Jesus And Roman Law: A Complex Dynamic

Jesus of Nazareth, a figure who preached peace, kindness, and forgiveness, was accused of breaking both Roman and Jewish laws. The Jewish authorities condemned him for blasphemy and petitioned the Romans to take action. The Romans found him guilty in Pilate's court, but the specific law that Jesus broke was likely not a central concern. Jesus was a citizen of a client kingdom, and therefore subject to its laws, but the Roman governor Pilate tried to pass the buck to Herod, who sent Jesus back to Pilate.

Jesus was eventually sentenced to death for his crimes, but it is unclear which laws he broke. The Jewish leaders accused him of misleading the nation, opposing paying taxes to Caesar, and claiming to be the Messiah, a king. Pilate declared Jesus innocent of these charges, but still allowed the execution to take place to please the crowd and avoid a riot.

Jesus did break Jewish Sabbath laws by healing people on the holy day, but he did not break any Old Testament commands. He also touched a leper, which was prohibited by the Law of Moses, but he did so to demonstrate his love and compassion.

Jesus's actions and teachings challenged the traditional interpretations of the law and encouraged a more compassionate and inclusive approach. He did not abolish the law but fulfilled it, bringing a new understanding.

Jesus' crucifixion was legal

Whether or not Jesus broke Roman law is a complex question. While he was certainly judged as a lawbreaker by the religious leaders and governmental authorities of his time, Jesus likely did not break any civil or religious laws.

Jesus was a Jew, and the Roman government allowed the Jews to worship as they pleased. As the fulfilment of the Jewish religion, Jesus would not have violated the law since it granted permission to worship God. However, he was accused of blasphemy by the Jewish authorities, who then petitioned the Roman authorities to take action.

From the Roman perspective, Jesus was technically a citizen of a client kingdom and therefore subject to its laws. Pilate, the Roman governor, found Jesus guilty in his court. The specific law that Jesus broke was probably not at the forefront of anyone's mind. However, the charges against him included misleading the nation, opposing the payment of taxes to Caesar, and claiming to be the Messiah, a king.

Crucifixion was a standard punishment for the crimes Jesus was accused of, and it was consistent with the punishments handed out at the time. A Spanish legal scholar, Jose Maria Ribas Alba, who spent 25 years researching Jesus's trial, concluded that Jesus received due process under Roman law. The criminal proceedings against him were legal and consistent with the legal criteria of the time.

In conclusion, while the question of whether Jesus broke Roman law is complex, it appears that his crucifixion was indeed legal.

Jesus' actions in the Temple broke civil law

Jesus's actions in the Temple, where he drove out the money changers, almost certainly broke civil law. Jesus was arrested and convicted, and his conviction was upheld in the highest court available to him. However, the specific charges against him are not entirely clear.

The Jewish authorities accused Jesus of blasphemy, but this would not have held any weight in Roman law. The Roman governor, Pontius Pilate, found Jesus innocent and rejected the charges against him. Pilate did, however, ultimately allow Jesus to be crucified, perhaps out of fear of causing a riot if he released a man beloved by the crowd.

Some have argued that Jesus was found guilty of treason or sedition, as he was accused of calling himself the "King of the Jews", which could be seen as a threat to Roman rule. However, Jesus was a pacifist and posed little threat to the Romans, as Pilate himself acknowledged.

Another theory is that Jesus was accused of being a magician or sorcerer, which was a serious offence under both Jewish and Roman law. His miracles, including raising Lazarus from the dead, may have been seen as a form of magic that threatened the public order. This theory is supported by the fact that the word "malefactor", used by the chief priests when bringing Jesus to Pilate, can be translated from the original Greek as "magician" or "sorcerer".

Regardless of the specific charges, Jesus's actions in the Temple clearly broke some form of civil law, leading to his arrest and conviction.

Jesus broke Sabbath laws

Jesus was accused of breaking Sabbath laws on multiple occasions. However, he did not break the Sabbath as outlined by God under the Old Covenant. Instead, he broke the Pharisees' interpretation of the law.

The Sabbath was given by God to the Israelites when he gave Moses the Ten Commandments. It was a day of rest, a sign of the Mosaic Covenant, and a time to focus on one's relationship with God. However, by the time of Jesus, the religious leaders had added many burdensome rules and traditions for keeping the Sabbath.

