Hipaa Laws And Journalists: What's The Deal?

While HIPAA laws don't directly apply to journalists, there are two scenarios in which they may become applicable: if there was a wrongful act in obtaining an individual's healthcare information, or if state law barriers are in place. HIPAA protects private healthcare information from being released to the public without consent, and several courts have stated that publishing medical information without consent is offensive and not newsworthy. Therefore, journalists must obtain consent before publishing an individual's medical information to avoid being held liable for the publication of private facts.

Journalists can publish sensitive info if they have consent from the interviewee

Journalists have a duty to be rigorous and robust in their investigations, but they must also respect people's privacy. This includes anything that a person might reasonably expect to keep from becoming public knowledge, such as medical information.

In the United States, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) establishes federal standards that protect sensitive health information from disclosure without a patient's consent. HIPAA prevents the publication of medical information, and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) prevents the publication of student education records.

If a journalist obtains consent from an interviewee to publish their medical or private information, privacy laws like HIPAA and FERPA do not prevent the journalist from publishing that information. However, it is important to note that the publication of sensitive information can still cause harm to the interviewee and their family.

Before publishing sensitive information, journalists should consider the potential impact on the interviewee and seek consent from them. Getting consent is not only ethical but also protects the journalist from being sued by the interviewee. It is recommended to obtain written consent, especially if the interviewee is a minor, in which case consent from a parent or guardian is also advisable.

Additionally, journalists should be mindful of the forum in which the information will be published. For example, a school newspaper can be a non-public forum, giving the school authority to regulate content and block stories it deems inappropriate, even with the interviewee's consent.

While HIPAA does not directly apply to journalists, there are two scenarios in which it might:

• If there was a wrongful act in obtaining an individual's healthcare information, such as through false pretenses or fraud.
• State law barriers, where state laws may limit situations in which reporters can disclose medical information.

In conclusion, journalists can publish sensitive information if they have consent from the interviewee, but they should carefully consider the potential impact and ethical implications of doing so.

HIPAA may apply if journalists obtain healthcare info through false pretences

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) protects private health care information from being released to the public without the patient's consent. While HIPAA does not directly apply to news reporters, there are two scenarios in which HIPAA might apply to journalists:

• If there was a wrongful act in obtaining an individual’s healthcare information: A journalist likely violates HIPAA if they obtain and disclose health care information through false pretenses, misrepresentation, or fraud. For example, if a journalist represents themselves as the parent of a student to receive the student's medical files, that would be illegal and a violation of HIPAA.
• State law barriers: State law may also limit situations in which reporters can disclose medical information. For example, Michigan law requires that a patient must be aware of any disclosures of their health information and must also consent to all disclosures. Speaking to a journalist knowingly and voluntarily about a medical condition would constitute proper consent and disclosure in Michigan.

Student journalists can publish medical info if consent is given

Student journalists can publish medical information if consent is given by the individual in question. While laws like the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) prevent the publication of certain private facts, they are not applicable if consent is given. HIPAA protects an individual's private healthcare information from being released to the public without their consent, but individuals are free to disclose their medical information to others if they choose. Therefore, if a student journalist receives consent from a student to publish their medical information, they are not violating HIPAA.

It is important to note that the type of forum the school newspaper is considered will determine the level of control the school has over the content of the published stories. If the newspaper is a non-public forum, the school has significant authority and can limit the publication of stories it deems inappropriate, even with the subject's consent. However, if the newspaper is a limited public forum or a public forum, the school will have a more challenging time regulating sensitive stories, and student journalists will have more freedom to publish a wider variety of stories.

Before publishing sensitive information, student journalists should always prioritize obtaining consent from the individual being interviewed. This not only protects them from potential lawsuits but is also the most ethical course of action. It is crucial to respect an individual's privacy and only publish information with their explicit consent, especially when dealing with minors, as portraying a minor in an unfavorable light may result in legal consequences. Student journalists should also be mindful of journalism ethics and consider the potential impact of their stories on the reputation and well-being of the individuals involved.

