City Ordinances: Overriding State Law?

The question of whether a city ordinance can supersede state law is a complex one. In the United States, federal preemption is a well-known concept, grounded in the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which states that federal law supersedes conflicting state law. However, in recent years, state preemption has also gained prominence, allowing state governments to nullify local laws that conflict with or deviate from state law. This has led to situations where local anti-abortion ordinances have been enacted in cities within states where abortion is legal, as well as disputes over gun laws and the handling of fetal remains. Ultimately, the power dynamics between state and local laws are a contested issue in the U.S. legal system, with the potential for significant implications in various policy areas.

Abortion laws

In the United States, federal preemption is a legal principle that federal law supersedes conflicting state law. This is grounded in the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In recent years, state preemption has also become prominent, allowing state governments to nullify local laws that conflict with or deviate from state law.

In some cases, local anti-abortion ordinances have been struck down by state courts. For example, in Delaware, a local anti-abortion ordinance was overturned by a state court, highlighting the conflict between state and local laws. Generally, if there is a conflict between state and local laws, state laws override municipal ordinances.

The power dynamics between state and local laws have significant implications for abortion access and rights. The ability of states to nullify local laws that conflict with state law can impact the availability of abortion services and the ability of individuals to make their own reproductive choices. It is important to note that the legal landscape surrounding abortion is complex and ever-evolving, with ongoing debates and court rulings shaping the rights and access to abortion across the United States.

Federal preemption

In the U.S., there is a clear hierarchy of laws, with federal law at the top, followed by state law, and then municipal law. This means that, generally, state law will override municipal ordinances in the case of a conflict. For example, in State ex rel. Jennings v. City of Seaford, the court held that an ordinance requiring the cremation or interment of fetal remains was preempted and invalid because it conflicted with state law.

However, there are exceptions to this rule. Special districts, such as counties, can function autonomously and have their own legal authority. Additionally, territories like Puerto Rico and Guam have some powers, such as taxation and laws governing criminal and civil matters, although they do not have the same voting power in Congress.

The issue of preemption, whether federal or state, is a complex and often-overlooked legal issue. It raises questions about the balance of power between different levels of government and the protection of individual rights.

State preemption

In recent years, state preemption has become increasingly prominent, with several states enacting local anti-abortion ordinances that conflict with state law. For example, in November, a city in New Mexico—a state where abortion is legal—enacted an ordinance blocking abortion clinics from operating. Similar ordinances have been enacted in Texas, Ohio, and Nebraska, and proposed in California and Colorado.

The power of state preemption was affirmed in the case of *State ex rel. Jennings v. City of Seaford*, where the court held that a local ordinance requiring the cremation or interment of fetal remains resulting from abortion or miscarriage was preempted and invalid because it conflicted with state law. The court affirmed that "a junior sovereign cannot enact a law that conflicts directly with a law established by the senior sovereign".

While state preemption allows states to override local laws, it is important to note that federal preemption, grounded in the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution, takes precedence over both state and local laws. Federal preemption stands for the principle that federal law supersedes conflicting state or local laws.

Local courts

In the United States, there are also special districts that can function autonomously. The Census Bureau recognises special districts as separate entities from the local or municipal government. Their legal authority allows them to provide services for a designated area.

However, in the case of a conflict between state and local laws, state laws generally override municipal ordinances. This is known as preemption, and it can occur at the federal or state level. Federal preemption is grounded in the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which states that federal law supersedes conflicting state law. State preemption allows a state government to nullify a local law that conflicts with or deviates from state law.

For example, in November, a city in New Mexico enacted an ordinance blocking abortion clinics from operating, despite abortion being legal in the state. This ordinance was later struck down by a state court. In another case, the court held that an ordinance requiring the cremation or interment of fetal remains resulting from abortion or miscarriage was preempted and invalid because it conflicted with state law.

Special districts

In the US, state law generally overrides municipal ordinances. This is known as state preemption, and it allows state governments to nullify local laws that conflict with or deviate from state law. However, there are special districts that can function autonomously. The Census Bureau recognises special districts as separate entities from local or municipal governments. Their legal authority allows them to provide services for a designated area, and some districts may serve multiple states if there is an interstate contract.

Local disputes within special districts can involve different types of legal issues, including zoning, taxation, criminal and civil courts, and business law. The power of territories outside the 50 states, such as Puerto Rico and Guam, is likely to evolve over time.

Frequently asked questions