Federal Arrest Authority: County Sheriff's Will Vs Federal Law

The role of a sheriff's office varies from state to state and county to county. While their primary role is to provide enforcement services for the courts, they are sworn peace officers with the power to make arrests, serve warrants, and give tickets. In some places, only the governor can arrest a sheriff, and in some states, the local government has limited control over a sheriff's budget or allocation of funds. Federal law enforcement has supremacy in most situations, and officers of lower jurisdictions can enforce laws above them. However, they cannot use force to arrest federal agents for breach of state law, but they can sue them in court.

Federal law enforcement has supremacy in most situations

Federal law enforcement officers have supremacy over local law enforcement officers in most situations. This is because the federal government is in charge of the country and has more power. While local law enforcement officers can enforce federal laws, they cannot arrest federal agents for breaching state law. They can, however, sue them in court or elect representatives to get the law changed.

The role of a sheriff's office varies from state to state and county to county. In some places, only the governor can arrest a sheriff. In some states, the sheriff is the chief law enforcement officer of the county and has county-wide jurisdiction. In other states, the sheriff's deputies are responsible for routine law enforcement and have the authority to arrest anywhere in the state or outside the state for crimes committed within the state.

In some cases, local law enforcement officers can make arrests outside their jurisdiction. For example, if they witness a crime, they may be able to make a citizen's arrest, which has the same power as an arrest made by any other citizen. In addition, many police and sheriff's departments have mutual aid agreements with neighboring jurisdictions, allowing them to make arrests and conduct investigations across city or county limits.

Local law enforcement cannot use force or arrest federal agents on the spot

The relationship between local law enforcement and federal agents is a complex one, with federal law enforcement having supremacy in most situations. While local law enforcement officers can arrest federal agents under certain circumstances, they cannot use force or arrest federal agents on the spot for a breach of state law. This is because, ultimately, federal laws trump state laws, and local law enforcement has no power to stop the enforcement of federal laws by federal agents.

In the case of a conflict between state and federal law, federal law takes precedence. For example, local police are not permitted to prosecute people for activities that are legal in their state but illegal at the federal level. They also cannot impede a federal investigation, as this could result in their own arrest. Local law enforcement is also not required to act contrary to their own laws or assist federal agents. However, they cannot prevent federal agents from carrying out their duties, even if it involves enforcing a federal law that contradicts state law.

The "`constitutional sheriff` movement, comprising current and former law enforcement members, believes that sheriffs are the ultimate authority in their jurisdiction, even above federal law enforcement. This movement has links to white supremacy and has resulted in sheriffs refusing to enforce federal gun laws and deporting undocumented immigrants. While sheriffs have significant power due to their roles being enshrined in state constitutions, they can still be arrested by specific officials for misconduct or contempt of court.

The inability of local law enforcement to use force or arrest federal agents on the spot can create an imbalance, with federal agents potentially abusing their power and performing illegal acts without repercussions. Local law enforcement can take recourse through the court system or by electing representatives to change the laws. However, this process can be lengthy, and by the time a resolution is reached, the perpetrators may face no consequences.

Sheriffs are the ultimate authority in their jurisdiction, even above federal law enforcement

The role of a sheriff's office varies from state to state and even from county to county. In some places, only the governor can arrest a sheriff. In some states, there is a limited amount that local governments can do to change a sheriff's budget or determine the allocation of funds. In many cases, only a specific official can arrest a sheriff, even if they have broken the law.

Sheriffs are sworn peace officers with the power to make arrests, serve before a magistrate or judge, serve warrants for arrest or order for arrest, and give a ticket/citation in order to keep the peace. Some states extend this authority to adjacent counties or to the entire state. In a small sheriff's office, the sheriff is likely to carry out law enforcement duties just like a regular deputy or police officer. In a medium-sized or large sheriff's office, this is rare, and the sheriff will primarily perform leadership and management.

Sheriffs' deputies primarily offer routine law enforcement services to the unincorporated portions of the county, but they have the authority to arrest anywhere in the state or outside the state for crimes committed within the state. Persons arrested by Utah Peace Officers outside of the State of Utah must be turned over to local authorities for extradition unless they are arrested following a hot pursuit that exits the state.

