Kennedy's Cuba Blockade: International Law Violation?

In October 1962, US President John F. Kennedy ordered a naval blockade of Cuba to prevent further Soviet shipments of nuclear missiles to the island. This action, known as the Cuban Missile Crisis, brought the world to the brink of nuclear war and raised questions about whether Kennedy's actions broke international law. The crisis was a direct confrontation between the US and the Soviet Union, with Cuba caught in the middle.

The blockade was in response to photographic evidence that the Soviets were constructing missile sites in Cuba, within striking distance of the US. Kennedy's administration had three options: negotiate with the Russians to remove the missiles, bomb the missile sites, or implement a naval blockade. Kennedy chose the blockade, deciding to bomb the sites only if further action was necessary.

The blockade began on October 21, and the next day, Kennedy addressed the American people, alerting them to the situation and calling on Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev to remove the missiles. The crisis escalated, and by October 28, the two leaders reached a settlement: the Cuban missile sites were dismantled, and Kennedy agreed to close US missile sites in Turkey.

The question of whether Kennedy broke international law is complex. While the blockade was referred to as a quarantine to avoid the legal implications of a state of war, it still amounted to a blockade, an act of war under international law. However, Kennedy's administration argued that the blockade was justified under the Rio Treaty for the defence of the Western Hemisphere. The ultimate outcome of the crisis was a secret agreement between Kennedy and Khrushchev to remove their respective missiles from Cuba and Turkey, de-escalating tensions and avoiding nuclear conflict.

Did Kennedy break international law with the blockade?

In October 1962, President John F. Kennedy ordered a naval blockade of Cuba to prevent further Soviet shipments of missiles to the island. This was in response to photographic evidence that the Soviets were building ballistic missile sites on the island, within striking distance of the United States.

The question of whether Kennedy broke international law with the blockade is complex and depends on several factors. Some argue that the blockade was, in fact, a legal "quarantine" rather than a blockade, which has different legal implications. Under international law, a blockade is considered an act of war, whereas a quarantine is more limited in scope and does not assume a state of war exists. By referring to the action as a quarantine, the Kennedy administration sought to avoid the formal implications of a state of war.

To further strengthen the legal basis for the quarantine, Kennedy obtained the approval of the Organization of American States (OAS) under the Rio Treaty for the defence of the Western Hemisphere. This treaty allowed for collective action by OAS members to defend against external threats.

However, it is important to note that the quarantine was still a significant restriction on the freedom of movement and trade, and some argue that it violated international law and the sovereignty of Cuba. The United Nations General Assembly has passed annual resolutions since 1992 condemning the ongoing US embargo against Cuba and stating that it violates the Charter of the United Nations and international law.

Ultimately, the determination of whether Kennedy broke international law with the blockade of Cuba is a matter of legal interpretation and remains a subject of debate among scholars and experts.

What were the consequences of the Cuban Missile Crisis?

The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a major confrontation that brought the United States and the Soviet Union to the brink of nuclear war. It was the moment when the two superpowers came closest to nuclear conflict. The crisis was unique in that it was primarily played out at the White House and Kremlin level, with relatively little input from the bureaucracies typically involved in foreign policy. It also marked a climax in an acutely antagonistic period in US-Soviet relations.

The immediate consequences of the Cuban Missile Crisis were:

• The removal of Soviet nuclear missiles from Cuba.
• The United States' commitment to never invade Cuba.
• The removal of US nuclear missiles from Turkey (this was done in secret).
• The establishment of a direct telephone link between the White House and the Kremlin, known as the "Hotline".
• The first steps towards a nuclear Test Ban Treaty.

The Cuban Missile Crisis also had wider consequences for US-Soviet relations and global politics:

• It played a significant role in Nikita Khrushchev's fall from power in 1964.
• It strengthened John F. Kennedy's image domestically and internationally.
• It contributed to the Soviet Union's determination to achieve nuclear parity with the United States.
• It led to a re-evaluation of the nuclear arms race by both superpowers.
• It resulted in the imposition of a full-scale US blockade against Cuba and the continuation of the US embargo on Cuba, which remains in place today.

What was the impact of the crisis on US-Cuba relations?

The Cuban Missile Crisis had a profound impact on US-Cuba relations, shaping the dynamics between the two nations for years to come.

The crisis marked a significant escalation in tensions between the US and Cuba, which had already been strained due to the Cuban Revolution, nationalization of US-owned assets, and Cuba's alignment with the Soviet Union. The discovery of Soviet nuclear missile sites in Cuba heightened US fears of a communist threat in its backyard and prompted a forceful response from the Kennedy administration.

The US imposed a naval blockade on Cuba, demanding the removal of Soviet missiles and signalling its willingness to use military force if necessary. This action represented a significant escalation and put the two countries on a path towards a potential military confrontation. The crisis also led to a breakdown in diplomatic relations, with the US and Cuba engaging in tense negotiations and exchanging threats.

