The Bar's Takeover: Law Firm Suits And Drinks

In the final season of the TV show *Suits*, the narrative device of a state bar association taking over a law firm due to legal misconduct is used to create an arc for the storyline. This plot point has left viewers confused about whether such a takeover is possible in real life. While there are laws that prevent certain actions, there is no specific law that states that an entity can take over a law firm. In reality, bar associations lack the authority to take over a law firm, and there is no precedent for this happening.

Can a bar association change the managing partner of a law firm?

The management of a law firm is a complex issue that varies across different states and jurisdictions. While traditionally, lawyers would remain with the same firm throughout their career, this career trajectory is now becoming rare, with lawyers frequently changing firms and positions. This has led to an increase in "lateral partner moves" and a growing number of non-lawyers taking on management roles in law firms.

In terms of a bar association's ability to change the managing partner of a law firm, this power is generally not held by the bar, but instead, it is an internal decision made by the firm's partners. That being said, bar associations do have certain powers and responsibilities regarding the ethical conduct of lawyers and law firms, which can influence the management structure of a firm. For example, the New York City Bar Association has outlined ethical obligations that lawyers must adhere to when changing firms, including the duty to inform clients and the current firm of their departure and refrain from soliciting other attorneys or staff before giving notice.

Additionally, while most jurisdictions were reluctant to allow non-lawyers to manage law firms, this stance has softened in recent years. Some states, like Utah and Arizona, have amended Rule 5.4 to allow non-lawyer ownership and management of law firms, as long as they are not directly involved in legal practice and do not have voting rights. However, the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct still prohibit non-lawyers from having managerial authority over law firms practising law, and most states uphold this rule.

In summary, while bar associations do not directly change the managing partner of a law firm, their ethical guidelines and regulations can influence the qualifications and conduct of those in management positions. The management structure of a law firm is primarily governed by internal firm policies and state-specific laws regarding lawyer and non-lawyer involvement in ownership and management.

Is there a real-life precedent for this?

While there is no direct mention of a bar taking over a law firm in real life, there are certain scenarios that might lead to such an outcome. State regulations for law firms are crucial, and non-compliance with these regulations can have serious consequences. For instance, in the case of advertising, if a state bar association determines that a law firm has violated the rules of professional conduct in its advertising, the firm may face professional censure or even suspension of its license to practice law.

Additionally, there are federal laws and state-specific laws that relate to legal marketing that law firms must adhere to. These laws dictate what law firms can and cannot display on their websites, blogs, or any other marketing content. Law firms must also be mindful of the specific restrictions their state applies to lawyer marketing efforts. The American Bar Association, for example, considers a law firm's website as advertising and has laid out guidelines for compliance.

It is worth noting that before 1976, legal advertising was forbidden. However, this was overturned, and today, law firms must navigate the complex landscape of state-specific regulations while also adhering to federal laws. While a complete takeover of a law firm by a bar may not be a common or direct consequence, the potential for regulatory intervention and the imposition of penalties for non-compliance are very real. Law firms must, therefore, exercise caution and stay informed about the applicable laws and regulations to avoid facing disciplinary actions.

What is the role of a Special Master?

In the federal judiciary of the United States, a special master is an adjunct to a federal court. Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a federal court to appoint a special master, with the consent of the parties, to conduct proceedings and report to the Court. The role of the special master, who is frequently but not necessarily an attorney, is to supervise those falling under the order of the court to ensure that the court order is being followed and to report on the activities of the entity being supervised in a timely manner to the judge or the judge's designated representatives. Special masters have been controversial in some cases, and are cited by critics as an example of judicial overreach.

Special masters are appointed by the courts on behalf of a client. They can receive evidence, conduct hearings, take witness testimony, issue orders, and prepare reports for the presiding judge. The parameters of their authority are set forth in a court order. A special master may be selected on the basis of their expertise. They are most commonly used in complex antitrust and tort litigation to manage discovery-related disputes. Special masters often play crucial roles in original jurisdiction cases decided by the Supreme Court, especially in disputes involving state boundaries.

