Omorosa's Secret Tapes: Legal Or Not?

Omarosa Manigault Newman, a former White House aide, secretly recorded conversations with Donald Trump, his chief of staff, John Kelly, and other White House officials. She played these recordings on national television and used them to promote her book, Unhinged, which documents her time in the Trump administration. While the legality of her actions is uncertain, they have raised concerns about national security and the potential violation of a nondisclosure agreement. In response, the White House has criticised Manigault Newman's actions as a blatant disregard for national security.

Omarosa Manigault-Newman recorded John Kelly firing her

In August 2018, Omarosa Manigault-Newman, a former aide in the Trump administration, revealed that she had secretly recorded White House Chief of Staff John Kelly firing her in the White House Situation Room in December 2017. She played the recording on NBC's 'Meet the Press' and also released another recording in which former president Donald Trump seemed surprised by her dismissal.

In the recording, Kelly can be heard citing "significant integrity issues" as the reason for her firing, including the "use of government vehicles" and "money issues". Manigault-Newman took Kelly's suggestion of a smooth exit as a threat to her reputation. She also asked if Trump was aware of the situation, to which Kelly replied, "This is a non-negotiable discussion... this has to do with some pretty serious integrity violations".

The revelation caused controversy and raised questions about the legality and ethical implications of Manigault-Newman's actions. White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders criticised Manigault-Newman, stating that her actions showed a "blatant disregard for our national security". A White House official also noted that electronic devices were prohibited in the Situation Room.

Legal experts weighed in on the issue, with national security lawyer Bradley Moss noting that while Manigault-Newman's actions may not have incurred "obvious criminal liability", they would likely result in a violation that could deny her a security clearance in the future. The legality of such recordings varies across US states, with 38 states and the District of Columbia allowing them as long as one party to the conversation consents.

Newman's recordings were a security breach

Newman's recordings were made in the White House Situation Room, a secure location equipped with a protected communications system and typically used for managing domestic and foreign crises. Cell phones and other recording devices are prohibited in this room to prevent confidential discussions from being exposed to unauthorised individuals or entities.

By bringing a recording device into the Situation Room, Newman exposed the White House to potential counterintelligence risks. Bradley Moss, a national security lawyer, highlighted the possibility of foreign agencies hacking into the device and accessing not only the recorded conversations but also other conversations occurring in the vicinity of the device. This breach could have far-reaching implications, as noted by Juliette Kayyem, a former assistant secretary for intergovernmental affairs in the Department of Homeland Security. She emphasised that the perception of a compromised White House could extend beyond domestic concerns, with foreign entities such as the Chinese and Russians also potentially having access to sensitive information.

The White House press secretary, Sarah Sanders, strongly condemned Newman's actions, stating that "the very idea a staff member would sneak a recording device into the White House Situation Room shows a blatant disregard for our national security." The breach of security protocol and the potential exposure of confidential discussions underscore the severity of the situation and the risks associated with Newman's recordings.

Newman's actions were a violation of protocol

Omarosa Manigault Newman's actions were a violation of protocol. Newman, a former White House aide, secretly recorded conversations with Donald Trump, John Kelly, Lara Trump, and other staffers. She played these recordings on NBC's Meet the Press and Today program, and also used them to promote her book, Unhinged, in which she included claims that Trump used racial epithets.

Newman's actions are considered a violation of protocol and a betrayal of trust. They have also raised concerns about national security. Cellphones and other recording devices are prohibited in the White House Situation Room, where she recorded Kelly firing her, as they can be hacked by foreign agencies, posing a grave national security risk. This violation of protocol could have a chilling effect on internal discussions within the White House, hindering the ability of the president and future presidents to receive candid advice and make fully informed decisions.

Newman's actions have been criticized by White House press secretary Sarah Sanders, who called it a "blatant disregard for national security." Bradley Moss, a national security lawyer, also noted that it was unusual for a personnel meeting to take place in the Situation Room, suggesting that the White House may have suspected Newman of planning to record the meeting.

The recordings made by Newman are legal in 38 states and Washington, D.C., as these jurisdictions have one-party consent laws, meaning that only one party to a conversation needs to consent to the recording. However, the violation of protocol is likely to have consequences for Newman, such as being denied security clearance in the future if she wishes to work for the federal government again.

Newman's recordings were a national security risk

Newman Recordings: A National Security Risk

The secret recordings of Donald Trump and his chief of staff, John Kelly, by Omarosa Manigault Newman, a former White House aide, have raised serious concerns about national security. The recordings, made public by Newman, are a significant breach of security and have led to questions about the lack of a "security culture" in the Trump administration.

Newman's actions have been widely criticised by security experts and White House officials. Juliette Kayyem, a former assistant secretary for intergovernmental affairs in the Department of Homeland Security, pointed out that Trump's use of an unsecured phone and White House staffers working without security clearances were further examples of the administration's disregard for security protocols.

The recordings were made in the White House Situation Room, a highly secure area where cell phones and other recording devices are prohibited. Bradley Moss, a national security lawyer, noted that the use of a recording device in such a sensitive location presented counterintelligence risks. He explained that if a foreign agency hacked the device, all conversations within its range, not just those Newman chose to record, would be accessible to them. This concern was echoed by Kayyem, who stated that enemies like the Chinese and Russians could have access to sensitive information, compromising the entire White House.

The White House press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, strongly condemned Newman's actions, stating that "the very idea a staff member would sneak a recording device into the White House Situation Room shows a blatant disregard for our national security". The recordings have also drawn criticism from Trump's allies, including Ronna McDaniel, chairwoman of the Republican National Committee, who questioned the appropriateness of secretly recording the White House chief of staff in the Situation Room.

In conclusion, the Newman recordings have highlighted a concerning lack of security protocols within the Trump administration. The breach of security in one of the most secure areas of the White House has led to serious national security risks, with potentially sensitive information being exposed to foreign entities. This incident underscores the importance of strict security measures and the need for a strong "security culture" within government institutions.

Newman's recordings were a betrayal of trust

The recordings were seen as a security breach and raised questions about the lack of "security culture" in the Trump administration. Juliette Kayyem, a former assistant secretary for intergovernmental affairs in the Department of Homeland Security, pointed to the incident as an example of the Trump administration's disregard for security protocols. She noted instances such as White House staffers working without security clearances, Trump using an unsecured phone, and his 2017 dinner with the Japanese prime minister about North Korea at Mar-a-Lago.

Bradley Moss, a national security lawyer, also expressed concern about the potential counterintelligence risks posed by Newman's use of a recording device. He stated that all conversations, not just those Newman chose to record, could be "accessible to foreign entities" if the device were hacked by a foreign agency.

The White House press secretary, Sarah Sanders, condemned Newman's actions, stating that "the very idea that a staff member would sneak a recording device into the White House Situation Room shows a blatant disregard for our national security." She further added that Newman's decision to "brag about it on national television" demonstrated a "lack of character and integrity."

While the legality of Newman's recordings may vary depending on state wiretap laws, the act of secretly recording conversations in the White House Situation Room and then releasing them to the public was undoubtedly a breach of trust and a threat to national security.

Frequently asked questions