Trump's Stormy Daniels Lies: Legally Safe?

In 2025, Donald Trump became the first US president to face criminal sentencing while preparing to take office. The charges against him were related to hush money payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election campaign. Daniels alleged that she had a sexual encounter with Trump in 2006, which he denied. Trump was convicted of falsifying business records tied to payments made to Daniels, which were facilitated by his former lawyer, Michael Cohen. While hush money payments are not inherently illegal, they can be illegal if they are used to cover up a crime or if the agreement is non-consensual. In this case, Trump was not charged with making the payments but with falsifying business records, as the payments to Cohen were disguised as legal fees. Trump received an unconditional discharge, meaning he will not be punished with jail time, fines, or other conditions. However, he will have felony convictions on his criminal record.

Did Trump's hush money payment to Stormy Daniels break the law?

In 2025, former US President Donald Trump was sentenced in a New York hush-money case, becoming the first US president to face criminal sentencing while preparing to take office. The case centred on allegations that Trump falsified business records to conceal a $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election. Daniels testified about a 2006 encounter with Trump, which he has denied.

While "hush money" payments are not inherently illegal, they can be illegal if they are used to cover up a crime or if the agreement is non-consensual, such as in cases of blackmail or bribery. In Trump's case, he was not charged with making or reimbursing the payment but was instead indicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records. The payment to Daniels was listed in the business records as a legal expense payable to Michael Cohen, Trump's former lawyer who facilitated the transaction, whereas the indictment alleged that they were actually to reimburse Cohen for the earlier, allegedly illicit, payment to Daniels.

Trump pleaded not guilty to the charges and characterised the case as a "witch hunt". However, he was convicted on all 34 counts, becoming the first US president to be convicted of a felony. On January 10, 2025, Trump was handed an unconditional discharge, which means that he will not be punished with prison time, fines, or any other conditions. This outcome was influenced by the fact that Trump was about to take office and would be afforded legal protections as the president.

Did Trump's lies about Stormy Daniels amount to election fraud?

In 2025, former US President Donald Trump was sentenced in a New York hush-money case, becoming the first US president to face criminal sentencing while preparing to take office. The case centred on allegations that Trump falsified business records to conceal a $130,000 payment to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election.

Daniels testified about a 2006 sexual encounter with Trump, which he has denied. The payments were facilitated by Trump's former attorney, Michael Cohen, who was jailed on multiple charges, including tax evasion and breaking campaign finance rules related to the Daniels payment.

Trump was convicted of 34 felony counts of falsifying business records and given an unconditional discharge, meaning no punishment, fine, or conditions were imposed. This was due to Trump's upcoming presidential term and the legal protections afforded to the office of the US President.

While the hush-money payment itself is not illegal, prosecutors argued that the way Daniels was paid—right before the 2016 election—amounted to campaign finance crimes. They also alleged that Trump's intent in falsifying the records was to commit or conceal other crimes, including Cohen's campaign finance crimes and tax issues.

However, it is unclear whether Trump's lies about Stormy Daniels specifically amounted to election fraud. While his actions may have influenced the outcome of the 2016 election, they do not appear to fit the legal definition of election fraud, which typically involves deliberate deception or fraud to influence the result of an election.

Trump's case highlights the complex interplay between politics and the law, and the challenges of holding powerful individuals accountable for their actions.

Did Trump's lies about Stormy Daniels constitute a violation of federal campaign finance limits?

In 2025, former US President Donald Trump was sentenced in a New York hush-money case, becoming the first US president to face criminal sentencing while preparing to take office. Trump was convicted of falsifying records tied to payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election. Daniels testified about a 2006 encounter with Trump, which he has denied, while the payments were facilitated by Trump's former attorney Michael Cohen.

The Manhattan District Attorney (DA), Alvin Bragg, accused Trump of falsifying business records to conceal payments made to Daniels as hush money to buy her silence over a sexual encounter between them. The indictment included 34 felony counts of falsifying business records to conceal a $420,000 payment to Daniels. The prosecution argued that Trump's 2016 campaign benefited from the payment to Daniels through Cohen, who was reimbursed via a false retainer agreement.

