Comparative Advantage: Who Benefits?

The law of comparative advantage is an economic principle that applies to individuals, firms, and nations. It explains how these entities can benefit from trade by producing goods or services at a lower opportunity cost than their trading partners. This means that they can produce something at a lower relative cost than others, even if they are not the best or most efficient at producing it. The law of comparative advantage suggests that countries will export goods that they have a relative advantage in producing, while importing goods that they cannot produce as efficiently. This law, dating back to the early 1800s, was popularized by British economist David Ricardo and is considered one of the most important concepts in economic theory.

Companies

The law of comparative advantage applies to companies in several ways. Firstly, it enables a company to increase its profitability and efficiency by leveraging resources and lower labour costs in foreign countries, thereby reducing expenses on goods and materials. This advantage is not dependent on being the best at creating a product or service but rather on having the lowest opportunity cost among competitors.

Comparative advantage allows companies to gain stronger sales margins and greater profitability by selling goods and services at reduced prices compared to their competitors. It provides access to new markets, stimulates economic growth, and encourages companies to price items lower, making products more accessible to consumers.

Additionally, companies with a comparative advantage can reallocate funds saved on production costs towards improving other areas of the business, such as increasing employee wages or enhancing the work environment. They can also diversify their products and services, reducing dependence on a single market or product and mitigating the risk of economic downturns.

By engaging in international trade, companies can access new technologies, ideas, and best practices from other countries, leading to improved quality of products and services, making them more competitive in the market.

Furthermore, the law of comparative advantage encourages specialisation among companies. Firms tend to focus their labour, capital, and resources on production processes with lower opportunity costs, achieving higher profit margins as a result.

Comparative advantage also differs from competitive advantage. While comparative advantage focuses on lower costs, competitive advantage involves offering consumers products or services of better value. Companies often strive for both types of advantages to strengthen their market position.

Countries

The law of comparative advantage applies to countries in the following ways:

Production and Trade

The law of comparative advantage suggests that countries will engage in trade with one another, exporting goods in which they have a relative advantage. This means that countries should focus on producing and exporting goods that they can make at a lower opportunity cost than their trading partners. This is true even if one country has an absolute advantage in all products. For example, if Country A can produce 1000 rice cakes or 3000 loaves of banana bread, and Country B can produce 1000 rice cakes or 2000 loaves of banana bread, both countries would benefit from Country B producing rice cakes for both nations and Country A producing banana bread. This would result in 500 more loaves of banana bread being produced overall.

Specialization

The law of comparative advantage encourages countries to specialize in producing goods in which they have a comparative advantage. This means that a country should focus its resources and labour on producing goods that it can make at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partners. By specializing in these goods, countries can increase their efficiency and productivity, as well as achieve economies of scale and innovation. For example, during the Industrial Revolution, Britain essentially outsourced its food growth by importing grains, meat, cheese, and wine, and focused on manufacturing goods for export, becoming the "workshop of the world".

Free Trade

The law of comparative advantage supports the idea of free trade by demonstrating that protectionism is unnecessary. Free-trade policies advocate for the absence of import restrictions, such as tariffs and quotas, and no subsidization of export industries. According to the law of comparative advantage, restrictions on trade make all consumers, even those in the protecting country, poorer. By engaging in true free trade and specializing in areas of highest expertise and success, countries can achieve maximum efficiency and output.

Increased Welfare

The law of comparative advantage suggests that total economic welfare in all countries is improved when countries focus on industries where they have the highest expertise and success, and the lowest opportunity costs. By trading with each other, countries can benefit from the gains of specialisation and exchange. Consumers in each country can access a greater variety of goods at lower prices, leading to improved standards of living.

Individuals

The law of comparative advantage applies to individuals in several ways. Firstly, it helps individuals understand their strengths and weaknesses in relation to others. For instance, a person may have a comparative advantage in producing a certain good if they can do so at a lower cost than others, even if they lack absolute skill in that area. This is because comparative advantage considers the opportunity cost, or the value of what is given up, rather than solely comparing absolute advantages.

