Laws And Morality: Do We All Break Rules?

It is widely believed that everyone breaks the law at some point in their lives. While this may be true for some, it is not necessarily true for all. A poll by onepoll.com found that the average person commits around seven crimes per week, with speeding being the most common offence. Other common offences include talking or texting while driving, dropping litter, illegally downloading music, and not wearing a seatbelt. In addition, some people may not even be aware that they are committing an offence, as they may not know what the laws are or that they have crossed a line. For example, it is a federal offence to open someone else's mail in the US, and college students may commit unintentional felonies by photographing or copying books and other materials.

People may break the law without knowing

It is commonly argued that everyone breaks the law at some point in their lives, and a key reason for this is that they may not even be aware that they have done so. Ignorance of the law is not a defence, and so even if a person does not know the laws or realise they have crossed a line, they are still liable.

There are numerous examples of laws that people may unknowingly break. For instance, in India, it is illegal to access a Wi-Fi network without authorisation, and this is governed by the IPC Act 1860 and the IT Act 2000. Pranks are another example of an activity that is often not taken seriously but can result in legal trouble. In some places, flying a kite without permission is prohibited and can result in imprisonment or a large fine.

Other laws that people may not be aware of include those relating to loud music and noise pollution. For example, in India, under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, everyone has the right to a peaceful life, and playing loud music at night can result in a significant fine. Similarly, in many places, people may not realise that they are breaking the law by violating traffic rules, such as signal jumping, speeding, or not wearing a seatbelt.

In addition, activities such as drinking alcohol below the legal age limit, opening someone else's mail, or selling raw milk that crosses state lines are also illegal in certain places. These examples demonstrate how common it is for people to unknowingly break the law, and highlight the importance of being aware of the laws and defence options in one's jurisdiction.

Minor law-breaking is common

In some cases, people may not even realise they are committing a criminal offence. For instance, it is a federal offence to open someone else's mail, and college students may have committed unintentional felonies by photographing or copying their books and other materials.

The argument has been made that everyone breaks the law, and one reason for this may be a lack of awareness of the laws or the boundaries that should not be crossed. Since ignorance of the law is not a defence, this still means that a criminal offence has been committed, whether or not the person understands it.

Additionally, some people may view breaking the law as acceptable if the crimes are minor. A poll by onepoll.com found that 58% of people viewed minor law-breaking as "OK". This normalisation of minor crimes may contribute to their prevalence in society.

People may not care about breaking the law

It is a common belief that everyone breaks the law at some point in their lives. While this may be true, it is important to note that not everyone cares about breaking the law. There are several reasons why people may not care about breaking the law.

Firstly, many people are unaware that they are committing a criminal offence. In some cases, people may not know the laws or understand the consequences of their actions. For instance, it is considered a federal offence to open someone else's mail, sell raw milk across state lines, or for college students to photograph or copy their books and other materials. These offences are often committed accidentally or without realising they are illegal. As ignorance of the law is not a defence, individuals who commit these acts are still held responsible, even if they are unaware of the law.

Secondly, some people view breaking the law as acceptable if the crimes are minor or considered victimless. A poll by onepoll.com found that 58% of respondents believed that breaking the law was "OK" if the crimes were minor. This percentage is quite significant, indicating that over half of the population may not have a strong regard for the law as long as the offence is deemed minor.

Additionally, social norms and cultural contexts play a role in how people perceive certain laws. For example, a Latino user on Reddit shared that they are used to breaking minor laws such as curfews, traffic signs, and buying alcohol as a minor since it is generally accepted within their community and even by the police. In this case, the individual and their community may not care about breaking these specific laws due to cultural norms and the lack of strict enforcement.

Furthermore, people may not care about breaking the law if they believe that the chances of getting caught are low. This is particularly true for crimes that are difficult to enforce or monitor, such as speeding or talking on the phone while driving. Individuals may rationalise that as long as they are not caught, there are no immediate consequences to their actions.

Lastly, some people may not care about breaking the law due to a lack of personal moral alignment with certain laws. For example, individuals who believe in the normalisation of certain drugs may continue to use them despite their illegal status. Similarly, those who believe that downloading music or media illegally is acceptable may continue to do so, especially if they feel that the laws are outdated or unfair.

People may feel ostracised for breaking the law

Breaking the law can result in a person feeling ostracised from society. This is due to the negative impact it can have on a person's reputation, even if they are ultimately cleared of the charges.

For example, two people may have decided to drive home from a party after drinking. One person gets home without incident, whereas the other gets into a car accident where the other driver passes away. The latter ends up in jail for decades, and despite the former making the exact same decision to drink and drive, they are now leading very different lives.

In addition, people may not even realise they are breaking the law. Ignorance of the law is not a defence, but many people may not know what the laws are or that they have crossed a line. For instance, it is a federal offence to open someone else's mail or sell raw milk across state lines. College students may also have committed unintentional felonies while photographing or copying their books and other materials.

As a result, people may feel ostracised for breaking the law, even if they did not realise they were doing so. Furthermore, the stigma associated with criminal activity can lead to individuals feeling isolated and judged, even if they were not caught or charged.

People may not know their defence options

While ignorance of the law is typically not a valid defence, there are exceptions. In certain circumstances, a person must not only perform an illegal act but must also know that it was illegal to do so. In such cases, ignorance of the law can be a defence.

For example, in the case of State of Minnesota v. Mikulak, the defendant was charged and pled guilty to knowingly violating a portion of the predatory offender registration statute. However, during his plea hearing, it became evident that the defendant did not know that his failure to register was unlawful. He appealed his conviction, arguing that because he did not know he was required to register within 24 hours, he could not have knowingly failed to register within that time frame. The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the defendant's conviction, acknowledging that ignorance of the law is a defence when the crime requires a knowing violation.

Additionally, in some cases, specific intent is required for a crime, and if the individual committing the crime is unaware that the activity is illegal, they may have a valid defence of ignorance. Furthermore, ignorance can be a defence for violating new laws that are not yet widely known.

It is important to note that ignorance of the law is only a defence in limited circumstances. Most crimes do not require knowledge that the conduct is unlawful. In such cases, individuals may have other defence options available to them. For instance, in a breaking and entering charge, several defences may be applicable depending on the facts of the case. These defences include consent, mistake of fact, open structure, mistaken identity, and alibi.

In the context of self-defence, individuals have the right to protect themselves and their property, but the use of force must be reasonable and proportional to the threat posed. The determination of reasonableness is often made by a judge on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific circumstances of each situation.

Overall, while ignorance of the law may not be a widely accepted defence, individuals may have other defence options available depending on the specifics of their case and the applicable laws. Consulting with a lawyer is crucial to understanding one's defence options and navigating the complexities of the legal system.

Frequently asked questions