Trump's lawyers argued that he was unaware of any unlawful scheme and that Cohen was an unreliable witness. They also claimed that the retainer agreement between Trump and Cohen was valid. Trump himself has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and has called the case a "witch hunt."

Ultimately, Trump received an unconditional discharge, which means that he will not face any punishment, fine, or conditions for his conviction. This outcome was based on Trump's status as a first-time offender and the "extraordinary" legal protections afforded to the office of the President of the United States. However, the conviction stands, and Trump is expected to appeal.

While the act of paying hush money is not inherently illegal, the way in which the payment to Daniels was structured and accounted for has raised legal questions. Specifically, the issue of whether Trump's lies about the payment constitute a violation of federal campaign finance limits has been a subject of debate.

In the case of People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump, the prosecution argued that Trump's actions violated federal campaign finance limits, among other charges. They asserted that the payment to Daniels constituted a campaign finance crime because it exceeded the legal limit on political contributions. This argument was based on the timing of the payment, which occurred just before the 2016 election, and the intention behind it, which was allegedly to influence the election outcome.

On the other hand, Trump's defence team denied any violation of campaign finance limits. They argued that the payment to Daniels was a personal matter and not related to the campaign. They also claimed that Trump was unaware of any unlawful scheme and that the retainer agreement with Cohen was valid. Additionally, they questioned the reliability of Cohen as a witness, given his history of making contradictory statements.

The judge in the case, Juan Merchan, did not explicitly rule on the issue of campaign finance limits violation. However, he acknowledged the seriousness of the charges and the potential harm to society. He also noted that the unique circumstances of the case, including Trump's position as a former and incoming President, played a role in the sentencing decision.

In conclusion, while Trump's lies about Stormy Daniels did raise questions about potential violations of federal campaign finance limits, the final ruling did not provide a clear answer. The prosecution's arguments were not directly addressed in the judge's sentencing decision, and the focus remained on the falsification of business records and the associated charges.

Did Trump's lies about Stormy Daniels influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election?

The Stormy Daniels–Donald Trump scandal involves an alleged one-night sexual encounter between businessman and later U.S. president Donald Trump and pornographic film actress Stormy Daniels in 2006. The scandal involves a conspiracy on the part of Trump to cover up the story in the month prior to the 2016 U.S. presidential election, and Trump's falsification of business records as part of the conspiracy.

In 2018, The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump's former attorney Michael Cohen paid Daniels $130,000 as hush money to buy her silence during the 2016 Trump campaign. After the story broke, Cohen voluntarily cooperated with federal investigators and admitted that the payment to Daniels was an illegal contribution to Trump's campaign intended to influence the election. Cohen pleaded guilty to this and other crimes and was sentenced to three years in prison.

In April 2024, prosecutors alleged that Trump tried to 'corrupt' the 2016 election, as his hush money trial got underway. In May 2024, Trump was on trial over charges stemming from the hush-money payment to Daniels. He was the first former US president to stand trial. Daniels shared the details of their alleged sexual encounter in court while Trump sat several feet away.

Daniels claims she accepted $130,000 from Cohen before the 2016 election in exchange for her silence about the encounter. She says she took the money because she was concerned for the safety of her family, and that she was legally and physically threatened to stay silent. In 2011, as Trump began exploring a potential presidential bid, Daniels considered selling the story to a celebrity magazine for $15,000. As part of the negotiation, Daniels was interviewed and the magazine asked the Trump Organization for comment. In response, Trump's lawyer Cohen threatened litigation and the magazine decided not to publish Daniels's story.

In August 2015, a meeting allegedly took place between Trump, Cohen, and David Pecker, owner of American Media, Inc (AMI), which published the National Enquirer. In April 2024, Pecker testified under oath that he agreed to help Trump's campaign by publishing positive stories about Trump and negative stories about his opponents.

