Federal Agents And Municipal Laws: Who Enforces Them?

The relationship between federal, state, and municipal law enforcement agencies is a complex one. While federal laws are supreme, states are not obligated to enforce them and local police are not permitted to prosecute people for activities that are legal in the state but illegal at the federal level. However, local police cannot impede federal law enforcement agents from enforcing federal laws within their states. This dynamic has raised questions about the role of federalism in local policing and the potential overreach of the federal government.

Federal agents can enforce state laws with written permission from a sheriff or state official

Federal agents can enforce state laws with written permission from a sheriff or other authorized state official. This is because federal laws are supreme, and while states are not obligated to enforce them, they cannot stand in the way of federal law enforcement without facing consequences.

The Bureau of Land Management's (BLM) law enforcement program is an example of this. BLM law enforcement officers enforce federal laws and do not have the authority to enforce state laws without written authorization from a sheriff or other authorized state official. Many of the laws they enforce are similar to state and local laws, and many federal regulations prohibit the same acts as state laws, such as crimes like littering, illegal hunting of migratory waterfowl, and exceeding the posted speed limit.

Local law enforcement officials' jurisdictions are limited by the local (state or municipal) government's legal jurisdiction. This means that local law enforcement officials are not authorized to enforce federal law unless they are specifically given power by the federal entity that has jurisdiction over the law. In some cases, local sheriffs can choose not to participate in a federal action. However, they can be arrested for impeding a federal investigation if they do things to delay or prevent the lawful arrest of state citizens by federal enforcement agents.

The federal government already intervenes in significant ways to shape local policing. It empowers local officers by deputizing them to federal ends and pushes local agencies to pursue national public safety priorities, such as street-level drug enforcement and gun crime. The federal government can also use its discretion to enforce civil rights laws, implement federal programs, and run federal law enforcement agencies to improve policing.

Local police cannot prosecute people for activity that is legal in the state but illegal at the federal level

While local police officers are not required to enforce federal laws, they also cannot prosecute people for activity that is legal in the state but illegal at the federal level. This is because local law enforcement officials' enforcement jurisdictions are limited by the local government's legal jurisdiction.

In the rare cases where state law does not mimic federal law, local police do not have to prosecute people for activity that is legal in the state but illegal at the federal level. However, they are also not permitted to do so. Local officers are also not required to act in any way contrary to their own laws.

Local police have no power to stop the enforcement of federal laws by federal law enforcement personnel in their states. They do not need to help federal law enforcement agents, but they can be arrested for impeding a federal investigation if they do things to delay or prevent the lawful arrest of state citizens by federal enforcement agents.

The Constitution tries to make this a non-issue through the Supremacy Clause, indicating that any state law in conflict with a federal law is unconstitutional and superseded by the federal law. However, federal laws are supreme, and states are not obligated to enforce them. They just cannot stand in the way without bringing down much wider consequences.

While there is no federal police force, there are federal law enforcement agents such as U.S. Marshalls, FBI Agents, Drug Enforcement Agents, ATF Agents, Border Patrol, and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. These agents can enforce federal laws in states, but they need to supply their agents to do so. For example, if the DEA wants to raid a Colorado dispensary, they have to bring their agents to do it. Colorado cannot legally bar the DEA agents from doing their job, but they are under no obligation to enforce it either.

Local police are not required to help federal agents, but they can be arrested for impeding a federal investigation

While local police are not required to help federal agents, they also cannot impede a federal investigation. This means that local police officers cannot take actions that would delay or prevent the lawful arrest of state citizens by federal enforcement agents. If they do, they can be arrested for impeding a federal investigation.

The Constitution tries to prevent this issue through the Supremacy Clause, which states that any state law in conflict with a federal law is unconstitutional and superseded by the federal law. However, local police are not required to prosecute people for activities that are legal in the state but illegal at the federal level, nor are they permitted to.

Local law enforcement officials' jurisdictions are limited by the local government's legal jurisdiction. This means that their power as representatives of a specific government entity can only extend as far as the legal jurisdiction of that government. For example, local law enforcement officials are not authorized to enforce federal law unless the federal entity with jurisdiction over the law extends power to the local official.

While local sheriffs can choose not to participate in a given action, they also cannot stand in the way of federal investigations without bringing down wider consequences. Federal and state forces often have no choice but to cooperate with each other.

State police do not enforce federal law that has nothing to do with their state, like interstate fraud

While state and local police can generally enforce federal criminal law, they do not enforce federal civil law. This means that state police do not enforce federal law that has nothing to do with their state, unless it is a federal criminal law, like interstate fraud.

State and local police officers are authorised to arrest, without a previous complaint or warrant, any person for any offence in their jurisdiction. However, this does not extend to civil law. For example, in the case of United States v. Santana-Garcia, a Utah police officer stopped a vehicle for a traffic violation. The officer learned that the driver and passenger were not legally in the country, and the court held that the officer had probable cause to arrest both defendants for suspected violation of federal immigration law. This was a criminal law, and the officer had the authority to enforce it.

Local law enforcement officials' jurisdictions are limited by the local government's legal jurisdiction. This means that local law enforcement officials are not authorised to enforce federal law (except in specific cases where the federal entity that has jurisdiction over the law extends power to the local official).

In the case of Gonzales v. City of Peoria, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that federal law does not preclude local enforcement of the criminal provisions of the INA. This means that local police can enforce federal criminal law, but not federal civil law.

Federal laws are supreme, and while states are not obligated to enforce them, they cannot stand in the way of federal law enforcement without bringing wider consequences.

Federal deputation gives local law enforcement the power to enforce federal criminal law

While local law enforcement officials' jurisdiction is limited by the local government's legal authority, federal deputisation gives them the power to enforce federal criminal law. This means that local law enforcement officials can enforce federal criminal law, including criminal immigration law, but they cannot enforce civil immigration law without federal deputisation.

The Supremacy Clause in the Constitution states that any state law in conflict with a federal law is unconstitutional and superseded by the federal law. However, in practice, federal and state forces must cooperate due to the fear of wider consequences if they were to stand in the way of federal law enforcement. While states are not obligated to enforce federal laws, they cannot impede federal investigations or arrests of state citizens by federal enforcement agents.

Local sheriffs can choose not to participate in a federal action. However, they cannot prevent federal enforcement personnel from enforcing federal laws in their states. For example, in the case of Arizona v. United States, state authorities attempted to enforce a federal law, but most of it was struck down due to excessive entanglement between the different types of government.

The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) specifically gives BLM law enforcement officers traditional police powers, including enforcing federal laws, carrying firearms, serving search warrants, making arrests, and conducting searches and seizures. While the enforcement of criminal law is primarily the responsibility of state and local governments, the federal government can impose restrictions and ban certain practices to promote accountability and deter discrimination at the state and local levels.

Frequently asked questions