Abortion Laws And Rates: A Global Comparison

Abortion laws vary widely across the world, with some countries prohibiting it entirely and others allowing it on request or based on broad social or economic grounds. In recent years, there has been a global trend towards the liberalization of abortion laws, with more than 60 countries and territories liberalizing their abortion laws over the past 30 years. This shift is particularly notable in Latin America, with countries such as Colombia, Mexico, Argentina, and others in the region embracing a new era of liberalization.

The United States stands as a notable exception to this trend, with the Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v. Wade in 2022 eliminating the constitutional right to abortion and allowing individual states to determine the legality of the procedure. This decision has had a significant impact on abortion access across the country, with many states introducing stricter abortion laws or outright bans.

While the legal status of abortion differs across nations, a majority of countries permit abortion under certain circumstances. The World Health Organization estimates that around 73 million abortions take place worldwide each year, translating to about 39 abortions per 1,000 women globally. This rate has remained relatively stable since 1990, but there are notable differences between countries with fewer restrictions and those with more stringent laws.

The safety of abortion procedures also varies widely, with almost 90% of abortions in countries with liberal abortion laws considered safe, compared to just 25% in countries where abortion is banned. As a result, complications from unsafe abortions contribute to a significant proportion of maternal deaths, particularly in developing countries.

The impact of religion on abortion laws

Religion has a significant influence on abortion laws, with various faiths holding differing views on the morality and legality of the procedure. The impact of religion on abortion laws can be seen across different faiths and countries, shaping the legal landscape and public opinion on abortion. Here is an examination of the impact of religion on abortion laws:

Christian Views on Abortion

Christian denominations vary in their stances on abortion, with some taking a more permissive approach while others staunchly oppose it. The Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church, Oriental Orthodoxy, and many Evangelical Protestants equate abortion to murder and consider it immoral. They actively participate in anti-abortion advocacy and strongly influence legislators. In contrast, mainline Protestant denominations like the Methodist Church, Episcopal Church, and the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America are more lenient, allowing abortion in certain circumstances.

Buddhist Views on Abortion

Buddhism does not have a unified stance on abortion, and its view is shaped by the belief that "life is a continuum with no discernible starting point." While some traditional sources and monastic codes consider life to begin at conception, modern Buddhist teachers and abortion laws in Buddhist countries may permit abortion to protect the mother's life or physical health. However, it may still be seen as an act with negative karmic consequences.

Islamic Views on Abortion

Islamic schools of thought differ on the permissibility of abortion, with the timing of fetal ensoulment being a key factor. The Maliki madhhab, believing ensoulment occurs at conception, prohibits abortion. Hanafi scholars permit abortion before 120 days, while Shafi‘i, Hanbali, and some Hanafi scholars allow it to save the mother's life. Muslim scholars also assert the embryo's right to respect from conception.

Hindu Views on Abortion

Hinduism generally condemns abortion, but there are exceptions. The Sushruta Samhita recommends abortion if the fetus is defective, and some Hindus support abortion when the mother's life is at risk or in cases of severe fetal anomalies. Some Hindu theologians believe personhood begins at three months, implying a possible allowance for abortion until this stage.

Jewish Views on Abortion

Orthodox Jewish teaching typically opposes abortion unless it is necessary to safeguard the pregnant woman's life. Reform, Reconstructionist, and Conservative movements advocate for abortion rights, while the Orthodox movement is less unified. The Hebrew Bible and the Talmud provide conflicting rulings, with the former considering causing a miscarriage a non-capital offense, and the latter stating that a fetus is not legally a person until delivery.

Baháʼí Faith on Abortion

The Baháʼí Faith strongly deprecates abortion for eliminating an unwanted child but allows for medical reasons, including rape, incest, fetal viability, and the mother's health. While Shoghi Effendi, the Guardian of the Baháʼí Faith, considered abortion as ending a life, there are no specific teachings in their sacred texts, leaving the decision to the individual's conscience and medical advice.