Jesus clashed with the Pharisees over their interpretation of the Sabbath. He performed several healings on the Sabbath, including healing Simon Peter's mother-in-law, a man with a withered hand, a man born blind, a crippled woman, a man with dropsy, a demon-possessed man, and a lame man. Each time, the Pharisees accused him of breaking the Sabbath law.

Jesus responded to these accusations by saying that he was working just as his Father was working. He also stated that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath, and that he was the Lord of the Sabbath. In doing so, Jesus proclaimed that he had authority over the laws that governed the Sabbath day.

Jesus did not break the Sabbath law as given by God. Instead, he broke the man-made traditions and regulations placed on the Sabbath by the Pharisees. By healing on the Sabbath, he showed God's goodness, revealed the Pharisees' hardness of heart, and gave a glimpse of the full healing from sin that would be made possible by his sacrifice on the cross.

Jesus' teachings challenged the Law of Moses

Jesus's teachings did challenge the Law of Moses, but he did not abolish the law—he fulfilled it. Jesus prioritised mercy and love over strict rule-following and legalism.

Jesus emphasised mercy and forgiveness over the strict following of religious laws and rules. For example, when religious leaders wanted to stone a woman caught in adultery, Jesus told them, "Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her" (John 8:7). Jesus forgave the woman and told her to "go and sin no more". This illustrates Christ's emphasis on compassion rather than condemnation.

Jesus also associated with society's outcasts, such as tax collectors, prostitutes, and Samaritans, much to the chagrin of religious elites, who viewed these people as unclean or sinful. Jesus cared more about showing grace and establishing connections than adhering to man-made religious standards.

Jesus prioritised the spirit of the law over the letter of the law. In multiple recorded debates with the Pharisees over the interpretation of the Law, Jesus showed more concern for the spirit or intention behind Moses' commands rather than just the letter of the law itself. For example, when the Pharisees challenged Christ over whether it was unlawful to heal people on the Sabbath (Luke 6:6-11), Jesus replied:

> "If any of you has a sheep and it falls into a pit on the Sabbath, will you not take hold of it and lift it out? How much more valuable is a person than a sheep! Therefore it is lawful to do good on the Sabbath" (Matthew 12:11-12).

His witty response cut through legalistic red tape to expose the heart of God's commandments—to love and care for people.

Jesus taught that religious rituals or duties were of secondary value compared to having the right heart motivations and attitudes. He berated the Pharisees for tithing spices but neglecting "the more important matters of the law—justice, mercy, and faithfulness" (Matthew 23:23).

Jesus's ethical teachings aligned with the core principles in the Law of Moses. When asked about the greatest commandment, Jesus replied:

> "Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbour as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments" (Matthew 22:37-40).

Jesus taught that all other commands flow from these two great commandments—to love God and love others. This echoed Deuteronomy 6:5 and Leviticus 19:18 in the Mosaic Law.

Jesus also challenged traditions and laws held by the Pharisees, such as the prohibition on picking grain on the Sabbath (Matthew 12:1-8) and the practice of ceremonial handwashing before meals (Mark 7:1-15).

In summary, while Jesus did not abolish the Law of Moses, he challenged and fulfilled it by prioritising love, mercy, and compassion over strict rule-following and legalism. He emphasised the spirit of the law over its letter, demonstrating that relationships and right heart motivations should take priority over rigid adherence to rules.

Jesus' actions led to introspection and shifts in Roman legal tradition

Jesus's actions and teachings introduced a new perspective on Roman law, prompting introspection and shifts in legal tradition. While Jesus himself did not seek to abolish the law, his interpretation of it brought about a new understanding.

Jesus's actions and teachings caused controversy among the religious elites of his time, the Pharisees and the Scribes, who accused him of breaking the Sabbath law and other Mosaic regulations. However, Jesus prioritised mercy, love, and righteousness over legalistic interpretations. This shift in perspective was not an abolition of the law but a call to its original spirit of deliverance and loving communion with God and others.

Jesus's reinterpretation of the law emphasised the spirit of compassion, mercy, and justice, forming the foundation of Christian teachings. This had a significant influence on the development of Christian jurisprudence and ethics, setting the platform for changes in societal norms and laws.

Jesus's execution under Roman law also led to introspection and shifts in Western legal tradition. His life, teachings, and death left an indelible mark on legal systems long after his time. While Jesus did not actively seek to "break" laws, his life and message had a profound influence on socio-religious norms and legal paradigms.

Frequently asked questions