The Law Of Conservation: Can It Ever Be Broken?

The law of conservation of energy is a fundamental principle in physics that states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another. This means that in a closed system, the total amount of energy remains constant, and any change in energy must be due to energy entering or leaving the system. While this principle has never been proven wrong, there are theoretical scenarios where it could be violated, particularly in the realm of quantum mechanics and general relativity. These violations, however, would be extremely short-lived and unobservable due to the uncertainty principle.

Energy can be 'borrowed' for a short time

The law of conservation of energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed or transferred from one form to another. This is a long-standing principle with roots in the work of 17th-century scientists like Galileo, Huygens, and Newton. However, the idea that energy can be "borrowed" for a short time arises in discussions of short-lived states or resonances. This concept is related to the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics, which allows for small violations of energy conservation over very short periods.

The uncertainty principle states that the product of uncertainty in energy and uncertainty in time is greater than a very small number (h-bar/2 or h/4, depending on the source). This means that if the uncertainty in energy is large enough, it is possible to “borrow” energy from “nowhere” for a very short time, as long as it is returned before it can be detected. This “borrowing” is so small that it cannot be directly observed, but it can have important consequences.

One example of this "borrowing" of energy is in the case of a collision between two particles. If the total energy of the two particles before the collision is E1, and after the collision, they combine into a third particle whose rest energy alone is E2, which is larger than E1, then this indicates that the intermediate particle borrowed energy. This is because the two original particles did not have enough energy to produce the third particle without borrowing energy from somewhere else. For this to work, the amount of borrowed energy multiplied by the intermediate particle's lifetime must be lower than a certain value (h/2 or h/4).

Another example of energy borrowing can be found in the concept of alpha decay in quantum mechanics. In this process, it is proposed that the "extra energy" required comes from the vacuum, as the vacuum is not truly empty but rather fluctuates continuously. These fluctuations can provide a small input of energy that can be "borrowed" as long as it is returned, so that the average vacuum expectation value is always zero.

It is important to note that while the law of conservation of energy can be violated in theory, it is only possible under extremely specific and limited circumstances. These violations are so small and short-lived that they cannot be directly observed. However, they do have indirect effects and can provide valuable insights into the nature of energy and the universe.

General relativity may violate the law

The law of conservation of energy states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed; instead, it can only be transformed or transferred from one form to another. In classical mechanics, there is no mechanism to allow for non-conservation of energy. However, certain phenomena and theories challenge this law and raise questions about potential violations. One of these theories is general relativity.

General relativity, as proposed by Einstein, suggests that space and time are dynamical and can evolve over time. This challenges the concept of time-translation invariance, which is crucial for energy conservation. In the context of general relativity, the total energy of particles is not conserved when the space through which they move is changing. This is because, in general relativity, energy and momentum do not have invariant meanings by themselves. However, when combined, they form a geometric object called a 4-vector that is invariant.

The debate surrounding energy conservation in general relativity centres on the inclusion of the gravitational field in the energy equation. Some theorists argue that general relativity does not have time-translation invariance because the gravitational field is not invariant. They propose including the gravitational field as a dynamical field with its own time-translation invariance. This approach, however, has been met with criticism, as some argue that these arguments are based on incorrect physics.

Additionally, in general relativity, spacetime is curved, which presents challenges when attempting to generalize energy conservation equations. While the differential form of the equation extends without issues, the integral form breaks down. This breakdown suggests that energy conservation in general relativity may require a more nuanced understanding and potentially new definitions of total energy in curved spacetimes.

Despite these complexities and ongoing debates, it is important to note that energy conservation has been experimentally verified in all circumstances where it is currently possible to test it. The discussion of energy conservation in general relativity highlights the intricate nature of the theory and the ongoing efforts to reconcile it with the established laws of physics.

Energy can be converted between forms

The law of conservation of energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed. Instead, it can only be transformed or transferred from one form to another. This is also known as energy conversion or energy transformation.

Energy conversion is a fundamental principle of physics. There are various forms of energy, including kinetic energy, potential energy, thermal energy, and chemical energy. For example, chemical energy can be converted into kinetic energy, as seen in an explosion. The chemical energy in the dynamite is converted into kinetic energy, which is the energy of motion. Similarly, in a coal-fired power plant, the chemical energy in the coal is converted into thermal energy in the exhaust gases of combustion. This thermal energy is then converted into steam through heat exchange, and the kinetic energy of the steam is converted into mechanical energy in the turbine.

Another example of energy conversion is seen in an automobile. The chemical energy in the fuel is converted into the kinetic energy of the expanding gas through combustion. This kinetic energy is then converted into linear piston movement, which is further converted into rotary crankshaft movement. The rotary movement of the drive wheels is then converted back into the linear motion of the automobile.

Energy conversion can also be observed in natural processes, such as an object in an elliptical orbit. As the object moves away from its parent body, it converts its kinetic energy into gravitational potential energy. When it reaches the furthest point, it reverses the process, converting potential energy back into kinetic energy.

While the law of conservation of energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, it is important to note that there are debates and complexities surrounding this principle. In certain scenarios, such as in quantum mechanics, the possibility of conservation violation exists, but it is highly debated and has never been directly observed.

Mass-energy equivalence

The concept of mass-energy equivalence arose from special relativity, with Einstein first proposing the idea in his annus mirabilis ("miracle year") papers published in 1905. In these papers, Einstein built upon his earlier work on the theory of special relativity to suggest that the mass and energy of an object are interconnected. This proposal was considered revolutionary, as it challenged the traditional understanding of inertial mass in Newtonian physics, which construed it as an intrinsic property of an object that does not change.

The mass-energy equivalence theory has significant implications in various fields of physics, including nuclear and particle physics. It helps explain phenomena such as the conversion of mass into energy during nuclear reactions, where the mass of the atoms that come out of a nuclear reaction is less than the mass of the atoms that go in, and the difference shows up as heat and light. This principle also applies to closed systems like an atomic nucleus, planet, or star, where the relativistic energy is the sum of the relativistic energies of each of its parts.

Furthermore, mass-energy equivalence has practical applications, particularly in nuclear engineering and the development of nuclear weapons. For example, the first confirmation of mass-energy equivalence by Cockcroft and Walton in 1932 led to the creation of the atomic bomb through nuclear fission. Additionally, it helps us understand the process of nuclear fusion in the Sun, where hydrogen atoms are converted into helium atoms, releasing energy that provides heat and light to the Earth.

Perpetual motion machines are impossible

The law of conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system remains constant and is conserved over time. In other words, energy can neither be created nor destroyed but can only be transformed or transferred from one form to another. For example, chemical energy is converted to kinetic energy when a stick of dynamite explodes.

A perpetual motion machine is a machine that moves perpetually and never stops. It is a system without an external energy supply that delivers an unlimited amount of energy to its surroundings. However, the law of conservation of energy implies that such a machine cannot exist. This is because the machine would violate the principle that energy cannot be created or destroyed but only transferred.

There are several other reasons why perpetual motion machines are impossible. Firstly, any moving parts in a machine will inevitably create friction, which will cause the machine to lose energy to heat. This is a fundamental problem, as there is no such thing as a perfectly smooth object. Secondly, the machine would have to be operated in a vacuum to avoid energy loss due to air friction. Thirdly, the machine should not produce any sound, as sound is also a form of energy loss.

While it is theoretically possible to "borrow" energy for a very short time, as described by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, this energy must be returned, and any violation of the conservation of energy would be within the limits of uncertainty and unobservable. Therefore, it is impossible to create a true perpetual motion machine that does not violate the law of conservation of energy.

Frequently asked questions