Abortion Laws: Stillbirth Removal's Legal Hurdle

The recent overturning of Roe v. Wade in the US has brought abortion laws into sharp focus. The Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization in 2022 has resulted in 14 states banning abortion, with several more limiting it to early in pregnancy. These abortion bans and restrictions also impact the care available to people experiencing a miscarriage or stillbirth, as the medical treatments for pregnancy loss are often the same medications and procedures used for abortions. This has resulted in several cases of women experiencing health-threatening situations, yet being unable to obtain medical treatment until their lives were at risk. The threat of criminalization and penalties for clinicians who provide abortions in states with bans has created a chilling effect on clinical care, with concerns that abortion restrictions create a medical and legal environment that exacerbates health inequities, particularly for people of colour.

Abortion bans may limit treatment options for those experiencing a stillbirth

Abortion bans can have a significant impact on individuals experiencing a stillbirth, limiting their treatment options and potentially affecting their health and well-being. The medical interventions used to manage stillbirths often overlap with those used in abortions, and restrictive abortion laws can create challenges for those seeking necessary care.

Understanding Stillbirth and Treatment Options

Stillbirth refers to the loss of a pregnancy at or after 20 weeks of gestation, affecting about 1 in 175 pregnancies in the United States each year. Common causes include infections, birth defects, and pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia. When faced with a stillbirth, individuals have several options for giving birth, including dilation and evacuation (D&E), inducing labor, or undergoing a Cesarean section (C-section).

The Impact of Abortion Bans on Stillbirth Treatment

Abortion bans enacted by certain states can directly impact the treatment options available for individuals experiencing a stillbirth. Many of the medical treatments for stillbirth are the same medications and procedures used for abortion care. As a result, abortion restrictions may limit the range of treatment options for those experiencing a stillbirth, even when their health is at risk.

Clinical Challenges and Patient Safety

Clinicians practicing in states with abortion bans face challenges in providing standard care for miscarriages and pregnancy-related emergencies. They may be concerned about civil or criminal penalties associated with violating abortion bans, which can lead to delays in treatment for patients experiencing stillbirths. This can have serious consequences, especially when a patient's health is already compromised.

Addressing Health Disparities

It is important to note that abortion bans and restrictions may disproportionately affect certain populations, particularly people of color. Health disparities and structural racism contribute to higher rates of stillbirth among Black and Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander women. Abortion bans and restrictive policies may further exacerbate these inequities, creating barriers to accessing timely and necessary medical care.

Navigating Legal Complexities

State abortion bans often include limited exceptions, such as threats to the life or health of the pregnant person. However, the legal standards for these exceptions vary, and clinicians may be uncertain about when they can provide treatment without legal repercussions. This ambiguity can lead to further delays in care and negatively impact patient-provider relationships.

In conclusion, abortion bans have far-reaching consequences that extend beyond abortion care. For individuals experiencing a stillbirth, these bans can limit their treatment options, compromise their health, and contribute to existing health disparities. It is crucial to recognize the intersection of abortion laws, healthcare access, and patient safety to ensure that individuals facing stillbirth have the necessary support and resources during a difficult and traumatic time.

The impact of abortion bans is felt most by marginalised groups

Abortion laws have a significant impact on marginalised groups, and this impact has only been exacerbated by the US Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. This ruling has resulted in a wave of new abortion restrictions and bans, disproportionately affecting those who are already vulnerable. Marginalised groups, including people of colour and low-income individuals, now face even greater challenges in accessing safe abortions, with far-reaching consequences for their health, financial stability, and overall well-being.

People of colour, particularly Black women, have historically faced systemic racism and inequality in the American healthcare system. Abortion bans further compound these issues, as they are more likely to live in states with restrictive abortion laws and have higher rates of pregnancy loss and maternal mortality. The denial of bodily autonomy and reproductive rights adds to the existing injustices endured by these communities.

Low-income individuals, who make up about half of those seeking abortions, are faced with financial barriers to accessing safe abortions. The cost of transportation, lodging, childcare, and time off work to travel to states with legal abortion services can be insurmountable for many. This results in an increased likelihood of falling below the federal poverty line and facing long-term economic challenges.

Additionally, abortion bans can limit care for those experiencing miscarriage or stillbirth. The medical interventions used to manage pregnancy losses often overlap with abortion procedures, and restrictions on abortion access can delay or deny necessary treatment, endangering the lives of pregnant people.

The impact of abortion bans extends beyond the immediate consequences, as they also affect the mental health and well-being of marginalised groups. Research has shown that women denied abortions report higher stress, anxiety, lower self-esteem, and lower life satisfaction. The stress and trauma associated with abortion restrictions can have intergenerational effects, impacting the overall health and well-being of communities of colour.

Furthermore, abortion laws that grant "fetal personhood" can deter pregnant people, especially people of colour, from seeking medical care during pregnancy loss. The fear of being accused of "self-managing" an abortion or facing criminalisation for pregnancy loss discourages individuals from seeking timely medical attention, further endangering their health.

The overturning of Roe v. Wade has had a profound and disproportionate impact on marginalised groups, affecting their health, economic stability, and reproductive rights. The complex interplay of social, economic, and racial injustices is further exacerbated by abortion bans, highlighting the urgent need for advocacy and policy changes to protect the rights and well-being of these vulnerable communities.

