be reluctant to provide abortion care until a patient's condition deteriorates to the point where the narrow exception is clearly applicable.

The Alabama law states that abortions are prohibited when the probable post-fertilization age of the unborn child is 20 or more weeks, unless, in reasonable medical judgment, the woman has a condition that necessitates the abortion to avert her death or serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function. This exception does not include psychological or emotional conditions, and it specifically states that no such condition shall be deemed to exist if it is based on a claim or diagnosis that the woman intends to engage in conduct that could result in her death or substantial impairment.

The exception for a serious health risk to the mother is not unique to Alabama, as all state abortion bans currently in effect contain exceptions to prevent the death or preserve the life of the pregnant person. However, the specifics of these exceptions vary significantly from state to state, and many states with health exceptions limit them to physical health conditions, excluding mental or emotional health. Alabama is the only state that includes mental health concerns in its health exception, but it requires a psychiatrist to diagnose the pregnant person with a "serious mental illness" and document that it is likely the person will engage in behavior that could result in their death or the death of the fetus due to their mental health condition. The law does not define "serious mental illness" and does not allow physicians to determine what mental illnesses qualify for the exception.

Alabama's abortion laws have evolved from strict regulations in the 19th and 20th centuries

The state's abortion laws have also been influenced by the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions. In 1973, the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade ruling meant Alabama could no longer regulate abortion in the first trimester. However, Alabama retained targeted regulation of abortion providers (TRAP) laws and continued to restrict the provision of abortion care to licensed physicians. The state also prohibited public funding and private insurance coverage of abortion.

In 2016, Alabama banned dilation & evacuation (D&E), the most common abortion procedure used in the second trimester. This legislation was later ruled unconstitutional and blocked from enforcement by the Eleventh Circuit Court in 2018. Despite this, Alabama continued to pass laws restricting abortion access, including a fetal heartbeat bill in 2017 and a mandatory 48-hour waiting period, biased counseling, and an ultrasound requirement in 2018.

In 2022, following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Alabama began enforcing its total abortion ban, prohibiting abortion at all stages of pregnancy. This ban includes exceptions only in cases of medical emergency, where there is a serious health risk to the mother. Alabama's abortion laws have evolved from strict regulations in the past to a period of liberalization following the Roe v. Wade decision, and now back to strict regulations with the recent total abortion ban.

The state's abortion restrictions particularly impact marginalised communities

Alabama's abortion restrictions have a particularly detrimental impact on marginalised communities. The state's abortion laws disproportionately affect people of colour, immigrants, low-income communities, trans and non-binary people, adolescents, and people with disabilities.

Firstly, the restrictions adversely affect people of colour. According to Penn sociologist Courtney Boen, the lack of access to safe abortions for marginalised groups will have far-reaching consequences beyond the immediate inability to terminate a pregnancy. Carrying a pregnancy to term can put the pregnant person's life at risk, disrupt their educational plans, and alter their career trajectory, exacerbating existing disadvantages for already marginalised communities. Statistics show that Black women between the ages of 15 and 44 obtain abortions at a higher rate than their Hispanic and white counterparts. Furthermore, the maternal mortality rate for Black women is 2.9 times higher than that of white women, highlighting the racial disparities in reproductive health outcomes.

Secondly, Alabama's restrictions create barriers for low-income individuals and families. The financial burden of seeking abortion services, including the cost of the procedure, travel expenses, and potential loss of income due to time off work, disproportionately impacts those with limited financial resources. The increased economic strain may push individuals and families further into poverty, exacerbating existing inequalities.

Thirdly, the state's laws also negatively affect immigrants, particularly those without documentation. They face the dual challenge of navigating immigration enforcement and abortion restrictions, which may effectively prevent them from obtaining abortions, even if they travel out of state.

Additionally, Alabama's abortion restrictions impact adolescents seeking abortions. Parental involvement laws in the state require consent from a parent or guardian for minors to obtain abortions, creating a barrier for young people who may not have supportive families or who fear repercussions from disclosing their situation.

Furthermore, the restrictions have implications for trans and non-binary individuals. According to a study by the Guttmacher Institute, an estimated 462 to 530 trans and non-binary people received abortion care in 2017. However, the actual number may be higher due to a lack of data collection on patients' gender identities at abortion-providing clinics. Limiting abortion access disproportionately affects these communities, as they are more likely to experience economic hardship and face additional obstacles in obtaining healthcare.

Finally, people with disabilities are also particularly impacted by the state's abortion restrictions. They may encounter compounding obstacles to accessing abortion care, further marginalising an already vulnerable population.

Alabama's abortion ban has implications for IVF treatments and frozen embryos

Alabama's abortion ban, enforced in June 2022 after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, prohibits abortion at all stages of pregnancy. The state's abortion law has evolved from strict regulations in the 19th and 20th centuries to a period of liberalization following the Roe v. Wade ruling in 1973.

In February 2024, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos used for in vitro fertilization (IVF) should be considered children under Alabama's Wrongful Death of a Minor Act. This decision led to several IVF clinics in the state halting IVF treatments, leaving prospective parents in limbo. The ruling raises questions about the status of frozen embryos, including their destruction and the implications for pre-implantation genetic testing.

The Alabama senator who sponsored the abortion ban stated that the use of the phrase "in utero" was deliberate to clarify that the law did not intend to interfere with IVF. However, the implications of the Alabama Supreme Court's ruling on frozen embryos have sparked concerns about the future of IVF treatments in the state. The political fallout was swift, with the Alabama state legislature passing bills to preserve IVF treatment within three weeks of the ruling.

The debate around the status of frozen embryos and IVF treatments intersects with broader discussions on abortion and reproductive technology. The anti-abortion movement may find itself in a complicated position, as abortion terminates pregnancy while IVF is a procedure that creates pregnancy. The Alabama Supreme Court's ruling on frozen embryos highlights the exceptionalism of IVF and its treatment compared to abortion, despite both involving reproductive decision-making.

While the Alabama Supreme Court's ruling on frozen embryos has direct implications for IVF treatments and frozen embryos, the state's abortion ban itself does not explicitly mention IVF. The future of IVF in Alabama remains uncertain, and the issue may be left to the state legislature to determine how to regulate IVF and manage frozen embryos.

Frequently asked questions