Lawbreaking And Un-American Actions: What's The Real Connection?

The United States has one of the highest incarceration rates in the world, but some claim that the percentage of Americans who have committed crimes is actually around 100%. While this is difficult to prove statistically, it is true that many people break the law and get away with it. A poll by onepoll.com found that the average person commits around seven crimes per week, including speeding, texting while driving, and illegal downloading. Other common infractions include connecting to unsecured Wi-Fi, singing copyrighted songs in public, and playing poker for money at home. These actions may seem minor, but they are still technically illegal and can carry unexpected penalties. So, does breaking the law make you un-American? The answer is nuanced, as it depends on one's definition of American and the specific laws being broken.

Does jaywalking make you un-American?

The term "jaywalking" originated in the United States, referring to the act of pedestrians walking in or crossing a roadway in contravention of traffic regulations. While the specific laws and penalties vary by jurisdiction, jaywalking is generally considered illegal in the US. However, it is important to note that jaywalking laws are not always enforced, and the severity of penalties differs across states and cities.

In some areas, jaywalking may be deemed a minor infraction, while in others, it could be considered a misdemeanor. The penalties for jaywalking typically include fines, with amounts varying from as little as $1 to as much as $1000 in different US cities. In certain cases, jaywalking may result in additional citations if the behaviour was particularly dangerous.

The act of jaywalking can be dangerous for both pedestrians and drivers, as it can interfere with the flow of traffic and increase the risk of accidents. Despite the risks and legal implications, jaywalking is a common occurrence in many US cities, including New York City, Chicago, and Boston. While police may not always issue citations, they generally intervene when jaywalking behaviour is excessive or presents an obvious danger.

In conclusion, while jaywalking is illegal and can result in penalties, it is not uncommon for people to engage in this behaviour due to convenience, expectations of free movement, or personal safety. The perception of jaywalking as "un-American" is not a widely discussed topic, and the focus is typically on the safety and legal implications rather than any cultural or patriotic implications.

Is speeding un-American?

Speeding is a common occurrence in the US, with many people reporting that they feel pressured to exceed the speed limit. In a poll of 5,000 people, 46% admitted to speeding, making it the most common crime committed. This is in part due to the wide, straight, and open roads that characterise the US, which intuitively invite faster driving. Additionally, the lack of speed cameras and low penalties for speeding mean there is little deterrence for those who do break the speed limit.

However, the normalisation of speeding in the US does not make it any less un-American. Breaking the law, regardless of how minor the offence may seem, is still illegal and can have serious consequences. Speeding, in particular, can lead to accidents and increase the risk of fatalities on the road.

While some may argue that speeding is a necessary evil to get around the vast American landscape quickly, it is important to remember that breaking the law, even in seemingly small ways, can have a negative impact on society as a whole. It sets a precedent that it is acceptable to flout the rules, which can lead to a breakdown of social order.

Therefore, while speeding may be common in the US, it cannot be considered an American value or right. It is simply a reflection of a wider cultural issue, where individualism and convenience are often prioritised over community and collective responsibility.

Does using someone else's Wi-Fi make you un-American?

The concept of "American-ness" is complex and multifaceted, and it is challenging to define a single action or behaviour that would automatically exclude someone from being considered American. That said, breaking the law, especially in a way that harms or infringes on the rights of others, could be seen as contrary to the values of a democratic and law-abiding society, which are fundamental to American identity.

When it comes to the specific act of using someone else's Wi-Fi without their permission, it is important to note that this is illegal and considered a form of theft in most states under the 1986 Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. While it may seem like a minor offence, it can have significant consequences, including slowing down the connection speed for the owner and potentially exposing them to security risks if the thief engages in illegal activities, steals passwords or personal information, or installs malware.

Using someone else's Wi-Fi without their consent can be seen as a violation of trust and a breach of social norms that value honesty, respect for private property, and adherence to the law. These values are deeply ingrained in American culture and are often associated with what it means to be a "good citizen". By committing this act, one could be perceived as disregarding these values and, consequently, risking being labelled as "un-American".