For example, consider two individuals, A and B, who can choose to perform Task X or Task Y. If A is better at performing Task X than B, and B is better at performing Task Y than A, then it seems intuitive that each person should focus on the task they are relatively better at. However, this ignores the opportunity cost. If A is only slightly better at Task X than B, but is significantly better at Task Y, then A's opportunity cost of performing Task X is higher, and they actually have a comparative advantage in Task Y.

Comparative advantage also highlights the benefits of trade and specialization for individuals. By specialising in tasks or activities where they have a comparative advantage, individuals can increase their overall productivity and efficiency. This is because they can focus their time and resources on what they can do best, or at the lowest opportunity cost, and trade with others for the remaining goods or services they need.

For instance, consider an individual who is a skilled painter and cabinetmaker. If they spend their time painting, they can produce six paintings worth $2,400 in a week. If they instead spend their time making cabinets, they can produce three cabinets worth $1,050 in a week. By specialising in painting, the individual can increase their income and overall productivity. Additionally, if they trade their paintings for cabinets produced by someone else, they can still satisfy their need for cabinets while maximising their gains from their area of comparative advantage.

Comparative advantage also helps explain wage differences and job choices for individuals. People tend to learn their comparative advantages through wages. If a skilled mathematician can earn more money as an engineer than as a teacher, they have a comparative advantage in engineering. This drives them towards jobs that utilise their strengths and result in higher productivity and efficiency for both the individual and society as a whole.

Overall, the law of comparative advantage is a powerful concept that helps individuals understand their strengths, make informed decisions about specialisation and trade, and maximise their productivity and efficiency.

Free trade

The law of comparative advantage is an economic principle that demonstrates the benefits of free trade. It argues that countries, companies, or individuals can benefit from trade by specialising in producing certain goods or services that they have a comparative advantage in, and then trading these for other goods or services.

Comparative advantage refers to an economy's ability to produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost than its trading partners. This means that a country can produce a good or service more cheaply or easily than other countries. For example, one country may have a comparative advantage in producing agricultural products, while another may have a comparative advantage in manufacturing goods. By specialising in their respective areas of strength and engaging in free trade, both countries can benefit from access to a greater variety of goods and services at lower costs.

The law of comparative advantage is often associated with free trade and is seen as beneficial to all parties involved. Free trade allows countries to focus on industries where they have the highest expertise, success, and lowest opportunity costs. This leads to increased efficiency and innovation, resulting in higher production and lower prices. Consumers benefit from access to cheaper foreign goods, as well as cheaper domestic goods, leading to an improved standard of living.

For example, during the 19th-century Industrial Revolution, Britain essentially outsourced its food growth by importing grains, meat, cheese, and wine, while focusing on manufacturing goods for export. This allowed Britain to become the workshop of the world for decades.

However, critics argue that free trade can lead to the exploitation of weaker parties, particularly in developing countries. It can result in unfair or poor working conditions, resource depletion, and a disadvantage for developing countries that specialise in certain export crops but remain dependent on global food prices.

Absolute advantage

The law of comparative advantage applies to individuals, firms, or nations.

A concept developed by Adam Smith, absolute advantage can be the basis for large gains from trade between producers of different goods with different absolute advantages.

By specialization, division of labour, and trade, producers with different absolute advantages can always gain more than producing and consuming in isolation.

Adam Smith argued that specializing in the products that they each have an absolute advantage in and then trading the products can make all countries better off, as long as they each have at least one product for which they hold an absolute advantage over other nations.

Examples of Absolute Advantage

• Saudi Arabia's oil reserves are abundant, giving it an absolute advantage. That's one reason it exports the commodity to other nations worldwide.
• Japan and Italy both produce automobiles. If Italy can manufacture higher-quality sports cars with greater profit, then Italy is said to have an absolute advantage in that industry. On the other hand, Japan may devote limited resources and labour to electric cars or another industry to enjoy an absolute advantage rather than trying to compete with Italy's efficiency.

Frequently asked questions