While HIPAA does not directly apply to journalists, there are two scenarios in which it might:

• If there was a wrongful act in obtaining an individual's healthcare information, such as through false pretenses or misrepresentation.
• State law barriers, where certain states may have specific requirements for patient consent and disclosure of medical information.

In conclusion, student journalists can publish medical information if consent is given by the individual, but they should also be mindful of the ethical implications, the potential impact on minors, and the specific laws and regulations governing the disclosure of medical information in their state.

FERPA prevents the publication of student education records

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) are two distinct pieces of legislation that protect the privacy of individuals in the United States. While HIPAA pertains to the protection of sensitive health information, FERPA is specifically concerned with maintaining the confidentiality of student educational records.

FERPA, also known as the Buckley Amendment, was enacted in 1974 to safeguard the privacy of personally identifiable information in a student's education record. The Act grants parents and students aged 18 or older access to these records while also protecting them from unauthorised disclosure to third parties without parental consent. FERPA defines an education record as any information about a student that is maintained by schools or educational agencies in any recorded format, including handwriting, print, computer media, video or audio tapes, and film. Examples of information included in education records are:

• Date and place of birth, parent or guardian contact information, and emergency contacts.
• Grades, test scores, courses taken, academic activities, and official letters regarding a student's status.
• Special education and disciplinary records.
• Medical and health records maintained by the school.
• Documentation of attendance, schools attended, courses taken, awards, and degrees earned.
• Personal information such as a student's identification code, social security number, picture, or other identifiable data.

FERPA also allows schools to release "directory information," such as a student's name, address, telephone number, honours and awards, and other basic demographic details. However, even this type of information can be subject to FERPA protection if it can be linked to a specific student.

While FERPA generally prevents the disclosure of student education records, there are several exceptions. Records may be released without the student's consent to school officials with a legitimate educational interest, to other schools where the student seeks to enrol, to education officials for audits or evaluations, and in certain cases, to law enforcement or in response to subpoenas or court orders.

In summary, FERPA plays a crucial role in safeguarding the privacy of student education records. It empowers parents and eligible students to access, review, and correct these records while also establishing strict guidelines for their disclosure. By doing so, FERPA helps protect the confidentiality and integrity of student information in the educational context.

Schools can censor stories in school newspapers if they are non-public forums

In the United States, the First Amendment protects the freedom of speech and press freedom of all Americans, including students in school. However, the Supreme Court has affirmed that these rights are not unlimited. In the 1988 case Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, the Supreme Court ruled that school officials can censor school-sponsored publications if their decision is "reasonably related to a legitimate pedagogical purpose." This means that school officials must demonstrate a reasonable educational rationale for censoring the material. This could include content that is "ungrammatical, poorly written, inadequately researched, biased or prejudiced, vulgar or profane, or unsuitable for immature audiences." The court also stated that schools could censor content that would "associate the school with anything other than neutrality on matters of political controversy."

Following the Hazelwood decision, several states passed "anti-Hazelwood laws" that grant student journalists more protection. These include Arkansas, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, and Oregon. Additionally, the Journalism Education Association, the nation's largest association of scholastic journalism educators, has endorsed student freedom of expression. They argue that empowering students to make content decisions fosters a sense of responsibility and teaches them to make wise choices.

While the First Amendment only applies to government action, and therefore does not directly apply to private schools, some states have laws that provide press freedom protections to private school student journalists. For example, California has a law (Cal. Educ. Code Sec. 48907) that requires school officials to justify all acts of censorship under the standard set by the Tinker opinion, which states that student expression may be limited when it causes a "material and substantial disruption of school activities or an invasion of the rights of others."

In conclusion, while the First Amendment protects the freedom of speech and press for students in school, school officials do have the authority to censor school-sponsored publications if their decision is reasonably related to a legitimate educational purpose. However, this authority is not unlimited, and there are state laws and advocacy groups that work to protect student journalists' rights.

Frequently asked questions