Did Pelosi Violate Any Laws?

In February 2020, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tore up a copy of President Donald Trump's State of the Union address. This action sparked outrage among Republicans, with some claiming that Pelosi had broken the law by destroying government records. However, legal experts unanimously disagreed with this claim, stating that Pelosi's copy of the speech was not a government record or official document and that she was therefore within her rights to do with it as she pleased. The original speech, which is considered a federal document, was submitted to the National Archives and cannot be destroyed.

Did Pelosi commit a federal crime?

In February 2020, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tore up a copy of President Donald Trump's State of the Union address. This action sparked outrage among Republicans, with some claiming that she had broken the law.

Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk wrote in a tweet that Pelosi "may have just committed a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2071, Section 2071 (a)", which is a federal law prohibiting the destruction of government records. Kirk's claim gained traction on social media, with several prominent figures repeating or retweeting it.

However, legal experts unanimously disagreed with Kirk's interpretation of the law. They clarified that the statute in question pertains to the concealment, removal, or mutilation of official government records in repositories like the National Archives. In this case, Pelosi's copy of Trump's speech was not an official government record. It was simply a copy provided to her before the address, similar to those given to the Vice President, members of Congress, and the media.

According to the Presidential and Federal Records Act amendments of 2014, duplicate copies of records kept for convenience or reference are not considered Federal records. Therefore, Pelosi's action, while controversial, did not violate any federal laws.

In conclusion, despite accusations from conservative pundits and politicians, legal experts agree that Nancy Pelosi did not commit a federal crime when she tore up President Trump's State of the Union address. Her copy of the speech was not an official government record, and she was well within her rights to dispose of it as she saw fit.

Was the speech an official document?

In 2020, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tore up a copy of President Donald Trump's State of the Union address. This action sparked outrage among Republicans, with some claiming that she had broken the law.

The claim that Pelosi broke the law centres on the argument that she violated 18 U.S.C. § 2071, which deals with the "concealment, removal, or mutilation" of government records. However, legal experts unanimously disagree with this claim.

The key question is whether the copy of the speech that Pelosi tore up can be considered a government record or official document. According to legal experts, the copy of the speech was not a government record. It was not "filed or deposited" with Pelosi, nor did she have "custody" of it in the legal sense. The speech was handed to her by Trump before he began speaking, and she followed along throughout. As Douglas Cox, a professor of law and expert in the laws governing the preservation of government records, stated, "Her copy of the State of the Union address is not a government record or government property at all, [it is] personal property."

Furthermore, under House rules, members of Congress are not legally required to retain their office's files. They can keep them private, destroy them, or rip them up. This is in contrast to presidential records, which are considered government property under the Presidential Records Act of 1978 and are required to be stored in the National Archives for safekeeping.

The purpose of the records law is to prevent the destruction of records in official repositories like the National Archives or courts. As Georgetown Law professor Victoria Nourse explained, "The point of the statute is to prevent people from destroying records in official repositories like the National Archives or in courts."

In conclusion, Pelosi's copy of the State of the Union address was not an official document or government record. Therefore, her decision to tear it up did not violate 18 U.S.C. § 2071 or any other law.

Did Pelosi violate 18 U.S.C. § 2071?

In February 2020, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tore up a copy of President Donald Trump's State of the Union address. This act sparked debate about whether Pelosi had violated 18 U.S.C. § 2071, a federal statute that prohibits the "concealment, removal, or mutilation" of government records.

Section 2071(a) states that anyone who "conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys" any government record "filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States" is subject to penalties. The statute also addresses individuals with "custody" of government records, prohibiting them from "willfully and unlawfully" engaging in similar actions.

Legal experts have weighed in on the matter, concluding that Pelosi did not violate 18 U.S.C. § 2071. They argue that the copy of Trump's speech that Pelosi tore up was not a government record. It was never officially "filed or deposited" with her, nor did she have legal "custody" of it. The speech was simply handed to her by Trump, and she was free to do with it as she pleased.

Furthermore, the purpose of the statute is to prevent the destruction of records in official repositories, such as the National Archives, which does not apply to Pelosi's actions. The State of the Union address is considered a presidential record and must be submitted to the National Archives for safekeeping under the Presidential Records Act. Pelosi's copy was not the official record and therefore did not violate the statute.

In summary, while Pelosi's actions may have been controversial, they did not violate 18 U.S.C. § 2071. Her copy of the State of the Union address was not an official government record, and her actions did not prevent future generations from accessing the address.

What was the ethical debate surrounding Pelosi's actions?

While House Speaker Nancy Pelosi did not break the law when she tore up a copy of President Donald Trump's State of the Union address, her actions sparked an ethical debate about the appropriateness of her conduct.

Some people, including President Trump himself, believed that Pelosi's actions were inappropriate and disrespectful. Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) filed an ethics complaint against Pelosi, arguing that her "conduct was beneath the dignity of the House, and a potential violation of law (18 USC 2071)." Gaetz echoed Pelosi's own words about the president, saying, "nobody is above the law. She must be held accountable."

On the other hand, others may argue that Pelosi's actions were a form of political expression and a way to express her disagreement with the President's message. In an interview with reporters after the event, Pelosi stated that she ripped up the copy "because it was a manifesto of mistruths."

The debate surrounding Pelosi's actions highlights the tension between the legal and ethical implications of a public official's conduct. While she did not break any laws, the ethical implications of her actions are more subjective and open to interpretation. Some may view her actions as a breach of decorum and respect, while others may see them as a justified form of political expression.

This incident also raises questions about the role of public officials in upholding certain standards of behaviour and the potential consequences for deviating from those standards, even if no laws are broken. The filing of an ethics complaint against Pelosi by Congressman Gaetz further underscores the complexity of this issue, as it involves navigating the boundaries of acceptable conduct for elected representatives.

What did legal experts say about Pelosi's actions?

Several legal experts weighed in on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's actions, where she tore up a copy of President Donald Trump's 2020 State of the Union address. The consensus among these experts was that Pelosi did not violate any laws.

Heidi Kitrosser, a law professor at the University of Minnesota, stated that it was "absurd to suggest that Pelosi can be prosecuted" for tearing up what was likely a printout of Trump's speech. She added that Pelosi could do whatever she pleased with the printout.

Douglas Cox, a professor of law at the City of New York University School of Law and an expert in the laws governing the preservation of government records, agreed that Pelosi's copy of the State of the Union address was not a government record or government property. Instead, it was considered personal property. Cox highlighted that members of Congress are not legally required to retain their office's files and can choose to keep them private, destroy them, or rip them up.

Victoria Nourse, a professor of law at Georgetown Law, clarified that the State of the Union is a presidential record that must be submitted to the National Archives under the Presidential Records Act. However, Pelosi did not mutilate the record that is filed with the Archives. Nourse emphasized that if the statute were interpreted differently, no copy of the State of the Union could ever be destroyed.

Kathleen Clark, a professor of law at Washington University in St. Louis, supported this view, explaining that the purpose of the records law is to prevent the government from being deprived of its documents. Pelosi's action did not fit within the statute as there were countless copies of Trump's address, including the version posted online by the White House.

Gerald Treece, a legal expert from KHOU 11 News and a professor of law at South Texas College of Law Houston, provided additional context. He explained that code 2071, which was referenced in the social media claims against Pelosi, pertains to the "concealment, removal, or mutilation generally" of official U.S. records and/or documents. However, Pelosi shredded a copy of the President's speech, similar to the copies provided to the Vice President, members of Congress, and the media. The original speech submitted to the National Archives is the official record and cannot be destroyed.

Frequently asked questions