Conway's Free Commercial: Ivanka Brand And The Law

On February 9, 2017, Kellyanne Conway, counsellor to then-US President Donald Trump, promoted Ivanka Trump's clothing line during a televised interview from the White House Briefing Room. Conway encouraged viewers to go buy Ivanka's stuff and declared that she would give a free commercial for the brand. This incident raised questions about whether Conway had broken federal ethics laws by using her position as a White House official to endorse a product that financially benefits the first family. Legal and ethics experts pointed to specific regulations and employee standards that prohibit public servants from using their public office for private gain or endorsing any product, service, or enterprise. The House Oversight Committee also expressed concern over Conway's actions, with the committee chairman calling the promotion clearly over the line, unacceptable. The White House responded by stating that Conway had been 'counselled' on the matter, but it is unclear if any further disciplinary action was taken.

Kellyanne Conway's endorsement of Ivanka Trump's products

On February 9, 2017, Kellyanne Conway, counsellor to then-US President Donald Trump, endorsed Ivanka Trump's clothing and accessories line during a televised interview on Fox News. Ivanka Trump is the daughter of Donald Trump and Conway's friend.

Conway encouraged viewers to "go buy Ivanka's stuff", describing it as "a wonderful line" that she herself owns. She added that she was going to "give it a free commercial" and told viewers they could "find it online".

Conway's endorsement of Ivanka Trump's products raised questions about the ethics of a White House official promoting a product that financially benefits the first family. Legal experts and ethics lawyers pointed out that Conway's endorsement appeared to violate federal ethics laws and regulations that prohibit the use of public office to endorse a product. The relevant regulation, 5 C.F.R. 2635.702, states:

> "An employee shall not use his public office for his own private gain, for the endorsement of any product, service or enterprise, or for the private gain of friends, relatives, or persons with whom the employee is affiliated in a nongovernmental capacity, including nonprofit organizations of which the employee is an officer or member, and persons with whom the employee has or seeks employment or business relations."

The ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, Representative Elijah Cummings, said that Conway's endorsement was "a textbook case of a violation of the law". He and the committee's chair, Representative Jason Chaffetz, sent a letter to the Office of Government Ethics, urging it to recommend disciplinary action.

In response to the controversy, White House press secretary Sean Spicer said that Conway had been "counselled" on the matter.

The ethics of a White House official promoting a product

The ethics of a White House official promoting any product are questionable, but the case of Conway and Ivanka Trump's brand is especially problematic due to the close personal relationship between the two. Conway's endorsement appeared to violate a key federal ethics rule prohibiting public office from being used for private gain or product endorsement. This rule is in place to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure that government employees serve the public, not their own interests or those of their associates.

Conway's comments caused an uproar, with legal and ethics experts arguing that she had broken the law. The ranking Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Elijah Cummings, stated that Conway's actions were "a textbook case of a violation of the law". He, along with Rep. Jason Chaffetz, the chair of the Oversight Committee, called for an ethics investigation and disciplinary action.

The Office of Government Ethics, tasked with upholding ethical standards for government employees, faced pressure to address the issue. While the White House initially defended Conway's comments as a “flippant response”, it later acknowledged that she had been “counselled” on the matter.

This incident highlights the importance of ethical conduct by government officials and the potential consequences when these standards are not met. It also underscores the complexity of separating personal interests from official duties, especially in an administration with extensive business ties like the Trump administration.

Conway's actions and their aftermath demonstrate the challenges of maintaining ethical standards in government and the need for transparency and accountability in addressing potential conflicts of interest.

Conway's comments and federal law

On February 9, 2017, Kellyanne Conway, counsellor to President Donald Trump, appeared to endorse Ivanka Trump's clothing line during a televised interview from the White House briefing room. Conway encouraged viewers to "go buy Ivanka's stuff" and said she would give a "free commercial" for the brand.

Conway's comments sparked controversy and raised ethical concerns. Legal experts and ethics professors pointed out that her endorsement appeared to violate federal ethics laws and regulations. The relevant statute, 5 C.F.R. 2635.702, prohibits employees from using their public office for private gain or endorsing any product, service, or enterprise. This regulation is intended to prevent the use of public office for personal gain and to maintain public trust in the integrity of government operations.

The House Oversight Committee, including its chairman, expressed concern over Conway's remarks, calling them "clearly over the line" and unacceptable. Representative Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the committee, stated that Conway's actions were a "textbook case of a violation of the law." He and Representative Jason Chaffetz, the committee chair, sent a letter to the Office of Government Ethics, urging disciplinary action.

The White House's response to the situation was somewhat muted. Press Secretary Sean Spicer stated that Conway had been "counselled" on the matter, but no further details or repercussions were disclosed.

The role of the Department of Justice in investigating Conway's actions

The Department of Justice (DOJ) plays a crucial role in investigating and enforcing ethical violations by government officials, including those related to conflicts of interest and misuse of public office. In the case of Kellyanne Conway's endorsement of Ivanka Trump's brand, the DOJ has the authority to initiate an investigation and take appropriate action.

Conway, a counsellor and senior advisor to President Donald Trump, sparked controversy by using her position to promote Ivanka Trump's fashion line during a televised interview. This incident raised questions about potential violations of federal ethics laws and regulations. The relevant statute, 5 C.F.R. 2635.702, prohibits employees from using their public office for private gain or endorsing any product, service, or enterprise.

The role of the DOJ in this specific case is significant. As the federal agency responsible for enforcing ethical standards, it can initiate an investigation into Conway's actions to determine if a violation occurred. This investigation would likely involve reviewing evidence, interviewing witnesses, and analysing relevant laws and regulations. The DOJ has the authority to subpoena documents, gather testimony, and take sworn statements to uncover any wrongdoing.

If the DOJ finds sufficient evidence of an ethics violation, it can take several actions. These include civil penalties, such as fines or other monetary penalties, and even criminal charges if the violation is severe and intentional. The DOJ can also work with other government agencies, such as the Office of Government Ethics, to ensure that disciplinary actions are taken within the executive branch. These actions could range from official reprimands to suspension or dismissal, depending on the severity of the violation.

The DOJ's decision on whether to investigate and prosecute Conway's actions will be closely watched by the public and lawmakers. It sets a precedent for how the administration handles conflicts of interest and ethical violations by its officials. The outcome will also shape perceptions of the DOJ's independence and commitment to upholding ethical standards, particularly in the context of a presidential administration.

In conclusion, the Department of Justice plays a vital role in upholding ethical standards in government by investigating and enforcing violations. Its actions in the Conway case will have broader implications for transparency, accountability, and public trust in the Trump administration.

The White House's response to the incident

Spicer also defended President Trump's use of the @POTUS Twitter handle to discuss Ivanka Trump's business, saying: "This was less about his family's business and an attack on his daughter."

Stephen Miller, a senior adviser to President Trump, echoed Spicer's statement, saying: "Conway’s comment was a 'flippant response' the media has blown out of proportion."

Frequently asked questions