Owner-Employee: Understanding Common Law Employment

The classification of workers as either employees or independent contractors is important for tax purposes. A common-law employee is typically not the business owner or their spouse. Common-law employees are distinguished from independent contractors by the degree of control exerted by the employer over the work performed, the type of relationship, and financial aspects. The IRS uses a common-law test to determine the worker's employment status, which is important for health insurance and tax purposes.

Common law control test

The Common Law Control Test is one of several common law tests used to determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. It is a guide used by the IRS to determine a worker's status. The test considers all information providing evidence of the degree of control and independence between an employer and a worker.

The common law test indicates that a worker is likely an employee if the employer has behavioural control—that is, control over what work is to be done and how it is to be done. When employers can only direct or control the result of the work done and not what will be done and how it will be done, then a worker is typically defined as an independent contractor.

The common law control test also considers other factors that may indicate self-employment status, including:

• Being hired to complete a certain job and being liable for damages if the worker quits before the job is completed
• Working for multiple persons or firms at the same time
• Advertising to the general public that they are available to perform services
• Paying their own expenses and providing their own equipment and workplace

Worker classification is an important area for business owners as misclassifying workers may result in IRS-imposed financial penalties. It is also important for insurance and tax purposes. For instance, with an employee classification, the employer must withhold two key payroll taxes: Social Security and Medicare.

Common law employee vs. independent contractor

A common law employee is different from an independent contractor in several ways. A common law employee is hired to complete a specific job and may be liable for damages if they quit before the job is finished. They work for a single employer and are subject to the direction and control of their employer, including the right of the employer to control the end result and the details of when, where, and how the work is done. They are integrated into the firm's operations, and the firm's success depends on their services. They do not pay their own expenses and do not usually provide their own equipment or workplace. They are also not permitted to delegate work to others.

On the other hand, an independent contractor has more control over their work and is self-employed. They use their own methods and do not receive training from the client. Their services are usually separate from the client's business and are not integrated into its operations. They pay their own expenses and provide their equipment and workplace. They are responsible for obtaining and maintaining the tools they need to do their work. They can also assign another person to do the job in their place.

The distinction between a common law employee and an independent contractor is important for tax purposes. Businesses must withhold and deposit income taxes, Social Security taxes, and Medicare taxes from the wages paid to employees. They must also pay the employer portion of Social Security and Medicare taxes, as well as unemployment tax on wages paid to employees. On the other hand, businesses generally do not have to withhold or pay any taxes on payments to independent contractors.

To determine whether a worker is a common law employee or an independent contractor, the IRS uses a common-law test that examines the type of relationship, behavioural factors, and financial factors. The key factor is the extent of the right of the employer to direct and control the worker. However, there is no set number of factors that determine whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor, and the specific factors considered may vary depending on the situation.

Common law employee benefits

A common-law employee is an individual who performs services for an organisation or individual and is subject to the organisation's or individual's control in terms of what will be done and how it will be done. This control by the employer is the defining feature of the employer-employee relationship, regardless of whether the employee works full-time or part-time.

Common law employees differ from independent contractors in that the latter have more control over their work and are self-employed. Common law employees, on the other hand, have a more structured work schedule and are answerable to the business management team.

Determining whether an individual is a common-law employee or an independent contractor is crucial for small business owners, especially when it comes to health insurance plans. In most cases, a group health insurance plan requires at least one common-law employee. This means that a business owner cannot be a common-law employee of their own company, nor can their spouse.

To establish whether an individual is a common-law employee, the IRS uses a test that examines various factors falling into three categories: the type of relationship, behavioural, and financial. This helps determine the degree of control and independence in the relationship.

Some examples of common-law employees include a salesperson employed by an auto dealer and an appraiser employed by a tax-exempt museum. These employees work a set number of days per week, are assigned specific tasks, and their work is subject to approval by a manager or curator. They may also receive additional benefits such as health insurance and group-term life insurance provided by their employer.

Common law employee tax payments

A common-law employee is an individual who performs services for an employer, with the employer having the right to control what will be done and how it will be done. The employer-employee relationship is governed by the substance of the relationship, not the label, and the degree of control and independence must be considered when determining whether an individual is an employee or an independent contractor.

When it comes to tax payments, common-law employers are responsible for withholding and paying Medicare and Social Security taxes, as well as unemployment insurance on wages paid to common-law employees. Employers must also withhold and deposit income taxes from the wages paid to these employees. Additionally, employers must pay the matching employer portion of Social Security and Medicare taxes, as well as unemployment tax on wages.

On the other hand, independent contractors are typically responsible for their own taxes. Business owners who hire independent contractors generally do not have to withhold or pay any taxes on payments made to them. However, if an employer incorrectly classifies an employee as an independent contractor, they may be held liable for employment taxes for that worker. In such cases, the employer may be required to pay the employee's share of uncollected Social Security and Medicare taxes.

To determine whether an individual is a common-law employee or an independent contractor, the IRS considers the overall relationship with the worker and the right to control the work performed. Factors such as payment structure, work schedule, restrictions on working for others, and the provision of training and instructions are considered.

It is important to note that the determination of the employer can have significant tax consequences, especially when multiple entities have a relationship with the worker. The common-law employer is ultimately responsible for employment taxes, reporting requirements, and various tax deductions and exclusions related to their common-law employees.

Common law employee insurance plans

Common law employees are classified as individuals who perform services for an employer and are subject to the employer's control over what work will be done and how it will be executed. This classification is distinct from independent contractors, who have greater autonomy and independence in their work.

When it comes to insurance plans, understanding the distinction between common law employees and independent contractors is crucial for business owners. In the context of health insurance, a common law employee is typically not the business owner or their spouse. Instead, they are individuals who meet the criteria established by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for employment status. This distinction is essential when determining eligibility for group health insurance plans.

To qualify for a group health insurance plan, a business typically needs at least one common law employee. The number of employees required may vary depending on the specific plan. When calculating the total number of full-time common law employees, businesses can often combine the hours of part-time employees to meet the threshold. This calculation is particularly relevant when determining eligibility for small business health insurance plans.

It is important to note that different insurance providers may use varying terminology and rules to define employees. Therefore, business owners should carefully review the specific requirements of their chosen insurance plan. By understanding the definition of a common law employee and the applicable IRS guidelines, business owners can make informed decisions about their insurance plans and ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

In addition to health insurance, business owners may also consider offering legal insurance as a voluntary benefit to their common law employees. Legal insurance provides employees with access to a network of attorneys and legal services at a low cost, typically around $20 per month. This benefit can help employees navigate legal matters, create essential documents, and protect their interests. By offering legal insurance, employers can address a common need among their workforce and provide valuable support beyond traditional core benefits.

Frequently asked questions