Trump's Weather Map Scandal: Law Broken?

On September 4, 2019, Donald Trump displayed a map of Hurricane Dorian's projected path, which appeared to have been altered with a Sharpie to extend the hurricane's path into Alabama. This was contrary to the National Weather Service's official forecast, which stated that Alabama would not be impacted. Trump's alteration of the map sparked accusations of spreading fake news and potentially breaking a federal law prohibiting the publication of falsified official weather forecasts. The relevant US Code states that anyone who knowingly issues or publishes any counterfeit weather forecast may be fined or imprisoned. Trump denied knowledge of the alteration and stood by his claim that Alabama was initially in the hurricane's path. The incident, dubbed Sharpiegate, caused uproar on social media and raised questions about the legality of altering official weather forecasts.

Trump's false claims about Hurricane Dorian hitting Alabama

On September 1, 2019, then-US President Donald Trump falsely claimed in a tweet that Alabama would be one of several states to be hit "much harder than anticipated" by Hurricane Dorian. The National Weather Service (NWS) quickly refuted this, stating that Alabama would not be impacted by the hurricane. However, Trump refused to admit his mistake and continued to insist that Alabama was in the storm's path.

On September 4, during a briefing on Hurricane Dorian in the Oval Office, Trump displayed a map of the hurricane's projected path, which had been altered with a black marker to extend the hurricane's path into Alabama. This map caused controversy and led to accusations that Trump had doctored the map himself to justify his false claims. The incident was dubbed "Sharpiegate" on social media.

Trump denied altering the map and insisted that his original briefings showed a "95% chance probability" that Alabama would be hit. He also shared an outdated forecast map from August 28, which showed Dorian touching Alabama, to support his claim.

It is against US law to publish a falsified official weather forecast. The 1948 regulation on false weather reports states that anyone who "knowingly issues or publishes any counterfeit weather forecast or warning of weather conditions" while falsely representing it as an official government forecast can be fined or imprisoned for up to 90 days.

While it is unclear if anyone has been prosecuted under this law, some legal experts argued that Trump may have broken the law by altering the map and presenting it as an official forecast. However, others doubted that he would face any consequences for his actions.

The controversy surrounding Trump's false claims about Hurricane Dorian impacting Alabama highlighted the importance of accurate and reliable weather information, especially during a potentially dangerous natural disaster. It also raised questions about the consequences of spreading misinformation by public officials.

The legality of altering a weather map

On September 4, 2019, then-President Donald Trump displayed a map of Hurricane Dorian's projected path, which appeared to have been altered with a Sharpie to extend the hurricane's path from Florida to Alabama. This was contrary to the National Hurricane Center's forecast, which did not include Alabama. The incident, dubbed "Sharpiegate", raised questions about the legality of altering a weather map.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 2074, it is illegal to "knowingly issue or publish any counterfeit weather forecast or warning of weather conditions" while falsely claiming that it was issued by the Weather Bureau, the United States Signal Service, or another government service. The law states that violators "shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ninety days, or both." This law has been in place since 1948 and is designed to prevent false weather information from being disseminated as it could have serious consequences for those in the path of a hurricane.

In the case of Trump's altered map, it is unclear who made the alteration. Trump denied knowledge of the alteration and insisted that his original briefings showed a "95% chance probability" that Alabama would be hit. However, the National Weather Service maintained that Alabama would not be impacted by the hurricane.

The potential violation of federal law by altering a weather map underscores the importance of accurate and reliable weather information, especially during potentially dangerous weather events such as hurricanes. While it is unclear if any legal consequences resulted from "Sharpiegate," it highlights the responsibility of those in positions of power to provide accurate and timely information to the public during critical situations.

The 1948 regulation on false weather reports

On September 4, 2019, then-President Donald Trump held up a map of Hurricane Dorian's projected path, which included an extension drawn with a Sharpie pen to show the storm hitting Alabama. This appeared to be an attempt to defend an incorrect tweet he had posted a few days earlier, claiming that Alabama was one of the states in the path of the hurricane.

This action led to questions about whether Trump had broken the law by altering the map. The 1948 regulation on false weather reports, which is part of U.S. law, states:

> "Whoever knowingly issues or publishes any counterfeit weather forecast or warning of weather conditions falsely representing such forecast or warning to have been issued or published by the Weather Bureau, United States Signal Service, or other branch of the Government service, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ninety days, or both."

This regulation, which is still in effect today, makes it clear that publishing falsified official weather forecasts is illegal. The law applies to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Weather Service (NWS), which is the government agency responsible for providing weather forecasts and reports across the country.

The commercial opportunities in weather forecasting have increased significantly with technological advancements and the impact of climate change, leading to a rise in independent weather agencies. While the National Weather Service faces new challenges due to this increased competition, the 1948 regulation on false weather reports remains crucial for maintaining public trust in official weather forecasts during hurricane season.

The potential consequences of Trump's actions

Trump's actions could have had significant impacts on public trust in official weather forecasts and the government more broadly. By providing false or misleading information about Hurricane Dorian's path, Trump may have caused confusion and uncertainty among the public, potentially endangering those in the storm's path who relied on his statements. This could have led to a loss of confidence in the National Weather Service and other government agencies, as well as a broader erosion of trust in the government's ability to provide accurate and reliable information during emergencies.

Furthermore, Trump's actions could have had economic consequences. As noted by Kristine C. Harper, a professor of history at Florida State University, business owners in Alabama may have incurred financial losses by closing down in anticipation of the storm, believing it to be on a path to hit their state. This could have led to calls for financial reimbursement or compensation, creating further economic fallout.

Trump's refusal to admit his mistake and insistence on doubling down on his false claims also set a dangerous precedent and undermined the integrity of the presidency. His actions could have emboldened others to spread misinformation or disregard official forecasts, potentially putting lives at risk during future weather events.

Overall, the potential consequences of Trump's actions extended beyond legal ramifications, impacting public trust, economic stability, and the integrity of the office he held.

The role of the media in covering the scandal

The media played a crucial role in covering the "Sharpiegate" scandal, which involved allegations that then-President Donald Trump altered a weather map with a Sharpie marker to include Alabama in the path of Hurricane Dorian. This incident sparked widespread media attention and debate, with many news outlets questioning the legality of Trump's actions and their potential implications.

News outlets such as The Washington Post, The Guardian, TIME, Newsweek, and UNILAD extensively covered the story, highlighting the discrepancies between Trump's claims and the official forecasts from the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and the National Weather Service (NWS). They also brought in legal experts and referenced relevant laws, such as 18 U.S. Code § 2074, to discuss the potential legal consequences of altering a weather map, which could be considered a "counterfeit weather forecast" under U.S. law.

Social media platforms, particularly Twitter, played a significant role in amplifying the scandal. Users accused Trump of creating "fake news" and spreading misinformation, even using the hashtag #Sharpiegate to mock the situation. This online backlash gained significant traction and further pressured the media to scrutinize the incident.

Some media outlets also provided updates on the hurricane's impact and the subsequent evacuation efforts along the U.S. East Coast, ensuring that the public remained informed about the storm's progression despite the controversy surrounding Trump's remarks.

Overall, the media's coverage of the scandal involved fact-checking the president's statements, analyzing the potential legal ramifications, engaging in social media discourse, and continuing to provide critical information to the public about the hurricane's trajectory and the associated risks.

Frequently asked questions