Congress' Power: Laws Targeting Individuals?

The United States Constitution prohibits the federal government from enacting bills of attainder, which are laws that impose punishment on a specific individual or group without a trial. While Congress can exercise its legislative authority over a specified individual or group, it must be careful not to raise constitutional concerns. The Supreme Court has articulated a test for determining whether a law is a bill of attainder, considering the historical, functional, and motivational aspects of the legislation. The Court has emphasized that legislation does not violate the Bill of Attainder Clause simply by placing legal burdens on specific individuals or groups, but rather, it must also inflict punishment. This ensures that Congress does not usurp the power of the judicial branch.

The US Constitution prohibits bills of attainder, or laws that punish individuals without trial

The US Constitution prohibits bills of attainder, or laws that punish individuals or groups without a trial. This is based on the principle of the separation of powers, which aims to prevent Congress from usurping the power of the judicial branch.

The Supreme Court has interpreted the Constitution's protection against bills of attainder to include not only legislation imposing a death sentence but also other forms of punishment on specific persons or groups without a trial. This means that Congress cannot pass laws that legislatively determine guilt and inflict punishment on identifiable individuals or groups without providing the protections of a judicial trial.

The Court has laid out three tests for assessing whether a law imposes punishment: the historical test, the functional test, and the motivational test. The historical test considers the history of bills of attainder to determine if the law in question is similar to past legislation deemed to be a bill of attainder. The functional test examines the type and severity of burdens imposed by the law, while the motivational test considers the legislative history to evaluate whether the legislation is intended to be punitive.

While the Constitution prohibits bills of attainder, there have been instances where Congress has passed legislation that raised concerns about targeting specific individuals or groups. For example, in response to allegations of election law violations by the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN), Congress passed several appropriations bills that limited the provision of federal funds to ACORN and its affiliates. The courts will consider the legislative history and the specific individuals or groups affected by the statute when evaluating whether a law is a bill of attainder.

Congress may pass laws targeting a legitimate class of one

The United States Constitution prohibits the federal government from enacting bills of attainder, which are laws that impose punishment on an individual or group without a trial. However, Congress may pass laws targeting a "legitimate class of one". This concept emerged from two cases: one regarding the Exxon Valdez oil spill, and the other concerning the preservation of President Nixon's historical documents. In both cases, the need for Congress to act swiftly allowed them to pass legislation establishing a "legitimate class of one".

The Supreme Court has articulated a three-part test to determine whether a law is a bill of attainder: the historical, functional, and motivational tests. The historical test examines the infamous history of bills of attainder, including pre-Founding legislation that imposed death sentences, imprisonment, banishment, and employment bans. The functional test considers the type and severity of burdens imposed by the law and whether they can be said to further non-punitive legislative purposes. The motivational test is not entirely clear, but it seems to involve examining the legislative history of a provision to evaluate whether it is intended to be punitive.

The Court has emphasised that a law does not violate the Bill of Attainder Clause simply because it places legal burdens on a specific individual or group. Instead, a bill of attainder must also inflict punishment. This punishment can include confiscating an individual's property or imposing other forms of punishment without a trial.

While Congress may pass laws targeting a "legitimate class of one", it must be careful not to overstep its legislative authority and infringe on the powers of the judicial branch. The open and full discussion provided for under the Constitution allows for the improvement of bills through amendments before they become law, helping to address any potential constitutional concerns.

Congress can be influenced by the President to pass laws

While the President of the United States cannot make laws, they can influence Congress to pass laws. The US Constitution provides that all legislative powers are vested in a Congress of the United States, which consists of a Senate and a House of Representatives. The President, however, can make suggestions about things that should be new laws.

