Federal District Courts: Interpreting State Law

Federal district courts are the general trial courts of the federal court system in the United States, which has a federal system of government in which power is shared between the federal government and state governments, both of which have their own court systems. Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, meaning they can only hear cases authorized by the United States Constitution or federal statutes. Cases that are entirely based on state law may be brought in federal court under the court's diversity jurisdiction, which allows a plaintiff of one state to file a lawsuit in federal court when the defendant is located in a different state. However, the Supreme Court of the United States, the highest court in the American judicial system, cannot consider cases decided entirely on state law, even if they are similar to federal law.

Federal district courts hear cases arising under federal law

The federal court system in the United States has three main levels: district courts, circuit courts, and the Supreme Court. There are 94 district courts, 13 circuit courts, and one Supreme Court. Federal district courts hear cases arising under federal law, including civil and criminal cases on the trial level. They are established by Congress and are broken down into 89 districts within the 50 states, with six more districts that include various US territories.

The federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, meaning they can only hear cases authorized by the United States Constitution or federal statutes. The federal district court is the starting point for any case arising under federal statutes, the Constitution, or treaties. This type of jurisdiction is called "original jurisdiction." In criminal matters, magistrate judges may oversee certain cases, issue search warrants and arrest warrants, conduct initial hearings, set bail, and decide on certain motions. In civil cases, magistrates often handle pre-trial motions and discovery.

Sometimes, the jurisdiction of state courts will overlap with that of federal courts, meaning some cases can be brought to either court. The plaintiff can initially choose to bring the case to either a state or federal court. If the plaintiff chooses a state court, the defendant may sometimes opt to "remove" the case to a federal court. Cases entirely based on state law may be brought to a federal court under the court's "diversity jurisdiction." Diversity jurisdiction allows a plaintiff from one state to file a lawsuit in federal court when the defendant is located in a different state.

It is important to note that a federal court is not bound by state court judgments on federal questions, even if the state courts have fully and fairly considered the issues. However, a federal habeas court may defer to the state court if the prisoner received an adequate hearing.

State courts interpret state laws and constitutions

The US Constitution creates a federal system of government, with power shared between the federal government and the state governments. Both the federal and state governments have their own court systems. The federal court system consists of district courts, circuit courts, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

In some cases, a federal court may consider questions of state law. For instance, in Moore v. Dempsey, the federal district court determined the merits of the petitioner's allegations, even though the state appellate court had already rejected them. However, federal courts cannot consider cases decided entirely on state law, even if similar to federal law. For example, if a freedom of speech case were decided by a state supreme court based on a state law similar to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court of the United States would not be able to consider the case.

While federal district courts can consider questions of state law, they are not bound by state court judgments on federal questions. This can lead to conflicts between federal and state courts, particularly when federal courts are open to persons complaining about unconstitutional or unlawful state action that could have been brought in state courts.

Federal courts hear cases involving the US government

The federal court system in the United States has three main levels: district courts, circuit courts, and the Supreme Court. There are 94 district courts, 13 circuit courts, and one Supreme Court throughout the country. The federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, meaning they can only hear cases authorized by the United States Constitution or federal statutes.

District courts are the trial courts, where cases are first heard. There are over 670 district court judges nationwide, who are responsible for managing the court and supervising the court's employees. Some tasks of the district court are given to federal magistrate judges, who are appointed by the district court and serve for a term of eight years if full-time and four years if part-time. In criminal matters, magistrate judges may oversee certain cases, issue search warrants and arrest warrants, conduct initial hearings, set bail, and decide on certain motions.

The circuit courts are the first level of appeal. In rare cases, the entire circuit court may consider certain appeals in a process called an "en banc hearing." There are 12 regional circuits and one Federal Circuit. The appellate court's task is to determine whether the law was applied correctly in the trial court or federal administrative agency.

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the American judicial system and has the power to decide appeals on all cases brought in federal or state courts. It is the final level of appeal in the federal system. After a circuit court or state supreme court has ruled on a case, either party may choose to appeal to the Supreme Court by filing a "writ of certiorari." The Supreme Court is not required to hear the appeal, and it only grants certiorari in less than 1% of cases.

Federal courts can hear cases involving 'diversity of citizenship'

Federal district courts can hear cases involving diversity of citizenship, also known as diversity jurisdiction. Diversity jurisdiction is a form of subject-matter jurisdiction that gives federal courts the power to hear lawsuits that do not involve a federal question.

For a federal court to have diversity jurisdiction over a lawsuit, two conditions must be met. Firstly, there must be "diversity of citizenship" between the parties, meaning the plaintiffs must be citizens of different states than the defendants. Secondly, the lawsuit's "amount in controversy" must be more than $75,000. If a lawsuit does not meet these two conditions, federal courts will usually lack jurisdiction to hear it unless it involves a federal question, and the lawsuit would need to be heard in a state court instead.

The concept of diversity jurisdiction originated in Article III, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, which grants Congress the power to permit federal courts to hear diversity cases through legislation authorizing such jurisdiction. Diversity jurisdiction was further developed through various statutes and Supreme Court cases, such as the Judiciary Act of 1789, the Strawbridge v. Curtiss case in 1806, and the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005.

It is important to note that diversity jurisdiction is not available in all cases. For example, if a case requires the presence of a party who is from the same state as an opposing party, the case must be dismissed as the absent party is deemed "indispensable". Additionally, if a case is initially filed in a state court and does not meet the requirements for federal jurisdiction, it cannot be removed to a federal court unless certain conditions are met, such as the presence of a diverse defendant or the existence of supplemental jurisdiction.

Federal courts are not bound by state court judgments on federal questions

The federal court system in the United States is a complex and layered one, with power shared between the federal government and state governments, as outlined in the US Constitution. The federal district court is the starting point for cases arising under federal statutes, the Constitution, or treaties. This is known as "original jurisdiction".

Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, meaning they can only hear cases authorized by the US Constitution or federal statutes. Sometimes, the jurisdiction of state courts will overlap with federal courts, and a case can be brought in either court. The plaintiff can choose to bring the case in state or federal court, but if they choose the former, the defendant may sometimes opt to "remove" the case to a federal court.

The US Supreme Court is the highest court in the American judicial system and has the power to decide appeals on all cases brought in federal court or those brought in state court but dealing with federal law. For example, a First Amendment freedom of speech case decided by a state supreme court could be appealed to the federal Supreme Court. However, if the same case were decided solely on a state law similar to the First Amendment, the Supreme Court would not be able to consider it.

In the landmark case of Brown v. Allen, the Court laid down several principles of statutory construction of the habeas statute. One of these principles established that a federal court is not bound by state court judgments on federal questions, even if the state courts have fully and fairly considered the issues. This means that federal courts have the authority to review and potentially overturn decisions made by state courts when federal laws or the US Constitution are in question. This does not apply to cases decided solely on the basis of state law, where the Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction to review the decision.

Frequently asked questions