Young Women's Stance On Alabama's Abortion Law

Alabama's abortion ban has sparked a debate about whether men should have a say in the discussion, given that they will never experience pregnancy. While men make up the majority of the state legislators who voted for the abortion ban, women are more divided on the issue. Some women believe that abortion should be illegal in all or most cases, while others support a woman's right to choose. Ultimately, the question of whether young women support Alabama's abortion ban is complex and multifaceted, with a variety of factors and perspectives to consider.

The Alabama Human Life Protection Act

The act does not include a procedure to terminate the pregnancy of a woman with an ectopic pregnancy or a pregnancy where the unborn child has a lethal anomaly. Removing deceased fetuses is allowed regardless of gestational age. The act also does not make exceptions for cases of incest, rape, or human trafficking.

The act was challenged in court by Planned Parenthood and the ACLU of Alabama on May 24, 2019, with the three remaining abortion clinics in Alabama serving as plaintiffs. A federal judge blocked the bill on October 28, 2019, stating that it defied previous rulings in Roe v. Wade and the U.S. Constitution. However, after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on June 24, 2022, the injunction was lifted, and the Alabama Human Life Protection Act went into effect.

The act imposes criminal penalties on physicians and other healthcare workers who perform illegal abortions. A physician who performs an abortion is guilty of a Class A felony and faces a prison sentence of 10 to 99 years and a fine of up to $60,000. Attempting an illegal abortion is a Class C felony, punishable by one to ten years in prison. It is important to note that the state will not file criminal charges against a pregnant woman who obtains an abortion.

The role of men in the abortion debate

The abortion debate in Alabama, and across the US, has largely focused on women, with men's voices often absent from the conversation. However, men are also affected by abortions and should be included in discussions and decisions surrounding this issue.

Men whose partners have abortions can experience a range of emotions, including grief, shame, and regret. They may also feel a sense of loss and wish to grieve for the terminated pregnancy. A survey by Support After Abortion found that while over half of men who had experienced an abortion said they had a voice in the decision, 71% also reported adverse changes in themselves afterward, with 83% seeking help or feeling they could have benefited from talking to someone.

Men should be encouraged to take responsibility for their children and be held accountable if they are disengaged. Following the Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson decision, which overturned Roe v. Wade, there has been bipartisan agreement that men must take more responsibility for their children. For instance, Republican lawmakers introduced a bill that would require financial obligations for men from the moment of conception.

Additionally, men should be given a voice in the abortion conversation, allowing them to advocate for their child and grieve their loss. This could help to improve how society views men's roles in families and encourage men to fulfill their roles as fathers and partners.

It is important to recognize that men can be affected by abortions in different ways and that their experiences may vary. While some men may feel a sense of loss and grief, others may support their partner's decision and deal with the aftermath emotionally.

The abortion debate in Alabama and across the US has primarily focused on women's rights and bodily autonomy, which is crucial. However, it is also essential to consider the role of men and the impact that abortion can have on them. By including men in the conversation, society can better support them and ensure that all parties involved in an abortion have the resources and support they need.

The impact of abortion laws on IVF access

In 2024, the Alabama Supreme Court ruled that frozen embryos used for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) should be considered children. This ruling has had a significant impact on IVF access in the state. Several IVF providers in Alabama have suspended their services in response to the ruling, as couples are now allowed to file wrongful death lawsuits if their embryos are destroyed.

The court's decision has raised several questions and concerns about the status of frozen embryos. For example, it is unclear whether embryos can be destroyed and what the implications are for pre-implantation genetic testing. The ruling has also sparked debates about the ethical and legal status of embryos, with some arguing that life begins at fertilisation and that embryos are, therefore, deserving of the same respect and protection as any child.

In response to the court's ruling, the Alabama state legislature passed a temporary law to provide legal protections for those undergoing IVF treatments. However, the impact of the ruling on IVF access in Alabama remains uncertain. The state has a history of restrictive abortion laws, and it is possible that the ruling could further limit access to reproductive health services, including IVF.

Overall, the impact of abortion laws on IVF access in Alabama remains to be seen. The state's recent ruling on the status of frozen embryos has already led to a suspension of services by some IVF providers, and it is possible that further restrictions on IVF access could be implemented in the future.

The criminalisation of pregnancy

The rise in pregnancy criminalisation is fuelled by the concept of "fetal personhood" in anti-abortion rhetoric and laws. As of 2018, 38 states had laws in which the "victim" of a crime can include a fetus, generally called "fetal assault", "fetal homicide", or "fetal protection" laws. These laws have been used to prosecute people who experience pregnancy loss, pregnancy-related complications, or abortion.

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) opposes any policies or practices that seek to criminalise individuals for conduct alleged to be harmful to their pregnancy or based on pregnancy outcomes. ACOG believes that criminalisation interferes with access to medical care and is counter-productive to improving maternal and infant health.

The history of the anti-abortion movement

The anti-abortion movement in the US has a long history, dating back to before the 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide.

The Early Years

Before 1840, abortion was a common and largely stigma-free practice in the US. During this period, the "quickening doctrine" from British common law was used to determine the legality of abortion. Quickening occurred when the pregnant woman could feel the fetus move, typically between the fourth and sixth month of pregnancy. This was the only way to confirm pregnancy, and so abortions before this point were not prosecuted. However, post-quickening abortions were considered a crime, albeit a minor one.

In the mid-19th century, the first "right-to-life" movement emerged, led by physicians seeking to increase their professional status and weed out competition from other healers. By 1900, every state had passed laws forbidding abortion at any stage, and almost all included a "therapeutic exception" where licensed physicians could provide abortions if the mother's life was at risk.

The Modern Movement Emerges

In the 1950s and 1960s, a movement to liberalize abortion laws gained momentum, influenced by the second-wave feminist movement and high-profile therapeutic abortion cases. In 1965, a Supreme Court decision in Griswold v. Connecticut set a precedent for an expansive right to privacy in reproductive healthcare. However, in response, several anti-abortion organizations were formed, mostly led by Catholic institutions. The first major organization in the modern anti-abortion movement was the National Right to Life Committee, formed in 1967.

Post-Roe v. Wade

The 1973 Roe v. Wade decision changed everything for the anti-abortion movement. Activists and state legislators now focused on the national level, promoting the Hyde Amendment (which prohibited federal funding of abortions through Medicaid) and pushing for a constitutional amendment banning abortion. The movement became heavily associated with Catholic and Evangelical Christian groups and the Republican Party.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, evangelical Christians joined the movement in large numbers, with many forming new, more radical groups. These groups employed tactics such as blockading abortion clinics and harassing patients and providers. At the same time, more moderate groups worked to make abortion access more difficult through parental notification laws, "informed consent" requirements, and waiting periods.

Recent Developments

In recent years, the anti-abortion movement has been successful in promoting new laws restricting abortion at the state level. In 2019, several states enacted "fetal heartbeat abortion bills," which restrict abortion to the period before a fetal heartbeat can be detected. In 2022, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, ending federal abortion rights and allowing individual states to regulate abortion laws.

The anti-abortion movement continues to be politically active, with a variety of organizations advocating for legal prohibition or restriction of abortion on ethical, moral, or religious grounds.

Frequently asked questions