The resolution of the Cuban Missile Crisis included a US commitment not to invade Cuba, which provided some level of stability to the region. However, the crisis also resulted in a deterioration of Cuba's relations with the Soviet Union, as Fidel Castro felt betrayed by the Soviets' retreat in the face of US demands. This dynamic further isolated Cuba and pushed it closer to the Soviet Union for support.

In the years following the crisis, US-Cuba relations remained cold and were characterised by economic sanctions, political isolation, and ongoing ideological differences. The US maintained comprehensive economic sanctions against Cuba, impacting all sectors of its economy. This included restrictions on trade, commerce, and financial transactions. The US also imposed travel restrictions on its citizens, limiting their ability to visit Cuba. These measures had a significant impact on Cuba's economy and the livelihoods of its people.

Despite efforts by subsequent US administrations to normalise relations, the legacy of the Cuban Missile Crisis continued to cast a shadow over US-Cuba relations. The crisis heightened mutual suspicions and reinforced the perception of Cuba as a security threat to the US. It also contributed to a prolonged period of political and economic isolation for Cuba, shaping its domestic and foreign policies.

How did the crisis influence the Cold War?

The Cuban Missile Crisis was a major event in the Cold War. It was a direct and dangerous confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union, and the moment when the two superpowers came closest to nuclear conflict. The crisis was unique in several ways, featuring miscalculations and secret communications between the two sides.

The crisis began when the US discovered evidence of a Soviet arms build-up on Cuba, including nuclear missile sites. In response, President Kennedy imposed a naval "quarantine" of Cuba, aiming to prevent the Soviets from bringing in more military supplies. He also demanded the removal of the missiles already there and the destruction of the sites. Kennedy's decision was a compromise between advisers who argued for an air strike and invasion of Cuba, and those who favoured stern warnings.

The crisis escalated when a US U-2 reconnaissance jet was shot down over Cuba. Kennedy and his advisers prepared for an attack on Cuba within days, while continuing to search for a diplomatic resolution. The leaders of both superpowers recognised the devastating possibility of nuclear war and eventually agreed to a deal. The Soviets would dismantle the missile sites in exchange for a US pledge not to invade Cuba. In a separate, secret deal, the US also agreed to remove its nuclear missiles from Turkey.

The Cuban Missile Crisis had several important outcomes. It strengthened Kennedy's image domestically and internationally, and may have mitigated negative world opinion following the failed Bay of Pigs invasion. It also led to the establishment of a direct telephone "Hotline" between the White House and the Kremlin, and the signing of the Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. The crisis brought the world to the brink of nuclear war and highlighted the dangers of the nuclear arms race, prompting both superpowers to take steps towards nuclear disarmament.

What was the role of the media in the crisis?

The media played a crucial role in the Cuban Missile Crisis, with journalists and news outlets on both sides of the conflict reporting on the rapidly escalating situation.

On October 20, 1962, the White House press corps was told that President John F. Kennedy had a cold. In reality, Kennedy was holding secret meetings with his advisors to decide on a response to the Soviet Union's construction of nuclear missile sites in Cuba. The media was kept in the dark about these meetings, with Kennedy's press secretary announcing that the president was resting and recovering from an "upper respiratory infection."

The following day, on October 21, Kennedy publicly addressed the nation, revealing the existence of the missile sites and calling on Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev to remove the missiles or face retaliation from the United States. This address marked a significant shift in the media narrative, as the American public and the world became aware of the growing tensions between the two superpowers.

Over the next six days, the media played a pivotal role in covering the rapidly unfolding events of the Cuban Missile Crisis. They reported on the back-and-forth negotiations between Kennedy and Khrushchev, which were conducted via telegram and letter. The media also covered the imposition of a naval blockade around Cuba by the United States, aimed at preventing the Soviets from bringing in more military supplies.

The media's role was not limited to just reporting the news; they also shaped public opinion and influenced the actions of the key players. For example, on October 31, Senator Kenneth Keating warned on the Senate floor that the Soviet Union was likely constructing a missile base in Cuba, citing information he had received from various sources, including Cuban exiles. This warning, amplified by the media, added to the sense of urgency and heightened tensions.

By October 28, Kennedy and Khrushchev had reached a settlement, and the media played a crucial role in communicating this resolution to the public. They reported on the terms of the agreement, which included the dismantling of the Cuban missile sites and Kennedy's pledge not to invade Cuba.

In the aftermath of the crisis, the media continued to play a role in shaping public perception and understanding of the events. This included analysing the decisions made by Kennedy and his advisors, such as their choice to implement a blockade instead of more aggressive options like air strikes or a full-scale invasion.

The media's coverage of the Cuban Missile Crisis had a significant impact on public opinion and helped shape the narrative of the conflict. Their reporting brought the world to the brink of global nuclear war, highlighting the crucial role of journalism in times of international crisis.

Frequently asked questions