In October 2015, Pecker learned that a former Trump Tower doorman was trying to sell information that Trump had fathered a child out of wedlock. At the CEO's direction, AMI negotiated and signed an agreement to pay the doorman $30,000 in exchange for acquiring exclusive rights to the story. AMI later determined the story was not true but instructed Pecker to purchase the story anyway so it would not be published elsewhere before the 2016 election.

In August 2015, the National Enquirer's editor-in-chief contacted Cohen about a woman, believed to be Playboy model Karen McDougal, who alleged she had a sexual relationship with Trump while he was married. Cohen was updated by the National Enquirer about this regularly over text and by phone. Trump allegedly did not want this information to become public because he was concerned about its impact on his campaign. AMI ultimately paid McDougal $150,000 in exchange for her not speaking out on the alleged sexual relationship.

In October 2016, shortly after the "Access Hollywood" tape was released, the National Enquirer alerted Cohen that Daniels was agitating to go public with her claims of a sexual encounter with Trump in 2006. At Trump's direction, Cohen negotiated a deal to buy Daniels's story in order to prevent American voters from learning that information before Election Day. Cohen opened a bank account for the LLC and wired $130,000 into the LLC's account. Cohen corresponded with the bank using his Trump Organization email account and representing himself as "Special Counsel to Donald J. Trump".

In January 2018, The Wall Street Journal reported that Cohen paid Daniels $130,000 in October 2016, a month before the election, to stop her discussing the alleged affair. Cohen denied the existence of the affair on behalf of his client, Trump, but acknowledged a month later that he had paid Daniels $130,000. Daniels filed a lawsuit against Trump, claiming that the non-disclosure agreement she signed about the alleged affair was invalid since Trump never personally signed it despite acknowledging that she accepted the payment made in exchange for her silence in the matter.

In March 2018, NBC News reported that Cohen initiated an ex parte private arbitration case against Daniels and obtained a restraining order barring her from disclosing "confidential information" related to the NDA agreement. White House press secretary Sarah Sanders said that President Trump's personal attorneys won an arbitration case "in the President's favor" against Daniels, and "there was no knowledge of any payments [to Daniels] from the President".

In April 2018, FBI agents raided Cohen's office and seized emails, tax documents, and business records relating to several matters, including payments to Daniels. In August 2018, Cohen pleaded guilty to eight criminal charges, including a campaign finance violation for Daniels's payment. He stated under oath that he paid her "in coordination with and at the direction of a candidate for federal office". Cohen was sentenced to three years in federal prison on various charges, and was disbarred.

In May 2024, a New York jury found Trump guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records to conceal the reimbursement payments to Daniels. In July 2024, Trump was sentenced to an unconditional discharge—without prison, fines or probation—out of respect for the presidential immunity doctrine.

Did Trump's lies about Stormy Daniels amount to tax fraud?

While Trump's lies about Stormy Daniels did not amount to tax fraud, they did result in him being convicted of 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. The charges were related to hush money paid to adult film actress Stormy Daniels to keep quiet about an alleged affair in the lead-up to the 2016 election, which Trump won.

The trial, which lasted six weeks, centred on a reimbursement Trump made to his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, who claimed he paid Daniels $130,000 at Trump's direction and with his assurance that he would be repaid. While hush-money payments are not illegal, the Manhattan District Attorney's Office alleged that Trump committed a crime by improperly recording the money used to reimburse Cohen as legal expenses. They further accused him of falsifying business records to conceal a second crime – a violation of state election law.

Trump pleaded not guilty, arguing that the allegations he faced were not criminal, and repeatedly alleged, without evidence, that Democrats had orchestrated the trial to negatively affect his presidential bid. However, a jury found him guilty of all 34 counts, and he was sentenced to an unconditional discharge, meaning he will not be punished with prison time, fines, or community service.

Frequently asked questions