Flynn's Actions: Logan Act Violation?

Michael Flynn's contacts with Russia sparked controversy and raised questions about whether he broke the law by violating the Logan Act. The Logan Act, enacted in 1799, prohibits private citizens from interfering in foreign diplomacy or corresponding with foreign governments without authorization. Flynn, a retired US Army lieutenant general, served briefly as National Security Advisor to President Trump and resigned amid allegations of inappropriate discussions with the Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, about sanctions during the transition before Trump's inauguration. While Flynn's actions sparked debate about the applicability of the Logan Act, prosecution under this act is considered unlikely due to its vague nature and constitutional concerns related to freedom of speech and association.

Michael Flynn resigned as national security advisor in 2017

Michael Flynn's resignation as national security advisor in 2017 came after a short but tumultuous tenure. Appointed by President Donald Trump in November 2016, Flynn stepped down on February 13, 2017, after just 22 days on the job.

Flynn's departure was precipitated by revelations that he had discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia with Sergey Kislyak, the Russian ambassador to the United States, before Trump took office. These discussions breached government protocols and raised suspicions of a potential violation of the Logan Act, an obscure 18th-century federal law. The Logan Act prohibits private citizens from unauthorized negotiations with foreign governments in disputes involving the United States.

The controversy surrounding Flynn's contacts with Ambassador Kislyak was further exacerbated by his misleading statements to Vice President Mike Pence and other administration officials about the nature of these communications. Flynn's actions led to concerns within the White House that he could be vulnerable to blackmail by the Russians.

Amid mounting pressure, Flynn resigned, acknowledging that he had provided incomplete information about his conversations with the Russian ambassador. His resignation marked the culmination of a series of events that brought his brief tenure as national security advisor to an end.

He was accused of inappropriate discussions with the Russian ambassador

Michael Flynn, former U.S. National Security Advisor, was accused of inappropriate discussions with the Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, in December 2016. The controversy surrounding these communications brought attention to an obscure 18th-century federal law known as the Logan Act.

The Logan Act, passed in 1799, prohibits private citizens from negotiating with foreign governments in disputes involving the United States. While it has never been used to prosecute any American citizen successfully, Flynn's conversations with Ambassador Kislyak raised suspicions of a potential violation.

Declassified transcripts revealed that Flynn asked Kislyak to urge his government to take "reciprocal" action in response to President Obama's sanctions for Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Flynn wanted Russia to avoid escalating the situation and suggested that a better conversation about their relationship could occur once the Trump administration took office.

Flynn's discussions with Kislyak were particularly concerning because they occurred before President Trump's inauguration and involved sensitive matters of U.S. foreign policy. Flynn was accused of undermining the outgoing Obama administration's sanctions and potentially colluding with Russia to influence the election. These actions could be perceived as a threat to national security and a misuse of power.

Flynn initially denied discussing sanctions with Kislyak but later pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about their conversations. However, he later attempted to withdraw his guilty plea and accused the government of trying to frame him. The controversy surrounding Flynn's interactions with Ambassador Kislyak sparked intense political debates and legal battles, with critics alleging inappropriate and potentially illegal behaviour.

He misled Vice President Pence about these discussions

On the 13th of February 2017, Michael Flynn resigned from his position as National Security Advisor after it was revealed that he had misled Vice President Mike Pence and others about the nature and content of his communications with Sergey Kislyak, the Russian ambassador to the United States.

Flynn's discussions with Kislyak took place in late December 2016, during the presidential transition period. During this time, Flynn, in his capacity as National Security Advisor, spoke with Kislyak about sanctions imposed on Russia by the Obama administration in response to Russian interference in the 2016 US election.

The Logan Act, passed in 1799, prohibits US citizens from engaging in unauthorized negotiations with foreign governments in disputes with the US. While the act has never been successfully used to prosecute an American citizen, Flynn's discussions with Kislyak raised concerns that he may have violated the act.

On February 9, 2017, two weeks after other White House officials were briefed on the matter, Vice President Pence learned that Flynn had misled him about the nature of his contact with Kislyak. This revelation came on the same day that a Washington Post report was published, detailing the extent of Flynn's contact with the Russian ambassador.

Flynn's resignation on February 13 came after White House officials, including Pence, were made aware of the controversy surrounding his discussions with Kislyak. In his resignation letter, Flynn acknowledged that he had provided incomplete information about his conversations with the Russian ambassador.

