Miranda Rights: Do They Apply To Minors?

In the United States, Miranda laws are based on the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. They require law enforcement to advise arrested suspects of their rights before interrogation. This includes the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and that anything said can be used against them in court. These rights apply equally to minors as they do to adults. However, the issue of whether a minor is in custody when questioned by police, especially at school, is more complex and depends on various factors, including the child's age and the specific circumstances of the interrogation.

Minors have the right to remain silent

The Miranda warning, often heard on television and in movies, includes the following:

> You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you.

Minors have the right to waive their Miranda rights, but only if they do so voluntarily and, in the case of a child under 18, after consulting with a lawyer. If a minor waives their rights, they can still invoke their right to remain silent at any time. This means that they can choose to stop answering questions and remain silent. It is important to note that no special words are required to invoke this right, but the minor must clearly and affirmatively state their intention.

Courts will carefully review the circumstances if a minor waives their Miranda rights. They will consider factors such as the minor's age, intelligence, and emotional state at the time, as well as any coercive tactics used by law enforcement. The presence or absence of a parent or guardian during the interrogation will also be taken into account.

In the context of schools, Miranda warnings are generally required when police officers question students. This is because students usually do not feel free to leave, and the authority of the school administrators can create a coercive atmosphere. However, if the questioning relates to school discipline or safety, and not to a criminal matter, Miranda warnings are typically not required.

Minors have the right to an attorney

Minors have the same rights as adults when it comes to Miranda rights. This includes the right to an attorney. If a minor cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for them.

In California, for example, minors accused of juvenile crimes have the right to remain silent and to be read their Miranda warning before being interrogated. This is the same warning often heard on television and in movies:

> You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you.

A minor may waive their Miranda rights, but only if the waiver is voluntary, and in the case of a child aged 17 or under, if they first consulted with a lawyer. If either of these conditions is not met, any confession made by the child will be inadmissible to prove their guilt during a California juvenile adjudication hearing or a criminal trial.

The right to an attorney is an important protection for minors, who may be less familiar with the criminal justice system and their rights, and more likely to be intimidated by police officers. A judge will want to ensure that a minor understood their Miranda rights and the surrounding circumstances.

Minors can waive Miranda rights under certain conditions

Minors are generally thought to have a higher degree of protection than adults when it comes to their Miranda rights. This is because their age often precludes them from being able to consent to other things, like a breath or blood test without a parent present. However, the Miranda rights themselves are equally applicable to minors as they are to adults.

Miranda rights relate specifically to a person's right not to self-incriminate, as established in the 1966 case Miranda v. Arizona. If a minor is in custody and is interrogated by a law enforcement officer without their Miranda rights being read to them, any confession they give is inadmissible in court. However, if they are not in custody, police may question them without informing them of their Miranda rights, and their statements may be used in court.

Determining whether a minor is in custody and therefore entitled to a Miranda warning can be complex. In the case of Thompson v. Keohane, the U.S. Supreme Court outlined two essential inquiries: the circumstances surrounding the interrogation, and whether, given those circumstances, a reasonable person would have felt they were free to terminate the interrogation and leave. In J.D.B. v. North Carolina, the Court reiterated that the child's age must be taken into account when making this determination.

When Miranda warnings are required, police officers must state the rights to a minor in a language they understand. If a parent or guardian can be located, the officer must also explain to them that the minor is in custody, the alleged delinquent act, and the minor's Miranda rights.

Minors can waive their Miranda rights, as long as they understand those rights and the consequences of waiving them. However, for the waiver to be considered "voluntary, knowing, and intelligent," courts will consider various factors, including:

• The minor's age, education level, and intelligence
• The minor's emotional characteristics and state of mind at the time of questioning
• Whether the minor had any prior experience with the criminal justice system
• The length and tone of the questioning
• Any physical coercion, punishment, deceit, or offers of leniency
• Whether a parent or guardian was present

Ultimately, the question of whether a minor voluntarily waived their Miranda rights will depend on the specific facts of each case.

Minors can be interrogated at school without Miranda warnings

Minors are typically thought to have a higher degree of protection than adults, as their age precludes them from being able to consent. This means that, in many instances, it is even more important that Miranda rights are read to a minor than to an adult. However, Miranda rights are not constitutionally derived, but rather based on a 1970s case, Miranda v. Arizona, in which the Supreme Court established the Miranda rights.

Miranda rights are intended to protect people who are suspected of committing a crime. Law enforcement must issue these warnings to an adult or a minor before interrogating them while in custody. This means that the suspect must feel that they are not free to leave, and the actions of law enforcement must be reasonably likely to encourage the suspect to incriminate themselves.

When it comes to minors, the concern for coercion and violations of Miranda protections is greater. Minors are less likely to be familiar with the criminal justice system and their rights, and they are more likely to be intimidated by police officers. A judge will consider not only physical but also psychological forms of coercion by the police.

In the context of schools, when the police question students, the situation is more likely to be considered custodial because students generally do not feel that they can leave. This makes it especially important to provide them with Miranda warnings. However, if school administrators are handling the questioning, they do not need to provide Miranda warnings unless they are working for or with law enforcement. This is because school administrators are not usually law enforcement agents, and therefore they are generally free to question students about wrongdoing without giving Miranda warnings.

In conclusion, minors can be interrogated at school without Miranda warnings, but only by school administrators who are not working for or with law enforcement. If law enforcement is involved in the interrogation, either directly or indirectly, then Miranda warnings are typically required.

Minors are entitled to counsel during delinquency proceedings

The right to counsel is a crucial aspect of the Miranda rights, which are based on the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Miranda rights apply equally to minors and adults, and they must be read to a minor before they are interrogated while in custody. This means that law enforcement officers must advise minors of their rights, including the right to an attorney, before questioning them if the minor is in custody.

In the context of schools, the situation becomes more complex. When the police question students in school, it is generally considered a custodial situation because students do not feel free to leave. Therefore, Miranda warnings, including the right to counsel, are especially important in these circumstances. However, if school administrators are handling the questioning, they are not required to provide Miranda warnings unless they are working with or for law enforcement.

It is worth noting that minors can waive their Miranda rights, including the right to counsel, but this waiver must be voluntary, knowing, and intelligent. Courts will review waivers by minors more carefully than those by adults and consider factors such as age, intelligence, and the presence or absence of parents or guardians. Ultimately, the prosecution has the burden of proving that the minor understood their rights and voluntarily waived them.

Frequently asked questions