Abortion bans may deter people from seeking medical care during a pregnancy loss

Abortion bans and restrictions can have a detrimental impact on individuals experiencing pregnancy loss, encompassing both miscarriage and stillbirth. The medical interventions employed to manage pregnancy losses often overlap with the procedures and medications used in abortions. This overlap has significant implications for individuals seeking care during a pregnancy loss, as they may encounter barriers to accessing the necessary treatments.

Impact on Clinical Care and Judgement

Abortion bans and restrictions pose challenges for clinicians in providing care for pregnancy losses. The restrictions limit the range of treatment options available, which can be detrimental to the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of individuals experiencing a miscarriage or stillbirth. Clinicians in states with abortion bans express concerns about their ability to practice within the standard of care and effectively manage miscarriages and pregnancy-related emergencies. The fear of criminal liability or loss of their medical license further complicates their decision-making process.

Constraints on Treatment Options

Pregnancy loss can be managed through expectant management, medications, or medical procedures. The medications used to manage early miscarriages, such as misoprostol and mifepristone, are the same ones employed for medication abortions. Similarly, some pregnancy losses are managed using medical procedures like dilation and evacuation (D&E) and dilation and curettage (D&C), which are also utilized for abortions. State abortion bans may deter clinicians from offering these treatments due to concerns about civil or criminal penalties, even in cases where continuing the pregnancy could endanger the pregnant person's health.

Impact on Patient-Provider Relationship

Abortion bans and restrictions can negatively affect the patient-provider relationship. Clinicians in states with bans may be hesitant to offer all available options or referrals for abortion care, hindering their ability to provide comprehensive counselling to patients experiencing pregnancy loss. This dynamic can foster mistrust between patients and clinicians, further exacerbating the challenges faced by individuals seeking care during a pregnancy loss.

Deterring People From Seeking Care

Laws that grant "fetal personhood" can deter pregnant individuals, particularly people of color, from seeking medical care during a pregnancy loss. The fear of being accused of "self-managing" an abortion or facing criminalization for pregnancy loss may prevent them from accessing the necessary care. This deterrence is especially concerning for individuals who already suffer from poorer maternal outcomes, harbor greater distrust of the medical community, and have higher rates of pregnancy loss and criminalization for self-managed abortion.

Addressing Health Inequities

Abortion restrictions and bans have been linked to exacerbating health inequities, particularly for people of color experiencing pregnancy loss. The ongoing biases and discrimination in the healthcare and legal systems can create a medical and legal environment that makes individuals hesitant to seek care. It is crucial to address these disparities and ensure equitable access to care for all individuals facing pregnancy loss.

Abortion bans may negatively impact the patient-clinician relationship

Secondly, abortion bans can create confusion and uncertainty among clinicians about what constitutes a "medical emergency" that warrants an exception to the ban. The varied language used in state laws makes interpretation difficult, and clinicians may be unsure about when they can legally intervene to protect the patient's life or health. This can lead to a decline in the standard of care and negatively impact the patient-clinician relationship.

Thirdly, abortion bans may deter pregnant people, particularly those from marginalized communities, from seeking medical care during pregnancy loss. Laws that grant "fetal personhood" can create a fear of being accused of "self-managing" an abortion, especially since accusations often come from healthcare professionals. This can alter the patient-clinician relationship and promote mistrust.

Additionally, abortion bans may hinder clinician counseling, an essential component of pregnancy loss care. Clinicians in states with abortion bans may fear offering all available options or referrals to care, which can negatively impact their ability to provide comprehensive and unbiased information to patients.

Finally, abortion bans have broader implications for the healthcare workforce. They can make it difficult for hospitals in abortion-restrictive states to attract and retain obstetricians and gynecologists and may impact the future of training for these specialties. This, in turn, can affect the quality of care and the patient-clinician relationship.

Abortion bans may limit the preparedness of future healthcare professionals to treat stillbirths

In the United States, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requires all OBGYN residency programs to provide training in miscarriage management and "opt-out" access to abortion training for their residents. Even before the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, only 60% of OBGYN residents reported having routine access to abortion training. With abortion bans in place, clinical trainees in states that prohibit abortion may now have to travel out of state to obtain training on managing pregnancy loss. This creates logistical obstacles related to travel, coordination, financial costs, and housing, which may impede the ability of some trainees to obtain the necessary training and caseload to become proficient in these skills.

Furthermore, abortion restrictions create a medical and legal environment that exacerbates health inequities, particularly for people of color who are experiencing a pregnancy loss. There is a growing concern that some individuals who are experiencing a pregnancy loss may be hesitant to seek care due to the ongoing biases and discrimination in the health care and legal systems. Symptoms of pregnancy loss are indistinguishable from "self-managed" abortions, and laws that grant "fetal personhood" may deter people from seeking medical care, as a miscarriage may be conflated with a self-managed abortion, risking criminalization.

The impact of abortion bans and restrictions extends beyond abortions themselves and has implications for the management of pregnancy loss, including miscarriage and stillbirth. By limiting the training opportunities for future healthcare professionals, abortion bans may hinder their ability to effectively treat and manage these sensitive and complex cases, potentially impacting patient care and outcomes.

Frequently asked questions