One way the President can do this is through "executive communication". This involves a message or letter from a member of the President's Cabinet, the head of an independent agency, or the President themselves, transmitting a draft of a proposed bill to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President of the Senate. State legislatures can also "memorialize" Congress to enact specified federal laws by passing resolutions to be transmitted to the House and Senate. A Member of Congress may then introduce the proposal as submitted or redraft it. In either case, the Member may consult with the Legislative Counsel of the House or the Senate to frame the ideas in suitable legislative language and form.

The President can also influence Congress by vetoing a bill. If the President chooses to veto a bill, Congress can, in most cases, vote to override that veto, and the bill becomes a law. However, if the President does not sign off on a bill and it remains unsigned when Congress is no longer in session, the bill will be vetoed by default, in what is called a "pocket veto", and cannot be overridden by Congress.

It is important to note that there are constitutional concerns when Congress proposes or passes legislation that imposes a burden on a specified individual, entity, or identifiable group. The US Constitution expressly prohibits the federal government from enacting bills of attainder, or "a law that legislatively determines guilt and inflicts punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial".

Congress can also be influenced by state legislatures to pass laws

Congress is the lawmaking branch of the federal government. While the majority of laws originate in the House of Representatives, all legislative powers are vested in the Congress of the United States, which consists of the Senate and the House of Representatives. The Senate is composed of 100 members, two from each state, elected by the people.

State legislatures can influence Congress to pass laws by "memorializing" Congress to enact specified federal laws. They do this by passing resolutions to be transmitted to the House and the Senate as memorials. If a member of Congress is favorably impressed by the idea, they may introduce the proposal as it has been submitted or may redraft it. In any case, a member of Congress may consult with the Legislative Counsel of the House or the Senate to frame the ideas in suitable legislative language and form.

State legislatures actively craft and enact laws that govern their respective states, playing a vital role in the democratic process. They can also influence Congress through lobbying, which is pivotal to the destiny of a bill and exerts influence throughout multiple stages of the legislative process. Lobbyists supply lawmakers with critical information and expertise, helping them make informed decisions. They also formulate bills, suggest amendments, and cultivate robust support among legislators.

It is important to note that a proposal cannot become a law without consideration and approval by both Houses of Congress. Once a bill is introduced, it is assigned to a committee whose members will research, discuss, and make changes to the bill. If the bill passes one body of Congress, it goes to the other body to go through a similar process of research, discussion, changes, and voting. Once both bodies vote to accept a bill, they must work out any differences between the two versions. Then both chambers vote on the same version of the bill. If it passes, they present it to the president for approval or veto.

A bill must be passed by both Houses of Congress to become law

For a bill to become law, it must be passed by both Houses of Congress. This is a key feature of the bicameral legislative system in the United States, which ensures that a proposal cannot become law without the consideration and approval of both the Senate and the House of Representatives.

The process of passing a bill begins with the introduction of a proposal by a member of Congress. This proposal is then referred to a committee for consideration and may be drafted or redrafted with the help of the Legislative Counsel of the House or the Senate. The bill is then reported back to the House or Senate, where it is discussed and may be amended before being put to a vote. If the bill passes this vote, it is sent to the other House of Congress, where the process is repeated.

During this process, it is possible for a bill to be corrected or amended, even after it has passed one House of Congress. This can be done by specifying the changes or additions to be made and requesting the other House to make them, or by requesting the return of the bill to the originating House. If a bill has been presented to the President but not yet acted upon, a concurrent resolution can be passed to request its return for correction. However, if the President has approved the bill, it has become law, and any amendments must be made through the passage of another bill.

While Congress has the authority to pass laws that target specific individuals, entities, or groups, there are constitutional limitations in place. The United States Constitution expressly prohibits the passing of bills of attainder, which are defined as laws that "legislatively determine guilt and inflict punishment upon an identifiable individual without provision of the protections of a judicial trial". The Supreme Court has further clarified that a bill of attainder must meet two criteria: it must apply with specificity, and it must impose punishment without a trial. This prohibition is based on the principle of the separation of powers, as it prevents Congress from usurping the power of the judicial branch.

Frequently asked questions