Unitarian Universalism on Abortion

The Unitarian Universalist Church strongly advocates for abortion rights, considering it an important aspect of privacy, respect for human life, and freedom of conscience for women and their families.

Religious Influence on Abortion Laws

The religious influence over a country's population significantly determines the legality of abortion. Countries with a higher presence of certain religious denominations tend to have more resources and votes in favor of restrictive abortion laws. However, it is important to note that within these countries, there can be varying degrees of support for legal abortion, influenced by factors such as the importance of religion in one's life and economic development.

Abortion rates in countries with liberal laws vs. restrictive laws

Abortion laws vary widely among countries and territories, and have changed over time. While some countries have liberal abortion laws, others have restrictive ones. The abortion rate in countries with liberal laws has been declining, while it has increased in countries with restrictive laws.

Abortion Laws

Abortion laws range from being freely available on request to having various regulations and restrictions to being prohibited altogether. Many countries that allow abortion have gestational limits, with the majority being up to 12 weeks for abortion on request, up to 24 weeks for rape, incest, or socioeconomic reasons, and more for fetal impairment or risk to the woman's health or life. As of 2024, countries that legally allow abortion on request or for socioeconomic reasons comprise about 60% of the world's population.

Between 1990-94 and 2015-19, the average abortion rate in countries with generally legal abortion (excluding China and India) declined by 43%. In contrast, the average abortion rate in countries with severe restrictions on abortion increased by around 12% during the same period. This divergence in abortion rates between countries with liberal and restrictive laws is likely due to the improved quality and safety of abortion care in countries with liberal laws. Almost 90% of abortions in countries with liberal abortion laws are considered safe, compared to just 25% in countries where abortion is banned.

Access to Safe Abortion

Access to safe abortion has been established as a human right by numerous international frameworks, such as the U.N. Human Rights Committee, and regional human rights courts. Additionally, the World Health Organization (WHO) has recognized unsafe abortion as a public health problem, and countries with broader access to safe abortion have lower maternal mortality rates.

Global Trend Towards Liberalization

Over the past 30 years, more than 60 countries and territories have liberalized their abortion laws, with only four countries rolling back the legality of abortion. This trend is particularly prominent in Latin America, with countries like Colombia, Mexico, Argentina, and others in the region expanding abortion rights.

The safety of abortion procedures in countries with liberal laws vs. restrictive laws

Over the past 30 years, more than 60 countries and territories have liberalized their abortion laws. This trend towards liberalization is global, with countries from Ireland to Nepal recognizing abortion rights as fundamental human rights. In Latin America, the Green Wave has brought about a new era of liberalization in Colombia, Mexico, Argentina, and other countries in the region.

The liberalization of abortion laws has led to improved quality and safety of abortion care, as well as increased maternal survival. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), almost 90% of abortions in countries with liberal abortion laws are considered safe, compared to just 25% of abortions in countries where abortion is banned. This disparity in safety has life-threatening consequences, with approximately 5-13% of maternal deaths worldwide resulting from unsafe abortions, which predominantly occur in developing countries.

In countries with liberal abortion laws, individuals can generally access abortion services without restriction or with minimal restrictions. These countries tend to have gestational limits, allowing abortions up to a specific point during the pregnancy. The most common gestational limit is 12 weeks, although some countries extend this limit or calculate it from the date of conception rather than the first day of the last menstrual period.

On the other hand, countries with restrictive abortion laws often only permit abortions in specific circumstances, such as when the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest, when there is a severe and fatal injury to the fetus, or when the pregnancy poses a threat to the life or health of the pregnant person. In some countries, such as Equatorial Guinea and Zambia, seeking an abortion can result in life imprisonment. The criminalization of abortion creates a "chilling effect," deterring healthcare providers from offering the best care options and preventing pregnant individuals from seeking post-abortion care for complications.