Special masters are frequently appointed as facilitators in child custody cases, where they help manage disputes and ensure compliance with custody arrangements. The United States Court of Federal Claims operates an Office of Special Masters, informally known as the vaccine court, to resolve claims under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Cases involving special masters often involve situations in which it has been shown that governmental entities are violating civil rights.

In some cases, special masters resolve questions of geography or historical claims. For example, in U.S. v. Microsoft, Judge Jackson appointed Professor Lawrence Lessig as a special master to advise the court about technical issues and investigate certain claims. Occasionally, judges may appoint a special master to attend a deposition in a remote, non-courthouse location and make evidentiary rulings on the spot, ensuring the deposition proceeds smoothly.

Can a fraud convict join the bar?

While it is challenging to become a lawyer with a fraud conviction, it is not impossible. The requirements to practice law vary across different states and territories, and only some explicitly forbid people with fraud convictions from becoming lawyers. For example, as of 2015, Kansas, Mississippi, Texas, and the Northern Mariana Islands outright banned convicted felons from becoming lawyers. On the other hand, Oregon allows people with felony convictions to become lawyers unless they have committed a crime for which a lawyer could be disbarred.

Even in states that do not ban people with fraud convictions from becoming lawyers, there are often additional challenges to gaining admission to the bar. For example, applicants with a criminal record may need to prove their rehabilitation and good moral character. This may involve providing evidence of a law-abiding life since their conviction, such as completing educational programs, maintaining steady employment, staying involved in the community, and avoiding further criminal activity. Additionally, applicants may need to provide court records, letters from probation officers, or other documents related to their conviction to show transparency and responsibility.

Some states may also require applicants to have their civil rights fully restored before practicing law. This may involve getting a conviction pardoned or expunged, which can improve an applicant's chances of passing the character and fitness evaluation. It is important for applicants to be honest and truthful when completing their law school and bar applications, as dishonesty can significantly harm their chances of admission.

While it may be challenging, people with fraud convictions can become lawyers in many states by demonstrating their rehabilitation and commitment to ethical standards. It is important to research the specific requirements of the state in which one plans to apply for bar admission.

What is the role of the bar association?

A bar association is a professional association of lawyers, generally organized in countries following Anglo-American types of jurisprudence. The word "bar" refers to the old English/European custom of using a physical railing to separate the area in which court or legal profession business is done from the viewing area for the general public or students of the law. In many Commonwealth jurisdictions, the bar association comprises lawyers who are qualified as barristers or advocates, while the "'law society'" comprises solicitors.

In the United States, admission to the bar is permission granted by a particular court system for a lawyer to practice law in that system. This is distinct from membership in a bar association, although some states require membership in the state bar association for all attorneys. The American Bar Association (ABA) is the largest voluntary association of lawyers and legal professionals in the world. The ABA works to promote the best quality legal education, competence, ethical conduct, and professionalism in the legal profession. It also provides practical resources for legal professionals, accredits law schools, and establishes model ethical codes.

In other countries, such as India and Pakistan, there are various local and national bar associations that lawyers can join for reasons of recognition and access to facilities. For example, in Pakistan, a person must fulfill certain requirements, including obtaining a valid law degree from a recognized university, to become a licensee of a Provincial Bar Council and join a bar association. In Sri Lanka, attorneys may opt to become members of the Bar Association of Sri Lanka after completing law exams and spending a period of time working under a practicing attorney.

Membership in bar associations may be mandatory or optional for practicing attorneys, depending on the jurisdiction. Bar associations may be responsible for regulating the legal profession in their jurisdiction, serving as professional organizations dedicated to their members, or both. Lawyers who violate the standards of the state bar association may face professional consequences, including being liable for legal malpractice and even being disbarred, resulting in the loss of their license to practice law.

Frequently asked questions