On the other hand, it is worth considering that the average person commits around seven crimes per week, according to a poll by onepoll.com. Many of these crimes are minor and often committed unknowingly, such as speeding, texting while driving, or illegally downloading music. This perspective highlights the complexity of defining a single action as "un-American", as it is not always clear-cut or universally agreed upon.

In conclusion, while using someone else's Wi-Fi without permission is illegal and may be considered unethical, it is important to recognise that the definition of "American-ness" is subjective and influenced by a variety of cultural, social, and individual factors. The perception of this act may vary depending on the context, the intentions of the person committing it, and the values held by those judging the behaviour.

Does taking drugs make you un-American?

The United States has a long history of problematic drug policies, including those related to immigration. Title 8 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) Section 1182 deems people who use drugs or have an addiction inadmissible and denies their entry into the country. This policy is based on outdated understandings of addiction as a moral failing rather than a chronic disease. It also stems from racist and stigmatizing ideologies that associate drug use with "undesirable" non-white groups.

The current immigration laws in the United States reflect these discriminatory origins, considering people who use drugs or have addictions as ineligible for visas or admission based on health-related grounds, claiming they "may pose a threat to the property, safety, or welfare of the alien or others." However, these policies contradict the country's founding principles of liberty and opportunity and other protections afforded by the government, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act, which aims to ensure the rights of individuals with addictions are respected.

Drug use, including the use of illegal drugs, is common in the United States, with over 32 million people (11.7% of the population) actively using drugs as of 2021. When considering alcohol and tobacco use, this number rises to over 60% of the population. Drug use affects people of all ages, genders, and income levels, and it is becoming more accepted and normalized in American culture.

The negative consequences of drug use are significant, with an economic cost of over $740 billion each year in lost work, healthcare, and drug-related crimes. Drug overdose deaths are also a major issue, with nearly one million deaths since 2000, and drug abuse often leading to comorbid mental health issues.

In conclusion, while drug use, including illegal drug use, is prevalent in the United States, it does not make one "un-American." The notion that drug use is un-American stems from outdated and discriminatory ideologies. A more compassionate and scientific approach to drug use and addiction is needed, one that aligns with human rights principles and contemporary scientific understanding.

Does playing poker for money at home make you un-American?

The notion of being "un-American" is a complex and subjective concept that is often influenced by cultural, social, and political factors. While playing poker for money at home may be considered illegal in certain states across the US, it does not necessarily equate to being "un-American." The perception of an "un-American" act is shaped by individual interpretations of American values, traditions, and laws.

Playing poker for money at home can be a fun social activity, but it is important to be aware of the legal implications to ensure compliance with state regulations. The legality of home poker games varies across different states in the US. Some states, like Illinois, permit home poker games as long as certain conditions are met. These conditions typically include playing in a private location, having a bona fide social relationship among the players, ensuring no house profit, and adhering to bet limits.

On the other hand, states like Alabama and Florida explicitly prohibit home poker games and consider them illegal. Therefore, it is crucial for individuals to understand the specific gambling laws and regulations within their state before organizing or participating in home poker games. Failure to comply with state regulations can result in legal consequences, including criminal charges, fines, and even loss of property.

Additionally, it is worth noting that the legal context of poker is subject to change. For instance, the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) passed in 2006 primarily targeted online gambling operations, but it did not significantly impact private, in-person poker games. However, the legal landscape began to shift in 2011 when the Department of Justice clarified that the Wire Act might not prohibit states from allowing online poker.

In conclusion, playing poker for money at home does not inherently make one "un-American." However, it is essential to recognize that breaking the law, regardless of its nature, can have negative consequences and may be perceived negatively by others. While the average person may commit minor crimes unknowingly or unintentionally, it is important to stay informed about local laws and regulations to make informed decisions and avoid potential legal issues.

Frequently asked questions