The controversy surrounding Flynn's discussions with Kislyak and his subsequent resignation brought attention to the Logan Act and raised questions about the appropriateness of his actions. While Flynn's discussions with Kislyak may not have directly violated the Logan Act, the fact that he misled Vice President Pence and other senior government officials about the nature of these discussions contributed to his resignation and the scrutiny he faced.

He was interviewed by the FBI in 2017

On January 24, 2017, Michael Flynn was interviewed by the FBI about his contacts with Sergey Kislyak, the former Russian Ambassador to the United States. The interview took place just days after Flynn assumed his role as National Security Advisor.

Flynn was questioned repeatedly about whether he had discussed sanctions with Russia during his conversations with Kislyak. He denied having any such discussions, claiming that he was unaware of the planned sanctions during a call with Kislyak in late December 2016 because he was on vacation in the Dominican Republic. However, court filings revealed that on December 29, 2016, Flynn asked Kislyak to "refrain from escalating the situation" in response to the sanctions imposed that day.

Flynn also told the FBI agents that "it was possible that he talked to Kislyak on the issue, but if he did, he did not remember doing so." He further stated that he had discussed his calls with Kislyak with other unnamed members of the presidential transition team.

The FBI agents also asked Flynn about a U.N. vote regarding Israeli settlements, and he confirmed that he had called officials in several countries, including Israel, the United Kingdom, and possibly Russia, to understand their positions on the resolution. Flynn denied asking Kislyak to vote a certain way and stated that his calls were only to gather information.

As a result of the interview, Flynn was pushed out as National Security Advisor a few weeks later, after conversations between White House counsel and Acting Attorney General Sally Yates. Yates hinted that Flynn might be subject to blackmail by the Russians over his earlier telephone call with Kislyak.

Flynn ultimately resigned as National Security Advisor in February 2017, after it was revealed that he had misled Vice President Pence and other administration officials about his talks with Kislyak regarding sanctions. Months later, he pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI during the January 2017 interview.

Flynn may have violated the First Amendment

Michael Flynn, former National Security Advisor to President Trump, has been at the center of controversy regarding his communications with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Sergey Kislyak. The controversy surrounds discussions about U.S. sanctions on Russia, imposed after U.S. intelligence officials determined that Russia had interfered in the 2016 presidential election. Flynn allegedly told the Russian ambassador "not to worry" about the sanctions, as there would soon be a "new sheriff" in town—implying that Trump's administration would take a different approach.

These conversations have raised questions about a potential violation of the Logan Act, a federal law enacted in 1799. The Logan Act makes it a felony for private citizens to engage in international diplomacy that undermines U.S. foreign policy. While the Act has never been successfully used to prosecute any American citizen, Flynn's communications appear to fall within its scope. However, there are doubts about whether prosecuting Flynn under the Logan Act would violate the First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech and expression.

Some argue that by modern standards, Flynn would have a strong First Amendment defense. The First Amendment provides robust protection for speech critical of the government and communications addressing matters of public concern. Laws that target speech based on its content, like the Logan Act, are subject to strict scrutiny, which requires the government to have a compelling interest in restricting speech and to adopt the least restrictive means to serve that interest. In the context of international diplomacy, the government may have a compelling interest in preventing private citizens from interfering. However, the Logan Act's broad restrictions on communications with foreign governments may not be the narrowest means to achieve this goal.

On the other hand, it is important to consider that the First Amendment's application to communications with foreign persons or powers is not fully settled. Throughout history, the U.S. government has acted as if the First Amendment does not fully apply in these contexts, imposing content-based restrictions on materials exchanged with foreign entities and restricting citizens' travel to certain countries. The Logan Act belongs to this family of speech restrictions, reflecting concerns about foreign influence on U.S. citizens and institutions.

The Supreme Court has rarely addressed how communications with foreign entities align with First Amendment principles. In the case of Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, the Court applied a more deferential form of review, suggesting that communications with foreign nationals are not inherently protected to the same extent as domestic speech. This case involved U.S. citizens wanting to teach members of foreign organizations designated as terrorist groups about peaceful conflict resolution and international law. The Court allowed the government to criminalize this association, citing concerns about foreign influence raised by the nation's founders.

While Flynn's communications may seem less concerning than those in the Holder case, the lack of clear guidance from the Supreme Court on the First Amendment's application in such contexts leaves room for doubt. This uncertainty underscores the need for a more definitive interpretation of the First Amendment that reflects the modern reality of globalized communication and interaction across borders.

Frequently asked questions