Civil Law Retroactivity: Exploring Legal Boundaries

Civil law generally cannot be applied retroactively, as this could be unjust and oppressive. However, there are exceptions to this rule. For example, in the Philippines, retroactive application is allowed in certain circumstances, such as for family, property, and social justice-oriented laws. In addition, laws can be applied retroactively if they are curative statutes, passed to validate previous legal proceedings or rights that were otherwise invalid.

When can civil law be retroactive?

Civil law can be retroactive in certain circumstances. As a general rule, laws are not retroactive and must not be applied to pending disputes and cases. However, there are exceptions to this rule. For example, if the law itself provides for retroactivity, or if the law is remedial in nature, or if the statute is penal in nature but favourable to the accused or convict. In the Philippines, retroactive application primarily applies to family, property, and certain social justice-oriented laws. The Supreme Court of the Philippines plays a crucial role in interpreting the retroactive effect of laws, balancing legislative intent, principles of fairness, and the interests of justice.

What is the Code Civil?

Civil law can be retroactive in certain circumstances. The Code Civil, or French Napoleonic Code, does not have the status of constitutional legislation and can be overruled by subsequent laws. However, the Conseil Constitutionnel has determined that retroactive laws can be passed within certain limits. In the Philippines, retroactive application is an exception rather than a rule and requires clear legislative intent or necessary inference from the law's nature.

The Code Civil is a civil code, which is a codification of private law relating to property, family, and obligations. It was enacted in 1804 and introduced in many countries standing under French occupation during the Napoleonic Wars, including Italy, the Benelux countries, Spain, Portugal, Latin America, Quebec in Canada, and all other former French colonies. The Code Civil is organised similarly to many other civil codes, and many of its provisions are codifications of well-established common law principles.

A civil code sets out the organising concepts, transcendent principles, directory rules and animating ideals of a legal tradition in a non-technical style and vocabulary. Unlike an administrative code, criminal code or code of civil procedure, a civil code expounds only on matters of private law. This includes the legal attributes of the human person, such as name, domicile and age of majority, as well as the key elements of an individual's relationships with others, such as marriage, filiation, parental authority and support obligations. It also covers an individual's relationship with property, including ownership, possession, accession and prescription, and the main legal institutions within which these relationships must or may be pursued, such as successions, gifts, wills, contracts, delicts, sales, leases, mandates, partnerships and hypothecs.

How does the Supreme Court of the Philippines interpret retroactive law?

In the Philippines, retroactive application is an exception rather than a rule. The Supreme Court of the Philippines plays a crucial role in interpreting the retroactive effect of laws, balancing legislative intent, principles of fairness, and the interests of justice.

The Court has ruled that the Family Code can be applied retroactively, citing Article 256, which states that the Family Code "shall have retroactive effect insofar as it does not prejudice or impair vested or acquired rights in accordance with the Civil Code or other laws".

The Court has also clarified that while a law creating new rights may be given retroactive effect, this can only be done if the new right does not prejudice or impair any vested rights. This is in line with the general rule that laws should not be applied retroactively to unsettle vested rights or disturb the legal effect of prior transactions.

In addition, the Court has ruled that procedural rules will be construed as applicable to causes of action accrued, and actions pending and undetermined, at the time of their passage, unless such actions are expressly excepted or vested rights would be disturbed by giving them a retroactive application.

What are the limits of retroactive law?

Retroactive law is generally considered unjust and oppressive, as it can be used to punish individuals for violations of laws not yet enacted, unsettle vested rights or disturb the legal effect of prior transactions.

In the Philippines, Article 4 of the Civil Code states that "Laws shall have no retroactive effect unless the contrary is provided". However, there are specific instances where laws may be applied retroactively by way of exception. This retroactive application must be clearly intended by the law itself or inferred from its nature and objectives. For example, curative statutes are legislative acts passed to validate previous legal proceedings or rights that were otherwise invalid.

Retroactive laws can also be passed in the Code Civil, as it does not have the status of constitutional legislation and can be overruled by subsequent laws. However, this is only possible within certain limits.

In general, laws cannot be retroactively applied if doing so would violate constitutional rights, such as due process or equal protection clauses.

What are the exceptions to retroactive law?

Retroactive laws are generally considered unjust and oppressive, as they can be used to punish individuals for violations of laws that were not in place at the time of their actions. However, there are exceptions to this rule.

In the Philippines, retroactive application is an exception rather than a rule and requires clear legislative intent or necessary inference from the law's nature. This primarily applies to family, property, and certain social justice-oriented laws.

Retroactive laws can also be passed if they are remedial in nature, as there are no vested rights in rules of procedure. Additionally, if a statute is penal in nature, it can be applied retroactively, provided it is favourable to the accused or convict and they are not a habitual delinquent.

Another exception is curative statutes, which are legislative acts passed to validate previous legal proceedings or rights that were otherwise invalid. These laws aim to remedy defects in prior proceedings or cure situations that arose due to technicalities or procedural errors.

It's important to note that retroactive laws cannot be applied if doing so would violate constitutional rights, such as due process or equal protection clauses.

Frequently asked questions