Miracles: Nature's Laws Or Divine Intervention?

The concept of miracles has been a topic of debate between believers and non-believers, with some arguing that miracles are violations of the laws of nature. However, this presupposes the non-existence of a supernatural being, as without one, miracles cannot occur by definition. On the other hand, those who accept the possibility of a higher power believe that miracles are possible and do not break the laws of nature. C.S. Lewis, for instance, defines a miracle as an interference with nature by a supernatural power. This essay will explore the relationship between miracles and the laws of nature, examining whether miracles truly break these laws or if they are a result of divine intervention.

Miracles are a violation of the laws of nature

It is often said that miracles are a violation of the laws of nature. This statement, however, assumes a particular understanding of what constitutes a "law of nature." To violate a law of nature would be to act against the very fabric of the universe as we know it, and many would argue that this is impossible.

Understanding the Laws of Nature

The laws of nature are often understood as rigid and prescriptive, dictating the outcome of events with absolute certainty. However, this interpretation fails to account for the role of external factors. Philosopher of religion William Lane Craig argues that the laws of nature are more accurately described as "universal inductive generalizations." In other words, they describe what would happen in a particular case, assuming no intervening supernatural factors.

The Role of God in Miracles

According to this perspective, miracles do not break the laws of nature but rather introduce new causal factors—specifically, the supernatural intervention of God. In the Christian tradition, miracles are often understood as signs of God's power and love, sent to authenticate a messenger or usher in a new period of revelation.

The Possibility of Miracles

The possibility of miracles hinges on one's presuppositions. If one presupposes that there is no supernatural being, then miracles become impossible by definition. On the other hand, if one accepts the possibility of an almighty God, miracles can be understood as a suspension of the natural course of events, rather than a breach of the laws of nature themselves.

In conclusion, while miracles may seem to violate our understanding of the natural order, they do not inherently break the laws of nature. Instead, they highlight the potential for divine intervention, restoring the world to its original, perfect state.

God does not break the laws of nature, but suspends them

The concept of miracles and whether they break the laws of nature is a highly debated topic, especially among Christians. A miracle can be defined as an interference with nature by a supernatural power.

Many Christians believe that God does not break the laws of nature but merely suspends them. This view is supported by C.S. Lewis, who argues that miracles are not a breach of the laws of nature but rather a restoration of the natural order. He suggests that God created the world to be perfect, but due to human disobedience, it has fallen into a state of disrepair. Miracles, therefore, are moments when God intervenes to restore the original order of His creation.

This perspective is also held by Barbara Drossel, a Professor of Physics at Technical University of Darmstadt. She argues that the laws of nature are not all-encompassing and that God, as the Creator, can intervene and suspend these laws without breaking them.

Another argument for this view is that miracles require a knowledge of the laws of nature to be recognised as miraculous. If the laws of nature did not exist or were broken, there would be no basis for identifying a miracle.

Furthermore, some Christians argue that the laws of physics do not bind God, as their Maker, and that God has the power to create and change matter according to His will.

However, it is important to note that not all Christians agree with this perspective, and there are other interpretations of how miracles relate to the laws of nature.

Miracles are possible if you accept the possibility of an almighty God

Miracles are often understood as violations of the laws of nature. However, this understanding assumes that the laws of nature are rigid and prescriptive, rather than descriptive. Philosopher of religion William Lane Craig argues that the laws of nature are universal inductive generalizations that describe what would happen in a particular case, assuming no intervening supernatural factors.

If we accept this understanding of the laws of nature, then miracles do not break these laws but instead introduce new, outside factors that suspend the natural course of events. This perspective is supported by C.S. Lewis, who defines a miracle as "an interference with nature by a supernatural power."

The possibility of miracles hinges on one's acceptance of the existence of a supernatural power or an almighty God. As the Westminster Confession of Faith states, "God, in his ordinary providence, makes use of means, yet is free to work without, above, and against them, at his pleasure." If one presupposes that there is no supernatural being, then miracles cannot exist by definition. On the other hand, if one accepts the possibility of an almighty God, miracles become a logical possibility.

The evidence for miracles, particularly those performed by Jesus Christ, is found in the historical testimony of the Gospels and the early Church. These miracles served to authenticate the messenger and usher in a new period of God's revelation. For instance, Jesus' miracles demonstrated his identity, kingdom, and character, showcasing his power as the Lord of creation and his love for humanity.

In conclusion, miracles do not break the laws of nature but instead represent moments when God intervenes, suspending the natural course of events. This understanding of miracles is dependent on the acceptance of the possibility of an almighty God, a presupposition that shapes how one interprets the evidence for miracles.

Miracles are not commonplace in the Bible

The miracles of Jesus demonstrated His identity, His kingdom, and His character. Peter told the Jews at Pentecost:

> Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God to you by miracles, wonders, and signs, which God did among you through him, as you yourselves know. (Acts 2:22)

When John the Baptist asked if Jesus was the one who was to come, Jesus replied:

> Go back and report to John what you hear and see: the blind receive sight, the lame walk, those who have leprosy are cured, the deaf hear, the dead are raised, and the good news is preached to the poor. (Matthew 11:5)

Jesus' miracles also demonstrated His love, as they were done for the good of people. For example, at the feeding of the 5,000, Jesus said:

> I have compassion for these people...I do not want to send them away hungry, or they may collapse on the way. (Mark 8:2-3)

Most of the things Jesus did were not miracles. He did many ordinary and extraordinary things, such as sawing wood, walking through villages, and weeping at funerals. The miracles were a sign of who He was and a message about God.

In the Old Testament, miracles occurred mostly in connection with one prominent leader at a time, such as Moses, Elijah, or Elisha. In the New Testament, there was a sudden and unprecedented increase in miracles when Jesus began His ministry. However, the authority to work miracles was not confined to Jesus Himself. He gave authority to heal the sick and cast out demons to the Twelve and seventy of His disciples (Luke 10:1, 9, 17-19; cf. Matthew 10:8).

The miracles of the early church served a relevant purpose in redemptive history: verifying the authenticity of God's revelation and signaling the coming of the new eschatological age among God's people. For example, in Acts 15, the early church leaders debated whether Gentile converts to Christianity had to keep the Old Testament law and be circumcised. The miraculous works of God served as evidence that God was working in a new and unique way among the Gentiles.

While miracles are not commonplace, they still happen today, and Christians should avoid the extremes of seeing everything or nothing as a miracle. God is miraculously calling people to Himself as His church grows and expands.

Miracles are a sign of God's identity, kingdom, and character

The miracles performed by Jesus, for instance, revealed his identity as a divine figure. In Acts 2:22, Peter tells the Jews at Pentecost: "Jesus of Nazareth was a man accredited by God to you by miracles, wonders and signs, which God did among you through him, as you yourselves know". Jesus' miracles also demonstrated his kingdom, as the signs of the Kingdom were done through him. When asked if he was the one who was to come, Jesus replied by listing the miracles he had performed, such as healing the blind and raising the dead (Matthew 11:5).

Furthermore, miracles reveal God's character, as they are done for the good of people and demonstrate his love. For example, when Jesus fed the 5,000, he did so out of compassion for the people, so that they would not go hungry (Matthew 14:14). Miracles also reveal God's glory, confirm his message, and convey his truths to those who witness them.

In summary, miracles are a sign of God's identity, kingdom, and character. They reveal God's power, love, and glory, and they serve to authenticate the messenger and usher in a new period of God's revelation.

Frequently asked questions