Lawsuits Between Daughters-In-Law And Mothers-In-Law: Is It Possible?

In India, a daughter-in-law can file a case against her mother-in-law under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, if she is facing domestic, matrimonial, or dowry-related violence. However, it is important to note that the law does not exclusively protect women who are in a matrimonial alliance with a man. In the case of Versha Kapoor vs Union of India, the Supreme Court held that a mother-in-law could seek a protection order under the DV Act against her daughter-in-law if the latter was causing matrimonial cruelty. On the other hand, a mother-in-law can also file a case against her daughter-in-law for criminal intimidation, harassment, and assault, as well as seek an injunction to restrain the daughter-in-law from entering her property.

Criminal intimidation

In India, a mother-in-law can file a case of criminal intimidation against her daughter-in-law. To do so, it is advisable that the mother-in-law records any threats or incidents of abuse and files a police complaint, citing specific examples of intimidation in her complaint.

In addition to filing a criminal intimidation case, a mother-in-law can also seek an order of protection against her daughter-in-law for physical cruelty. This is known as a DV (domestic violence) case, and it is possible to obtain a restraining order to prevent the daughter-in-law from entering the family home.

It is important to note that a mother-in-law cannot sue her daughter-in-law under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. This law can only be invoked by a woman against her husband or in-laws, and not against her daughter-in-law. However, in the case of Versha Kapoor vs Union of India, the Supreme Court held that a mother-in-law can seek a protection order under the DV Act if her daughter-in-law has made the lives of her in-laws miserable through "matrimonial cruelty".

To ensure the safety of the mother-in-law, it is recommended that she records any conversations or interactions that may serve as evidence of criminal intimidation or cruelty. Additionally, involving relatives or elders to mediate the situation and encourage the daughter-in-law to change her behaviour may be beneficial.

Monetary demands

In certain countries, a daughter-in-law can file a monetary case against her mother-in-law. In India, for instance, a daughter-in-law is protected under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which gives her the right to reside in a "shared household" or "matrimonial household" during and after domestic violence proceedings. This right to residence may come into conflict with the rights of parents-in-law, who are protected under the Senior Citizens Act and may seek to evict their daughter-in-law from their property.

In a specific case, a daughter-in-law has posed monetary demands to her in-laws, threatening to have them arrested under the dowry act. The mother-in-law can file a police complaint against her daughter-in-law for criminal intimidation and obtain a protection order. It is advisable to record any threats or abuses as evidence to support the complaint. Additionally, the mother-in-law can involve relatives or elders to intervene and resolve the issue amicably before taking legal action.

If the daughter-in-law files any false charges, the court will provide an opportunity for the mother-in-law to contest the claims and prove their innocence. The court will not automatically accept the daughter-in-law's claims as truth, and the mother-in-law may seek bail to avoid arrest. It is important to note that the court will determine the truthfulness of the allegations during the trial.

To summarize, while a daughter-in-law can make monetary demands, the mother-in-law has legal options to protect herself and her family. This includes filing a case of criminal intimidation, seeking a protection order, and involving relatives or elders to resolve the dispute amicably.

Physical cruelty

In India, a mother-in-law can file a complaint under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act) against her daughter-in-law for acts of domestic violence and physical cruelty.

In the case of Versha Kapoor vs Union of India, the Supreme Court held that a mother-in-law can seek a protection order under the DV Act against her daughter-in-law if the latter made life miserable for her in-laws. This would constitute "matrimonial cruelty" and could be grounds for divorce.

In another case, Anresh Kumar vs State of Bihar 2014, the court ruled that no arrest could be made in a dowry case based solely on the filing of a First Information Report (FIR). However, after the investigation, if credible evidence is found, the court has the power to issue an arrest order.

It is important to note that the DV Act aims to protect women from domestic violence and does not confer a right on a mother-in-law to prosecute the father and brother of her daughter-in-law under the same Act. This was clarified by the Bombay High Court, which maintained that a mother-in-law's complaint against her daughter-in-law under the DV Act is valid, but quashed the complaint against the daughter-in-law's father and brother.

To file a case of physical cruelty, the mother-in-law should record and document any threats, abuse, or ill deeds by her daughter-in-law. She can then file a complaint of criminal intimidation and seek a protection order or restraining order against her daughter-in-law. It is advisable to consult a qualified lawyer before taking legal action, as there may be counterclaims of false dowry or domestic violence allegations by the daughter-in-law.

Domestic violence

In India, a daughter-in-law is protected under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, which gives her the right to reside in a 'shared household' or matrimonial household during and after domestic violence proceedings. This right, however, may conflict with the rights of the parents-in-law to evict the daughter-in-law from their property under the Senior Citizens Act. While the law provides some safeguards for daughters-in-law, there is a need for clearer guidelines and amendments to harmonise the two acts and ensure consistent judgments that serve justice to all parties involved.

In terms of filing a case against her mother-in-law, a daughter-in-law can invoke the domestic violence law against her husband and in-laws. However, a mother-in-law cannot invoke this law against her daughter-in-law or sister-in-law. This is to ensure that the right of one woman is not upheld at the cost of another. While there have been attempts to challenge this in court, the government has maintained its stance.

To address this, legislative and legal discourses must evolve to effectively conceptualise and address mother-in-law violence against daughters-in-law. This includes recognising the influence of cultural and social norms on the implementation and interpretation of domestic violence laws. By doing so, the Indian justice system can better serve the needs of women facing domestic violence within the complex dynamics of marital households.

False charges

In India, a daughter-in-law has the right to reside in a 'shared household' during and after domestic violence proceedings, according to the Domestic Violence Act, 2005. However, this right is often in conflict with the rights of parents-in-law under the Senior Citizens Act, leading to inconsistent judgments and a lack of clarity.

Now, coming to the specific scenario of false charges, it is important to understand that the court system in India does not blindly accept the claims made by a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law. Here are some key points to consider:

• Right to Defend and Prove Innocence: If a daughter-in-law files false charges, the mother-in-law has the full opportunity to contest these claims in court and prove her innocence. The court will not take the accusations at face value and will require evidence and a strong case to convict someone.
• Seeking Bail: To avoid potential incarceration, the mother-in-law can apply for bail. This is a preventive measure to ensure that false charges do not lead to immediate imprisonment.
• Counter-Filing and Protection Orders: In response to false charges, the mother-in-law can file a case of criminal intimidation against her daughter-in-law. Additionally, she can seek a protection order under the DV Act, as upheld by the Supreme Court in the case of "Versha Kapoor vs Union of India". This order can be obtained if the daughter-in-law is found to be causing "matrimonial cruelty", which can also serve as grounds for divorce, as seen in "Samar Ghosh vs Jaya Ghosh (2007)".
• Recording Evidence: It is advisable for the mother-in-law to record any threats, verbal abuse, or instances of criminal intimidation. These recordings can be used as evidence to support her case and prove the false nature of the charges.
• Restraint Orders: The parents-in-law can apply for a restraint order to restrict the daughter-in-law's entry into their house. This ensures that the mother-in-law can live safely in her own home without fear of harassment or false accusations.
• Conflict of Laws: The conflict between the Domestic Violence Act and the Senior Citizens Act can be a complex issue. Amendments to Section 17 of the domestic violence law have been suggested to harmonize these conflicting rights and provide clearer guidelines for adjudicating residence rights in cases of family disputes.

In summary, while a daughter-in-law can file a case against her mother-in-law, false charges can be contested, and the mother-in-law has legal avenues to defend herself, seek protection, and assert her rights. The court system in India provides opportunities for both parties to present their cases and ensures that false accusations are not blindly accepted.

Frequently asked questions