The "constitutional sheriff" movement is made up of current and former members of law enforcement who believe that sheriffs are the ultimate authority in their jurisdiction, even above federal law enforcement. Constitutional sheriffs have links to white supremacy. Famous members include Joe Arpaio and David Clarke, the ex-sheriff of Milwaukee County, who is an unabashed Trump supporter. While it may seem like a fringe movement, it is prevalent enough to be taken seriously. In 2013, 500 sheriffs agreed not to enforce any gun laws created by the federal government. In Utah, almost all elected sheriffs signed an agreement to protect the Bill of Rights and fight any federal officials who tried to limit them.

However, it is important to note that the Supreme Court has not held that the law enforcement authority of sheriffs is superior to that of other state or federal officers, or that they may violate state or federal law. While sheriffs may have a significant amount of power and autonomy, they are still subject to the rule of law and can be held accountable for their actions.

Sheriffs can make arrests with or without a warrant

In the United States, the role of a sheriff's office varies from state to state and even from county to county. Sheriffs and their deputies are sworn peace officers with the power to make arrests and serve before a magistrate or judge, serve warrants for arrest or order for arrest, and give a ticket/citation in order to keep the peace.

In some states, the sheriff's office provides routine law enforcement services to the unincorporated portions of the county, while in others, they primarily provide enforcement services for the courts. For example, in Arkansas, sheriffs and their deputies are fully empowered peace officers with county-wide jurisdiction and may legally exercise their authority in unincorporated and incorporated areas of a county. They can make arrests with or without a warrant, as long as the warrantless arrest is due to a violation of law committed in their presence or view.

In Texas, the Harris County Sheriff's Office (HCSO) has established directives for both warrant and warrantless arrests. Deputies must follow the rules of arrest established in the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) and comply with any changes in the law or requirements mandated by court decisions. They must have reasonable suspicion to believe that a person has or will commit an offense to detain or arrest them. When executing a warrant, deputies must verify the warrant through the Criminal Warrants Division and advise the suspect that the arrest is being made pursuant to a warrant.

While sheriffs have significant power, they are not above the law. For example, ex-Sheriff Arpaio was found in contempt of court in 2017 for refusing to follow a federal judge's order to stop profiling and detaining Latinx people during traffic stops and immigration raids. In another case, nine former sheriff department employees pleaded guilty to civil rights violations, demonstrating that sheriffs and their deputies are subject to legal consequences for their actions.

Sheriffs can arrest anywhere in the state or outside the state for crimes committed within the state

In the United States, there are three types of law enforcement officers: city police officers, county sheriffs, and state police officers. Typically, each type of law enforcement officer can only make arrests in the city or municipality that they work for. However, there are exceptions to this rule, and the specifics can vary from state to state and even from county to county.

County sheriffs and their deputies are sworn peace officers with the power to make arrests, serve before a magistrate or judge, and serve or order arrest warrants. In some states, this authority is extended beyond the county to adjacent counties or even the entire state. For example, in Arkansas, sheriffs and their deputies are fully empowered peace officers with county-wide jurisdiction, allowing them to make arrests anywhere in the county. Similarly, in Utah, persons arrested by peace officers outside the state must be turned over to local authorities for extradition unless they are arrested following a hot pursuit that exits the state.

Under the general rule of territorial jurisdiction, a suspect may evade arrest by fleeing a pursuing officer's territorial jurisdiction. However, there is a recognized exception to this rule, known as the "fresh pursuit" exception. This exception allows officers to arrest suspects outside their jurisdiction when in "fresh pursuit" of a suspect who committed a crime within their territory. The limits on the fresh pursuit exception can vary between states, with some states only allowing this exception for felony crimes.

While federal law enforcement officers generally have jurisdiction throughout the United States, state law enforcement officers typically must remain in their own state to make an arrest. However, there may be exceptions if a state grants special permission for an out-of-state officer to make an arrest within its borders. It is important to note that local law enforcement officers cannot use force to arrest and detain federal agents for breaching state law but can take other recourse actions such as suing them in court or electing representatives to change the law.

Frequently asked questions