The impact of restrictive abortion laws falls disproportionately on marginalized communities, as they often face barriers in accessing safe abortion services, including financial constraints, travel difficulties, and social stigma. As a result, they may be forced to resort to unsafe abortions, which can lead to fatal consequences and contribute to the high rate of maternal deaths worldwide.

The decriminalisation of abortion

• No one is punished for providing safe abortions
• No one is punished for having an abortion
• The police are not involved in investigating or prosecuting safe abortion provision or practice
• The courts are not involved in deciding whether to allow an abortion
• Abortion is treated like any other form of healthcare

Improved Access to Safe Abortions: Decriminalisation can improve access to safe abortions, especially in countries with restrictive abortion laws. In countries where abortion is illegal, women often resort to unsafe methods, putting their health and lives at risk. According to the World Health Organization, approximately 5-13% of maternal deaths worldwide are due to complications from unsafe abortions, mostly in developing countries.

Women's Rights and Autonomy: Decriminalisation upholds women's rights to make decisions about their own bodies and reproductive health. It recognises that a woman's ability to control her fertility is fundamental to her autonomy and equality.

Public Health Benefits: Restrictive abortion laws do not necessarily reduce the number of abortions; instead, they drive women towards unsafe and illegal procedures. By decriminalising abortion and providing access to safe and legal procedures, countries can improve women's health outcomes and reduce maternal mortality rates.

Reduced Stigma: Criminal sanctions around abortion contribute to the stigma associated with the procedure. Decriminalisation can help reduce this stigma, encouraging women to seek safe abortions without fear of legal repercussions or social judgment.

Improved Quality of Care: When abortion is decriminalised, healthcare providers can offer the procedure without fear of prosecution. This can lead to improved quality of care, as providers are more likely to be properly trained and equipped to perform abortions safely.

Legal and Political Challenges: Changing abortion laws can be a lengthy and challenging process, often involving significant opposition from religious, moral, and political groups. Additionally, even in countries with liberal abortion laws, access to safe abortions may still be limited due to other factors such as a lack of state-run services, geographic barriers, or cultural stigma.

The trend towards the liberalisation of abortion laws is undeniable, with an increasing number of countries recognising abortion rights as fundamental human rights. However, it is important to acknowledge that this process is complex and varies across different cultural, religious, and legal contexts.

The impact of abortion laws on maternal survival

The liberalization of abortion laws has been a global trend over the past few decades, with more than 60 countries and territories relaxing their restrictions. This shift towards less restrictive abortion laws has had a significant impact on maternal survival rates. In countries with liberal abortion laws, almost 90% of abortions are considered safe, compared to just 25% in countries where abortion is banned. This disparity in safety has life-or-death consequences, as unsafe abortions are a leading cause of maternal mortality worldwide, particularly in developing countries.

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that approximately 5-13% of maternal deaths can be attributed to complications from unsafe abortions. By improving access to safe and legal abortion services, countries can significantly reduce maternal mortality rates and ensure that women's lives are protected. However, it is important to recognize that the decision to terminate a pregnancy is never made lightly, and women's reproductive rights and autonomy must be respected.

While the liberalization of abortion laws has generally led to improved maternal survival, there are still challenges and complexities. In some countries, such as Zambia, structural and cultural barriers exist even with liberal laws on paper. For example, in Zambia, the law stipulates that only a registered medical doctor can perform an abortion, which limits access for women in rural areas where such doctors are scarce. Additionally, the legalization of abortion does not automatically translate to improved access or quality of care.

To ensure that women can access safe and legal abortions, it is crucial to address these barriers. This includes increasing the number of trained healthcare providers, particularly in rural and underserved areas, and removing unnecessary restrictions, such as mandatory waiting periods or parental consent requirements. Additionally, destigmatizing abortion and providing accurate information can empower women to make informed decisions about their reproductive health.

Frequently asked questions